Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia criticizes NATO attack in Libya
AP ^ | May 01, 2011

Posted on 05/01/2011 1:34:42 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Did Russia care about the "proportionate use of force" when they were dropping cluster bombs on innocent Georgian civilians in 2008 to punish them for being America's friend?

Russia insisted that the recognition of Kosovo independence was a "precedent" to be repeated in Georgia. Did they think invading Georgia would have no consequences?

Russia massacred the Christians of Georgia but they get upset when bombs fall on the heads of their muslim terrorist allies like Kadaffi.

1 posted on 05/01/2011 1:34:44 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Dang whats a Code Pinker to do!


2 posted on 05/01/2011 1:41:57 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Race? Obama is only 1/16th Black. He is 1/2 Caucasion, 7/16 Arab. He has an Arab name not African.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
This whole business is about George Soros wanting to control that $5T in wealth which Libya represents.

Basically, Soros and Obunga are trying to perpetrate a bank robbery in broad daylight and using American military assets to do it.

3 posted on 05/01/2011 1:43:50 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

I want to start by saying I neither like or trust Russia on anything much. Russia’s actions in no way justify Nato bombing children, no matter what any of you will say. The same intelligence that gave Quadafi’s location would have known children were there. Of course the death’s would need verified as I don’t trust Lybian sources for anything but if its true and we knew it this is a war crime in my book and makes us no better than the enemy. BTW I am against taking down any government just to hand it over to any Islamic fundamentalists.


4 posted on 05/01/2011 1:48:05 PM PDT by enduserindy (Conservative Dead Head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

We are about to take a beating but I agree with you.


5 posted on 05/01/2011 1:51:10 PM PDT by enduserindy (Conservative Dead Head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: enduserindy

I thought Kadaffi’s adoring fans didn’t want NATO to “stop the killing,” because Kadaffi was killing muslims. Now you are upset because the killing of muslims has only increased? MAKE UP YOUR MINDS!


6 posted on 05/01/2011 1:51:28 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

So I take it you’re in favor of removing a secular dictator and installing an Islamic government?


7 posted on 05/01/2011 1:55:27 PM PDT by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Did Russia care about the "proportionate use of force" when they were dropping cluster bombs on innocent Georgian civilians in 2008 to punish them for being America's friend?

Have you ever heard of a One-Way Street, Joe?

8 posted on 05/01/2011 1:55:35 PM PDT by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Your hate for Russia runs wide and deep!!, But that has nothing to do with current events. What Russia did Russia did, NATO killing children has to do with Americans. Those are American missiles and bombs killing kids. But then maybe you think all Muslims should be killed, is that your position.


9 posted on 05/01/2011 2:02:12 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

That the Russians are hypocrites does not necessarily make them wrong every time they mouth off. IMO the United States would have been better off politically and morally had Comrade Zero not been allowed to lease the United States military to the Muslim Brotherhood for Libyan - or any other - use.


10 posted on 05/01/2011 2:04:01 PM PDT by niteowl77 (I don't mind them stewing in their own juices, but I do mind them stewing me in their own juices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

I HAVE NEVER IN ANY WAY SUGGESTED I WAS A DAFFY FAN A-H-!
I MADE UP MY MIND LONG AGO KILLING KIDS IS WRONG NO MATTER THEIR RELIGION!


11 posted on 05/01/2011 2:09:52 PM PDT by enduserindy (Conservative Dead Head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
Yeah, something really screwing going on here. I read that ‘someone’ has already confiscated/captured/gained control, however you want to say it, of the Libyan oil ports. And when they did it, they immediately(i mean same day) had the banks, wire transfers set up, customers, ships, accountants, controllers, managers, etc.

A so called ‘rebel’, riding around on a donkey with an AK, didn't do that.

12 posted on 05/01/2011 2:13:02 PM PDT by 240B (he is doing everything he said he wouldn't and not doing what he said he would)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Russia is, of course, right. I just wish they had vetoed the damn thing first, rather than abstaining.

But it probably wouldn’t have mattered in the end, it would have become a NATO mission, just like Bosnia and Kosava.


13 posted on 05/01/2011 2:40:16 PM PDT by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randomhero97
The notion that the psychotic islamofascist dictator Muamar Kadaffi is some kind of moderate secular leader who is an ally of the USA is one of the most absurd and ridiculous jokes I have heard in a long time. Anybody who believes that is a complete and total moron! Wake up!

I am in favor of doing what Imam Obama refuses to do because he doesn't want to upset Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan. Democrats love to start wars but they just HATE to WIN them.

14 posted on 05/01/2011 2:44:35 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Your love for Kadaffi runs deep! Maybe you think muslims shouldn’t be killed, is that your position? Only if they do not obey King Kadaffi?


15 posted on 05/01/2011 2:57:47 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

nice sheetrock
looked like reinforced concrete


16 posted on 05/01/2011 3:30:27 PM PDT by ralphetta7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: enduserindy; wendy1946
We are about to take a beating but I agree with you.

Not from me you won't.

Zero and Soros are indeed, after Mo's wealth and physical gold, as he is in position to be the IMF replacement for Northern Africa.

Additionally, Europe is after Mo's oil, and the Euro and US Dollar are not going to buy much in the way of commodities especially oil.

Europe now gets about 75% of Libyan oil, and China gets 11%, however, China recently outbid everybody on Libyan oil futures, and in five years China is contracted to receive above 85% of Libya's oil. Plus they pay cash with a stable currency that converts to gold.

With the North Sea oil rapidly going dry, Europe is totally screwed and will have to beg Russia for oil.

That's why Obama and NATO would kill anyone's children, let alone Quadaffy's.

17 posted on 05/01/2011 4:59:57 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BobL
I just wish they had vetoed the damn thing first, rather than abstaining.

When your enemy is going to hang himself, it is wise to give him as much rope as possible.

18 posted on 05/01/2011 5:04:04 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

The killer is that we should be exporting oil and not importing it.


19 posted on 05/01/2011 5:29:13 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
we should be exporting oil and not importing it.

Well, we should definitely be developing every possible source of US domestic fossil fuels, and seeking to improve the safety, efficiency and minimize environmental impact, keeping national security and energy independence as the irreplaceable FIRST priority.

Then we should use that energy to build an industrial economy that would create EFFICIENT, economical renewable energy technology. No boondoggle loser subsidized crap, no crony capitalistic crap, no Marxist crap.

If we got oil left over, export it.

20 posted on 05/01/2011 5:48:36 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson