1 posted on
11/07/2011 10:55:08 AM PST by
reegs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
To: reegs
Sadly, I think this is the end of the Cain campaign. Stick a fork in Cain. he’s done.
Now we are left with two choices - RINO Mitt and RINO Perry. Pick one and be done with it.
(Newt with this third wife aint a realistic choice. The Family Values crowd of which I am a part of will stage a rebellion)
To: reegs
Something doesn't add up here.
I've read her statement.
She claims that she only wanted to contact Cain to get his help in getting her a job (at her boyfriend's suggestion).
So based on a prior meeting where she obviously had been friendly with him (both at a dinner and afterwards at an after dinner party), she calls him and expresses an interest to meet with him (with no mention to him that she is only interested in his help in getting a job).
She advises him that she is staying at the Capital Hilton Hotel. Now why would she have told him that?
Then she asks him where they should meet? Why not just ask to see him in his office?
Then she shows up at the hotel and finds out that he's upgraded her room to a palatial suite. But does this give her pause that he may be getting the wrong idea? No.
So now they meet in the bar and have drinks. Now I don't know about y'alls, but I'd assume that if you're having a number of "drinks", the reason for wanting to meet with him would come up. But no, - THAT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. And as Judy Judy always says "if it doesn't make sense, it isn't likely to be true".
They then head out to a Italian restaurant where finally during the dinner (and presumably many more drinks) she supposedly let's the cat out of the bag that her boyfriend suggested she ask Cain for help in getting a job. Raise your hand if you believe she brought up her "boyfriend" at any time during her meeting with Cain.
They ten get into a car (and you have to assume that they are both more than half plowed (based on the "drinks" before and during dinner), where who the hell knows what was signalled, said or done.
Because parts of this just don't make sense, I'm inclined not to believe any of it.
But if parts of it are true, then she clearly gave him a lot of mixed or misleading signals that she may be open for business - IMHO
688 posted on
11/07/2011 3:09:15 PM PST by
Riodacat
(And when all is said and done, there'll be a hell of a lot more said than done......)
To: reegs
Here’s what I believe: Any idiot who kneejerkedly takes a position directly contrary to what they think the media is saying is just as much a prisoner of the media’s mind-wash as the most goosestepping liberal.
If you always take a position contrary to what Mr. Media says — if Mr. Media says x, so you decide “anti-x” — then Mr. Media still controls your brain. Because by saying x they dictate you will, without a moment’s thought, brainlessly parrot back “anti-x!”
Whether Herman Cain is innocent or guilty of what he is alleged to have done is wholly independent of whether the media “wants” him to be guilty.
Yes, of course they want him to be guilty. It doesn’t mean we shut our brain’s off just because we don not like the media.
735 posted on
11/07/2011 3:47:30 PM PST by
DeusExMachina05
(I will not go into Dhimmitude quietly.)
To: reegs
I watched this “woman” read her allegations again with Gloria. She seemed as if she were reading “Brown Bear, Brown Bear.....What Do You See” to a room of kindergarten students.
She is TOTALY unbelievable.
750 posted on
11/07/2011 3:56:57 PM PST by
CWSNTEXAS
(Am I'm the ONLY Conservative Jew in America? What's wrong with you other schmucks?)
To: reegs
764 posted on
11/07/2011 4:07:14 PM PST by
xuberalles
("The Right Stuff" Conservative Novelties http://www.zazzle.com/xuberalles)
To: reegs
I found another picture of Herman's latest "accuser". She also goes by the name.... "Stiffler's Mom" !!!
![](http://mangusmovie.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/1723140.jpg)
774 posted on
11/07/2011 4:17:05 PM PST by
CWSNTEXAS
(Am I'm the ONLY Conservative Jew in America? What's wrong with you other schmucks?)
To: reegs
It’s a good bet that these women are being paid to march out and accuse Herman Cain. It’s also a good bet that they are all liberal democrats. Follow the money.
805 posted on
11/07/2011 4:47:15 PM PST by
lwoodham
(Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.)
To: reegs
826 posted on
11/07/2011 5:25:36 PM PST by
NoLibZone
(Occupy is the DNC's use of children,indigent & infirm to push back TeaParty calls for smaller gov't)
To: reegs
827 posted on
11/07/2011 5:33:29 PM PST by
doug from upland
(Just in case, it has been reserved: www.TheBitchIsBack2012.com)
To: reegs
This is about a smear campaign for Allred and a payday for the "victim".
Line of the night:
"I look forward to her spread in Playboy."
-- Dick Morris
849 posted on
11/07/2011 6:14:55 PM PST by
Windcatcher
(Obama is a COMMUNIST and the MSM is his armband-wearing propaganda machine.)
To: reegs
I first saw this thread at 1PM. Is the conference still going as the title suggests?
To: reegs
I see a future headline on this:
“89th Accuser Comes Forward As President Cain Is Sworn In For 2nd Term”
And still no concrete evidence or accusations that anything actually happened.
To: reegs
To: reegs
My suggestion would be to get spokespeople and/or members of the Republican party to get the following message out to the media. “We take sexual harassment very seriously, however where was the media on Obama’s admission of cocaine use or the multiple sexual ASSAULTS made by a multitude of women against Bill Clinton, including rape by Juanita Broderick. Hammer this message home at every press conference. I guarantee you this witch hunt would come to an end.
929 posted on
11/08/2011 6:51:48 PM PST by
doc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson