Skip to comments.
Study predicts sea level rise for cities
UPI ^
| Feb. 15, 2011
| UPI
Posted on 02/15/2011 7:09:19 PM PST by mdittmar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: blackdog
If the research had been done in New Mexico it would have been more plausible.
21
posted on
02/15/2011 7:26:54 PM PST
by
353FMG
To: mdittmar
I don’t live too close to any cities, so I guess I’m OK.
22
posted on
02/15/2011 7:27:09 PM PST
by
skeeter
To: mdittmar
Washington DC flooded, the numbskulls and their minions having to relocate to fly-over country...
Revenge is best served cold.
23
posted on
02/15/2011 7:29:23 PM PST
by
DTogo
(High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
To: CedarDave
I think if you announced that university research grant monies were available which amounted to billions over decades, proving that Lucy is going to let Charlie Brown kick the football, we’d all be getting scientific studies announcing that in 2067, Charlie will in fact kick the football, hitting at the same time small children and elderly.
24
posted on
02/15/2011 7:29:32 PM PST
by
blackdog
To: mdittmar
You guys really don’t get it. For the next 80 years we are going to have excessive snowfall. When it melts it has no where to go but out to sea. See the sea levels will rise.
Q.E.D.
25
posted on
02/15/2011 7:30:23 PM PST
by
TAP ONLINE
( Democrats are Scorpions, you get the ride you deserve)
To: mdittmar
Research led by University of Arizona scientists suggests rising levels could threaten an average of 9 percent of the land within 180 U.S. coastal cities by the end of the century. There they go again.
Don't these incompetents ever give up?
Seems like those researchers need new leadership.
When The University of Arizona wannabes can show me bonae fides like this famous researcher/sea level expert, I might listen to them. I don't expect to have to waste my time.
A REAL Sea-Level Expert
With an honored proven record.
26
posted on
02/15/2011 7:31:23 PM PST
by
Publius6961
("In 1964 the War on Poverty Began --- Poverty won.")
To: doc1019
27
posted on
02/15/2011 7:31:58 PM PST
by
BunnySlippers
(I love BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: blackdog
I’m still waiting on funding for my great lakes whale research.
28
posted on
02/15/2011 7:32:07 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: doc1019
>sea level rise
>for cities
To: TAP ONLINE
Did you miss 6th grade Earth- Science class? Its precipitated back into the atmosphere.
To: mdittmar
Do we have to go through the ice-age rebound explanation
AGAIN? The sea is receding in northern latitudes. Many ancient ports in Scandinavia and other northern climes are finding themselves a good distance away from the waters' edge(e.g., Kokkola, Finland). That means, physics non-majors, that the sea MUST RISE in the lower latitudes. This has nothing to do with global warming, unless the complaint is that the ice age ended and now we have to deal with the horrible consequences.
31
posted on
02/15/2011 7:36:54 PM PST
by
cookcounty
(We can't be overdrawn, we still have moreT-Bill paper!)
To: mdittmar; steelyourfaith; Ernest_at_the_Beach
We’re doomed, I tell ya, doomed!
32
posted on
02/15/2011 7:37:14 PM PST
by
dynachrome
("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
To: mdittmar
Pin-The-Tail-On-The-Donkey
Scientific projections of global warming indicate that by 2100, the sea level will rise one meter -- about 3 feet.
This is settled science - there is NOTHING scientific about any Global Warming prognostications.
One meter? A yard (more or less)? I'm at 309 feet above sea level. Bring it on! LOL
33
posted on
02/15/2011 7:38:43 PM PST
by
upchuck
(When excerpting please use the entire 300 words we are allowed. No more one or two sentence posts!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum; blackdog
Not again is right, particularly since Arizona is totally landlocked. Way too much sun and cactus juice.
34
posted on
02/15/2011 7:40:36 PM PST
by
Grams A
(The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
To: dynachrome
35
posted on
02/15/2011 7:41:29 PM PST
by
glyptol
To: dynachrome
36
posted on
02/15/2011 7:41:35 PM PST
by
glyptol
To: mdittmar
Well..they better quit putting so many people in them. They’re sinking the land.
37
posted on
02/15/2011 7:48:20 PM PST
by
crz
To: kearnyirish2
I like when they use Venice as an illustration of the sea level already rising, as though the ocean can rise there without rising here. Pretty stupid stuff, batted about by losers who havent had a cause since the war in Vietnam ended...The sea is not rising as you said. Venice is sinking because of water being pumped out of the ground for use in agriculture and drinking on the mainland. This is a very common when large amounts of water are pumped out of the ground.
38
posted on
02/15/2011 7:51:22 PM PST
by
cpdiii
(Deckhand, Roughneck, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist, Iconoclast: THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
39
posted on
02/15/2011 7:55:34 PM PST
by
al baby
(Hi Mom!!! <sarc>)
To: cookcounty
40
posted on
02/15/2011 7:59:37 PM PST
by
WellyP
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson