Posted on 07/17/2011 3:39:40 PM PDT by kristinn
Did I ever say that?
When did I say that?
Never.
Where are you "coming from" on this? It seems to me from your posts that there is very little daylight between you, Obama, Reid, and Pelosi in terms of Food Stamps and Entitlements that have bankrupted our nation.
I suspect you are most POd about EITC ~ which is a $50 billion program. With a nearly $2 trillion excess spending gap to be filled, that is 0.25%, 1/4 of 1% of the gap.
Here, let's take it slow ~ when your tax needs are so great that if you TAXED everything away from every wage earner, whether poor, medium or huge, or super rich ~ 100% taxation ~ and you still don't have enough money to pay the obligations, it's not people earning a living, or even the poor, who are causing your problems.
It's a SPENDING PROBLEM, and not even a SPENDING ON ENTITLEMENTS PROBLEM, but just Wildassed stupid nonstop monstrous spending.
You cannot win the game by just clamping down on SSS, SS, EITC and food stamps.
IGNORE WHAT HE SAYS.
It is a true statement. I believe the current figure is 47% of people pay no Federal Taxes.
Moreover, I doubt it was Obama who said "skin in the game", especially in the context of the boobs who are getting the Earned Income Tax Credit (i.e. a check for nearly $4K for a "tax refund" when you never even paid taxes!)
Here is the deal with the "skin in the game" analogy. Even if you are of modest means, you still would be required to pay Federal Taxes. A very, very small portion of your income, but nevertheless you would pay something.
Then, when "this" program or "that" program is proposed by the Democrats.......suddenly these people who are paying taxes will realize that maybe that new program isn't such a good idea after all.
And THAT is how that works.
Besides being totally unable to avoid some kind of taxes in this country, personal sacrifice is “skin in the game” even if Obama and you don’t think so. His first major reference to “skin” occurs in this little tale at: http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/01/obama_everbodys_skin_in_the_ga.html
Like this:
Now, add up 20%, 22%, and 16%.
You should come up with 58%, which is where we start with before we can even cut anything else.
That 58% is bankrupting the country. It all started with FDR, but it still continue.
Considering what that particular program does, weigh it against Department of Education which hands out $78 billion per year in grants to school districts, et al, which has plenty of well-paid employees who really don't need those grants!
I think you should start with Commerce Department, Department of Labor, Department of Education, Housing and Urban Development, and so forth.
Although the food stamp program started up in the 1960s, way back during the Great Depression a deal was struck with the states whereby the federal government would collect the taxes for and pay welfare!
Food stamps are also extended to working poor ~ not just to the handicapped, disabled, low income elderly, and chilluns!
BTW, the only way you get EITC is to earn a living that is subject to FICA. EITC is designed, in part, to mitigate FICA and other direct taxes on the working poor.
BTW, be a good idea to clawback all our money Obama gave to the banks and brokerages to bail them out.
And I mean ALL of it.
There's plenty for the House of Representatives to direct the President to cut without even thinking about SS, SSS, SNAP and EITCH.
BTW, SS is PAID FOR WITH FICA.
Did you see that video about the ETIC scam? Did you watch it? Do you understand what Clinton and the Democrats did?
Moreover, a "sense of scale" with entitlements is a laughable concept.
There are over 60 "welfare" programs including the Food Stamp program. Democrats have divided them into little pieces.
Take a re-look at this chart, and look that the "Unemployment Insurance and Other Entitlements" block. Eighty Billion here, eighty billion there, and soon you are talking serious money.
The problem with entitlements is several fold:
- they cause people to become dependent, slothful, and ungrateful
- they never end
- they always grow
- they create a political class the Democrats exploit
- they destroy self esteem and God given dignity
Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?
There has been exactly ONE welfare reform bill passed by Congress and signed by a President. Clinton reluctantly signed a welfare reform bill that slightly modified ONE program (AFDP). Guess what? Obama overturned that small reform in his first week. The word was his mother-in-law screamed about it.
The other 60+ programs were never touched, and won't be touched.
finally, let's talk about the whole premise of the program: feeding the hungry. People in the country are not starving - especially the poor! We are the only nation in the history of humanity to have a majority obese poor population. And it isn't "nutrition education" for the answer either. That is HUD spin. These people do not have any self control or discipline. We are literally feeding that.
I agree with you: get rid of HUD, Dept of Education, Dept of Energy, the TSA, and all these other hated Federal agencies.
We also need to seriously reform Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. Not "ten years from now." No kick the can down the road. Now.
Unemployment Compensation is limited in duration and is paid by states out of a fund created by taxes collected on employers.
Federal highway building programs are paid for out of gasoline taxes ~ and to tell you I find it outrageous that we encourage Socialist meddling with this gas tax operation. Those roads should be built by private companies. You want something wasteful and prone to making people slothful that's gotta' be a 6 lane super highway ~
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.