Skip to comments.
UK Expects Israeli Attack On Iran Next Month With US Logistical Support
Debkafiles ^
Posted on 11/13/2011 10:45:11 AM PST by drewh
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
11/13/2011 10:45:14 AM PST
by
drewh
To: drewh
How cowardly it makes us seem when the "Great Satan" has to wait for the "Little Satan" to make a move against
the True Satan.
2
posted on
11/13/2011 10:47:36 AM PST
by
Olog-hai
To: drewh
To: PetroniusMaximus
“Debka!”
My thought too. There are a lot of possible scenarios, now we know which one will definitely NOT happen.
4
posted on
11/13/2011 10:52:22 AM PST
by
BobL
(Send Rove a Message, VOTE CAIN, no matter what)
To: Olog-hai
According to the British paper, which has good military and intelligence ties in London,
President Barack Obama would "have to support the Israelis or risk losing Jewish-American support in the next presidential election."Its getting crunch time for the elections next year!
5
posted on
11/13/2011 10:55:33 AM PST
by
drewh
To: BobL
0 support Israel? Highly doubt that will happen.
6
posted on
11/13/2011 10:56:02 AM PST
by
Mmogamer
(I refudiate the lamestream media, leftists and their prevaricutions.)
To: drewh
Debka, a required read for a reality check when you start to think that journalism is flawless.
7
posted on
11/13/2011 10:56:38 AM PST
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: drewh
Could we mail Iran the 'Battle Plan' while we're at it?
SHEESH!
8
posted on
11/13/2011 10:59:21 AM PST
by
airborne
(Paratroopers! Good to the last drop!)
To: PetroniusMaximus
It originated in the Daily Mail. Debka bash not appropiate in this case. Keep Nutjob guessing.
9
posted on
11/13/2011 11:04:16 AM PST
by
Genoa
(Starve the beast.)
To: drewh
Debka predicts an attack and Iranians with dual citizenship are fleeing Iran, pretty much assuring that Israel will not be involved in any attack, and the US Administration hasn't the stones or desire to attack Iran.
So some false flag misdirection? Or a big nothing?
We wait and see.
10
posted on
11/13/2011 11:05:05 AM PST
by
Navy Patriot
(Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it. (plagiarized))
To: Mmogamer
“0 support Israel? Highly doubt that will happen.”
It’s called bring the Jewish vote (and especially money) home...
11
posted on
11/13/2011 11:06:42 AM PST
by
BobL
(Send Rove a Message, VOTE CAIN, no matter what)
To: BobL
Took the words right out of my mouth.
To: drewh
They have been saying this for how long now, 5 years, 10 years. I will believe it when I see it.
13
posted on
11/13/2011 11:22:05 AM PST
by
org.whodat
(Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Perry and his fellow demorats.)
To: Olog-hai
How cowardly it makes us seem when the "Great Satan" has to wait for the "Little Satan" to make a move against the True Satan. Post of the week.
14
posted on
11/13/2011 11:44:29 AM PST
by
Scutter
To: drewh
Link to the
original article in the Daily Mail.
It appears Debka took the article, rewrote it and posted it.
Lots of info in the Daily Mail article that's not in the Debka article.
15
posted on
11/13/2011 11:44:29 AM PST
by
upchuck
(Rerun: Think you know hardship? Wait till the dollar is no longer the world's reserve currency.)
To: drewh
I wish I had a dollar for every time I’ve heard “Israel to attack Iran”. A Google search for “Israel to attack Iran” brings up 4,070,000 hits.
To: Olog-hai
I pray that these leaks from the UK are merely deliberate misinformation. Happy as I would be to see Iran’s nuclear ambitions smashed, I don’t think that Israel is the one to do it. We have no carrier groups, no pilots trained to land on carriers, and a very hard time getting flyover clearance for such a mission, being a regional paraiah for beating the Moose Limbs and living better than them. The US has carriers and superpower status. Britain has carriers and former great power status. If the US is unwilling, let Tommy Atkins carry the white man’s burden once again. We’re not entirely white (lots of Eastern, Menashe and Ethiopian Jooos!), and entirely too small to take on that burden vis a vis Iran. All those astounding victories, 1948, 1967 and 1973, were in defensive wars. This is something else entirely.
17
posted on
11/13/2011 12:04:48 PM PST
by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
To: drewh
But...it’s the London Daily Mail!
;-)
18
posted on
11/13/2011 12:40:48 PM PST
by
familyop
("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
To: familyop
The purpose of this public sabre - rattling is to convince Russia and China to go along with sanctions.
To: I Shall Endure
20
posted on
11/13/2011 2:34:45 PM PST
by
familyop
("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson