Posted on 05/23/2011 8:26:35 AM PDT by smoothsailing
So even though she lost the election by 7000 votes she was apparently twice as likely statistically to pick up a vote as Prosser.
Funny how that always seems to be the case with Dem Candidates in recounts.
Communists and leftist liberals don’t regard any vote count that goes against them as legitimate. Therefore they will try to “make hay” and raise money while pretending to fight the final decisions.
This money will go to their next propaganda campaign to destroy the American electoral system.
Know how the enemy thinks, and you’ll understand what they do.
during the recount it was decided to count them as was and allow them if they can git them threw out it gives her a win
The problem that they are going to have making that argument is that the count didn't vary enough from the original count to the canvass to the recount to justify a claim of fraud or ballot tampering. No ward or precint had large changes in the vote totals.
They will waste piles of money, and after all is said and one, I think they will be right back here, with Prosser being re-seated.
How many times do you have to win before you’re declared the winner?
Actually it is the state of Wisconsin that is the loser in this seditious election fraud. No wonder that half the people don’t bother voting, why waste your time if your vote isn’t counted!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.