Posted on 11/27/2010 12:56:43 PM PST by factmart
That was before she forcefully endorsed his son for the Senate, but with Paul, you’re probably right. It wouldn’t matter.
Well, either way, it’s an endorsement she could do without. Ron Paul is a conspiracy theory crackpot.
I think I would describe myself in the same vein.
Well thanks, this thread is a great party!
Too bad, even after you politely asked them not to, it was crashed by a few rude b!+ches.
I think ya know who y'all are.
Right now, we can see the rabid PDS sufferers are supporters of:
Alan Keyes
Tom Tancredo
Mitt Romney
Ron Paul
Well besides algernonpj’s horrible grammar (so I can’t really take him seriously as any kind of “operative” much less his opinion), Keyes and Tancredo are caricatures of conservatives. Neither could carry one state... Duncan Hunter would have a better chance and he has the personality and appeal of someone running for city council.
Pence supported Amnesty... or does that not figure into your “research” and “principles”.
There’s nothing wrong with my objectivity. As always, my opposition to Palin is quite objective, and based on solid conservative grounds.
1. I don’t support politicians who are pro-choice for states on abortion, any more than an abolitionist would have supported Stephen A. Douglas in the 1850s.
2. I don’t support politicians who are judicial supremacists, and especially candidates for executive office who refuse to recognize their sworn duties when it comes to reining in out of control judges and providing the absolutely crucial checks and balances our founders intended.
3. I don’t support politicians who support a “pathway to citizenship” for those who have illegally invaded my country.
4. I don’t support politicians who want to hand off taxing authority and control over the world’s resources to the tyrants at the UN.
Other than a few wry comments and jokes on this thread concerning its ridiculous nature I’ve pretty much confined my criticism of Sarah Palin to those very important matters. For me, any one of them all by itself would be a deal killer for any candidate. And none of it has a single thing to do with Alan Keyes, as much as my detractors here would like it to be so.
Haley Barbour? Are you freakin’ kidding me? He should be running the RNC again... not running for President.
He also has a Congressman, veteran son with somewhat more charisma than his remarkable father.
That son happens to be turning 35, just before January 2013.
(that age ring any bells?)
Just saying.
So does Palin, except she calls it registration. In fact, their plan is the same.
Truth is we have no non amnesty candidates. Pence has always been against Cap and Trade. So has Barbour.
The Keyes/Tancredo supporters are just a minor annoyance.
The truly pathetic ones are Romney and the Romneybots because they hide in bunkers and hire mercenaries like Karl Rove to do their dirty work. Just a bunch of cowards.
Keyes may be “bright and articulate” but he makes small children cry... he’s also a very hateful, angry man and demonstrates it in his speeches.
The country will never get behind Alan Keyes... nor should they. Ideological purity is not the only standard to determine fitness for higher office.
FWIW, I wouldn’t vote for Paul either even if I agreed with him 100% of the time. He is a wild-eyed conspiracy theorist who should not be anywhere near the executive office. The fact that most of his support came from misguided college kids should be very telling.
Well then, that might be worth looking into.
I like German Shepherds, too.
You seem to have a comprehension problem. No where in that transcript does she say she is for amnesty. As far as registration, the point would be to locate them. It’s not a blanket amnesty as you insist.
This has all been discussed before on this forum. There is nothing here to dissuade me. You’ve proven absolutely nothing except you have a problem with a Palin presidency.
I’ve wondered how that age eligibility works.
If I’m not mistaken, Congressman Hunter (the son) turns 35 before January 2013, but after the 2012 election.
Hypothetically, is he eligible to run say, as VP on a Palin or Jindal ticket?
If the ticket wins, he’s 35 before they assume office.
Or is the requirement, to be 35 in order to be on the ballot?
Great post.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.