The Media people are afraid to lose their over paid cushy
jobs. There are probably plenty of gay bosses in the media.
The GOP has thrown the Democrack Party a bone for the Holidays. It is Obama’s way of saying “Happy Holidays”. “I have decided to make the gay lifestyle normal.”
I really think that passing this is going to be one of those things that the left is going to regret. It’s going to be a matter of being careful what you ask for, maybe not for gay men, but definitely for the lesbians.
We have been hearing reports of lesbian bullying, threats of rape, women waking up with their lesbian tormentor standing over them, touching them, etc. and the refusal of COs to do anything about it because the problems with DADT. Now that DADT is no more, the women and their complaints will not be silenced.
Problems will be documented with pictures and tapes and if the COs continue to ignore the problems, there is always Wiki-leaks.
Destroying thousands of years of civilization and history for a group of individuals that up until ~30 years ago were considered to be either/or/or both criminal/mentally unstable is mind-boggling.
Why? Do they wield that much money and influence? The numbers suggest no. So, what's the answer?
Is being against homosexuality the same scourge being a racist? Not in my opinion. For 50+ years we have been conditioned to think that being racist is the worst thing to be. Think about it, you're looked on more favorably if you're a junkie, drunk or murderer than a racist. So, for the last ~25 years “they” have been trying the same thing with homosexuality, even though equating skin color with bedroom preferences is at best a false argument.
For example, look at many TV shows and movies, most of them have the token minority, the stupid, loud, heterosexual, fat white people (especially the men), the woman who's the boss and the gay. The real hoot is that the token gay character is usually looked at as the moral compass. Really? I stumbled across a few minutes of a show called “Degrassi High” and they have a tranny-bi-I-don't-know-what-the-hell-it's-supposed-to-be character (played by a female) that's pretending to be a HS boy lusting after a girl. Are you sh*tting me or what? And this is a show aimed at youngsters.
So, regardless of our religious beliefs, our personal beliefs and our values, we have to “accept” this lifestyle? Genetic or not, it is not a normal way to live. The time to say “this stops now” has long past with this social engineering bullsh*t.
Also, why does the gay community demand recognition and deference but they won’t return the favor by respecting the military’s distinctive warrior culture, which will be altered to some extent by this new law?
Fixed it.
I wonder if anybody is going to mention WHY DADT was started. Has this congressional bill changed the UCMJ. Cause sodomy is still punishable by Court Martial.
So many people do not see that the REAL homosexual agenda is to have sex with children.
The homosexuals are ultimately targeting children.
As Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson says:
“I know many former gays. I don’t know any former Blacks. It is not a civil rights issue.”
...In what is presented as a "civil rights" breakthrough, service men and women with same sex attraction will soon be able to openly declare that acting on those sexual desires identifies who they are as persons.
I'm sure many FReepers were waiting for homosexuality to be yoked to civil rights. Personally, I see a glaring difference between blacks who wanted to serve in the military and homosexuals.
Blacks who wanted to serve simply wanted to be seen as soldiers, soldiers who wanted to prove that they were as capable as thier white counterparts.
Homosexuals want to emphasize and proclaim their lifestyle; it isn't so much about civil rights as it is about forcing the military to accept a life style that is bound to destroy morale, cohesiveness, and readiness.
There is a huge difference between the two.
If I were a black man in America, I would resent gays piggybacking on real civil rights issues.
wow 2019, i guess we don’t have to worry about 2012 anymore
Law of Unintended Consequences:
Do male members get to just say no to gay urinalysis observers?
Imagine the Navy Ball (or others) when same sex start dancing/making out during a slow dance.
Would you take a blood transfusion from a gay service member?
Imagine when one gets captured by our muzzie friends!
etc, etc, etc