Skip to comments.
Palin: No 'problem' with gay group at CPAC
The Hill ^
| 10 Feb 2011
| Michael O'Brien
Posted on 02/10/2011 6:25:57 AM PST by Notary Sojac
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 501-511 next last
To: onyx
Homosexuals are virulently opposed to her. Yes and no. The gay mafia that infests the press certainly is, but the Hillbuzz folks like her a lot, and they're as queer as a stack of $3 bills.
341
posted on
02/10/2011 12:32:52 PM PST
by
kevkrom
(De-fund Obamacare in 2011, repeal in 2013!)
To: little jeremiah; onyx
Sarah doesn’t back the homosexual agenda. I looked up some stuff last night and she is against homosexual “marriage”.
342
posted on
02/10/2011 12:32:58 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: indylindy
Sodomy (pronounced /ˈsɒdəmi/) is a term used in the law to describe the act of "unnatural"[1] sex, which depending on jurisdiction can consist of oral sex, anal sex, or any non-genital to genital congress, whether heterosexual, homosexual, or with human or animal.[2]
343
posted on
02/10/2011 12:34:37 PM PST
by
j.argese
(You may think you've won the day, in the end you will surely lose the important race.)
To: j.argese; indylindy
So you are admittedly trying to derail the discussion by a backdoor method.
344
posted on
02/10/2011 12:36:38 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: kevkrom
hillbuzz and tammy bruce. Both will do her more harm than they can ever deliver. Both are former democrats, and huge Hillary supporters. No thanks.
345
posted on
02/10/2011 12:37:00 PM PST
by
onyx
(If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
To: little jeremiah
346
posted on
02/10/2011 12:37:40 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: DJ MacWoW
I post under my actual name, so I would stop your libel right in it's little bitty tracks. I know the difference between and entrance and an exit.
You seem to know quite a bit about rimming and felching, do you practice what you preach ... against?
347
posted on
02/10/2011 12:38:01 PM PST
by
j.argese
(You may think you've won the day, in the end you will surely lose the important race.)
To: DJ MacWoW
I am not quite sure what that was! LOL
348
posted on
02/10/2011 12:38:24 PM PST
by
dforest
To: DJ MacWoW
Are you watching the Egypt mess on TV? I have been on that live thread all day.
349
posted on
02/10/2011 12:39:20 PM PST
by
onyx
(If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
To: Responsibility2nd
No Homosexuals are to be hired as teachersIs there a candidate for the Republican nomination who has clearly expressed this view??
350
posted on
02/10/2011 12:44:27 PM PST
by
Notary Sojac
(We have had three central banks in America's history: two of them failed and so will this one....)
To: xjcsa
...the Muslim Brotherhood's infiltration of CPAC...
Wow, aren't you in '24land'. I imagine soon the MB would be taking over the WH with Blackwater's help..... Unless of course you forgot the \sarc tag....
351
posted on
02/10/2011 12:45:03 PM PST
by
kroll
To: j.argese; DJ MacWoW
I don’t think you know the difference between your ass and a hole in the ground.....and I don’t think it’s just me who thinks that.
352
posted on
02/10/2011 12:49:26 PM PST
by
dforest
To: unseen1
To be a leader of a diverse group of citizens you can not play just to your base.
Agree with that...She made the right move. The way to beat Zero is to focus on the economy and the his Keynesian policies...not get sidetracked. Besides, its important that our leaders not promote hatred, even against the sinners...
353
posted on
02/10/2011 12:49:48 PM PST
by
kroll
To: little jeremiah
Freedom of speech has nothing to do with organizations allowing or disallowing groups to have their say.So if you don't agree with what CPAC has done, withdraw any support you might be giving them. That's your right.
354
posted on
02/10/2011 12:50:20 PM PST
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: DJ MacWoW
CPAC is no longer conservative.I'll take your word for it. I haven't been involved in the organization, so I wouldn't know.
If you want to be a cheering section for Dem liberals pretending to be conservatives in order to infiltrate and destroy thats your choice. But Id be careful being vocal about it.
Are you threatening me?
355
posted on
02/10/2011 12:51:38 PM PST
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: MEGoody
Are you threatening me? Grow up!
356
posted on
02/10/2011 12:55:50 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: j.argese
so I would stop your libel right in it's little bitty tracks. Liberals think the truth is libel. You're attempting to derail the discussion.
You seem to know quite a bit about rimming and felching, do you practice what you preach ... against?
You cry about libel then try your hand at it. You're a joke.
357
posted on
02/10/2011 12:58:21 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: HappyWarrior2012; little jeremiah; trisham; DJ MacWoW; Coleus; narses; Lesforlife; BykrBayb; ...
I didnt realize Sarah was a registered libertarian. Who knew? Sarah hasnt called herself a libertarian and neither did Reagan. Both, like many, say they have a few libertarian views but do not embrace all.
No troll, the problem is the libertarians who like to manipulate and misquote Sarah Palin to make it sound like she's one of them.
Stop inventing reasons to dislike her and just own it. You dont like her, fine. No need to invent reasons for it.
Hey troll, I was publicly pushing for Sarah Palin to be McCain's running mate several months before the average non-Alaskan even knew who she was. People thought I was crazy for saying that she could and should be the nominee. And if you don't believe me that's fine, I have the posts to prove it.
I've got to wonder troll, what other names have you used before on FR?
358
posted on
02/10/2011 12:58:21 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: johncocktoasten; Notary Sojac; wagglebee
Now no state can have it banned. >>>
That’s not entirely true. States can pass anti-abortion laws if they have the guts and moral fortitude. Just recently, South Dakota tried twice to make abortion legal and guess what organization was against it? The national right to life because “they” “felt” it wasn’t the appropriate time...They behaved like the democrats with their air of superiority and for interfering with rights of the people of a sovereign state.
And, the libertarian argument is wrong, the right to life is a God-given right, our founding fathers knew this and made it clear in the declaration of independence and made it law in the 5th and 14th amendments to the constitution.
Since the founding fathers made it clear that all Americans have a right to life, we need to make abortion illegal in all states at once by a federal human life amendment. or by having congress enforce article III section 2 of the US Constitution.
359
posted on
02/10/2011 12:58:43 PM PST
by
Coleus
(Adult Stem Cells Work, there is NO Need to Harvest Babies for Their Body Parts!)
To: onyx
360
posted on
02/10/2011 12:59:52 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 501-511 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson