Posted on 06/30/2011 4:18:01 PM PDT by unspun
Hospitals in areas with many illegals soon go out of business, but Parkland somehow manages to not only stay open but thrives and is expanding. Can we say big help from Uncle Sam? The Dems and the RINOs both are conspiring to replace the pesky, independent Anglo population with a new maleable population from south of the border. I have figured something out, the RINOs don’t even care if their party becomes a minority party as long as they personally are the elitist wealthy insiders. The big business interests can always play let’s make a deal with corrupt Democrats, so why do they care about the Republican voters?
As far as the Mexican cheap labor and cheap votes — there will be an endless supply of them since the Mexican population has doubled between 1970 and 2000.
Soros is not the first to believe in a world government. It has been going on for a long time.
It's become increasingly clear, it's all about total control of food, people, resources, wealth, energy, travel, money etc.
Most Americans are the product of revolutionary's who question government and authority. This is counter productive to government which has morphed into a ruling class Oligarchy .
Wow. That’s terrible. The best we have is a D+, based on their criteria. I am going to check this out to see how they graded the candidates.
I finally found the Numbers USA page. Here are the vdare and Numbers USA pages.
http://www.vdare.com/washington_watcher/110630_bachmann.htm
Oops, i didn’t catch the Numbers USA page. Here I go again:
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/action/2012-presidential-hopefuls-immigration-stances.html
I disagree strongly on the Numbers USA one-issue of immigration.
The worst is their stand on birthright citizenship. If moma’s strong and determined enough to deliver on US soil, then that says a lot about her backbone and ability. It’s almost as if, looking at nations built of immigrants, there’s a “survival of the fittest principle. The ones that stay home are weaker and less successful. (how do we Americans give our own children a similar challenge, since we have no new frontiers to conquer?)
However, if moma’s not a legal immigrant, she must be deported and her minor children belong with her. They absolutely must make a decision between the countries between 18 and 25, in my opinion. ( even all those with dual US/Israeli citizenship!)
The hard question comes from children - especially the Mexicans- who have been raised in the US, gone through and graduated from our public schools because of our past failures to enforce immigration laws. Do we want to deport them, creating an angry, alienated population in Mexico?
Or could we expect them to declare and follow through on a determination to become US citizens, make good grades in college, get and keep a job, and/or enter the military? I keep hoping that parents would push their child toward this option the same way some push sports for college.
We were duped before 25 years ago during the Reagan amnesty. We cannot afford to be duped again. Did you know that the Mexican population doubled between the years of 1970 and 2000? They used to be 50 million and now they are above 100 million. They have a highly disfunctional culture and we are paying for it. We are paying for their ILLEGAL social programs and their crimes and the school kids who are not supposed to be here.
Personally, I would rather spend my compassion on my granddaughters who are 8 and 2 years old. I feel sorry for them because the country they will inherit will be nothing like the country that we were fortunate to have grown up in.
The children of illegal aliens who came here at a young age should contact an immigration lawyer. That is what they are there for. We cannot be involving ourselves in the intricacies of all of the lives of the MILLIONS of illegals who have invaded our country in the past twenty years. It is their problem let them figure it out. Have you heard of compassion fatigue? You know what, after they destroy our childrens’ future they will have absolutely no compassion for them.
With all due respect let's not chase rabbits but stick to the subject which was "stealth way". If you'll read back, you'll see that you never really answered "how" it was done in a "stealth way"(which was my question) but that it just "was".
That's the problem I have with people who post and defend what (to me) are "conspiracies". They never explain the "how", just that "it is".
Why would for example some state like Kansas spend the money to build a "super corridor"? How would that benefit them? Do they have a horrific traffic problem? Why would any state spend billions of state treasure for the benefit of some Chinese goods and Mexican truckers. And wouldn't all those states have to coordinate those plans? How could that possibly be done in a "stealth way"? Sorry but it's just not logical to me and therefore I reject it.
bump!
The Obama administration threatened TX regarding the airports and TSA. TX would rather keep the TSA and the airports operational.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.