Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amazing Interview: Air Force General says "Sub Launched Missile, 100% Certain"
Fox News Interview with Air Force General Tom McInerney | November 14th 2010 | Fox News Hannity Interview

Posted on 11/13/2010 2:55:59 PM PST by DontTreadOnMe2009

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 861-880881-900901-920 ... 1,461 next last
To: muawiyah
How can I put this: your faith in math has blinded you to reality, just as the faith in math that folks had with regard to the "impossible" structure blinded them. I see you didn't address that point, nor did you give a simple five-word answer. You are the kind of person who believed your eyes were lyin' when you saw bumblebees fly, that is, until the "math" finally proved it out.

The "math" can prove flights, but the "math" can't disprove that the item in the video was a missile.

881 posted on 11/15/2010 5:20:31 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 870 | View Replies]

To: Finny
The people of Egypt believed for thousands of years that every time their nation was inundated by the Nile the mathematicians would readily relocate their property!

They were never misled.

Your shack will probably fall down ~ next time hire some engineers and architects who know math.

882 posted on 11/15/2010 5:23:28 PM PST by muawiyah (GIT OUT THE WAY ~ REPUBLICANS COMIN' THROUGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 881 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Mu, really -- explain to me how a TEAM of people doing the math could "prove," repeatedly, that a design for a structure would fall down; the structure was built and has been standing for five years. Maybe because they weren't stone-age Egyptians? Look, I respect math, I really do. It's mathemeticians I suspect.

Again: how about that five-word answer?

883 posted on 11/15/2010 5:23:41 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 880 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Make that standing for FIFTEEN years. It's not a shack, either. The mathematicians FINALLY got the math right and it was built in its original form; the structure didn't change -- the approach of the mathemeticians changed. Doubtless had the same structure been built before the mathemeticians gave their okay, it would have immediately collapsed, right? *rolls eyes*

And really, I won't even comment on the results, I just want to see your five-word answer.

884 posted on 11/15/2010 5:26:22 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 883 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

Good work.


885 posted on 11/15/2010 5:36:19 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 792 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

.
I’m glad that you’ve had a lobotomy.
.


886 posted on 11/15/2010 5:43:10 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I did. In fact, I listened TWICE.

Know what? NO ONE IN THE LINK YOU POST said "it was coming in the Est and going to the East."

Not the cameraman, not the two talking heads. NO ONE MADE THAT CLAIM.

One of the talking heads said the cameraman said he thought it looked like an incoming missile; from the Santa Monica area, something headed north-west would look incoming due to the curve of the coastline. Neither you nor I know if the cameraman actually said that, or if he said it and explained that while it may have looked "incoming" it was actually not, which is entirely within the realm of something he would say and how it would be misreported. Also, the camerman doesn't say he focused on the missile for ten minutes -- the talking head says the reporter "stayed on it" for ten minutes. The talking head is a boob who probably thinks filming the remains of a missile plume is the same as "staying on it." The cameraman, at least in this video, made no such claim, NOR did he OR ANYONE ELSE say it was east-bound.

The sun tells you where the missile was going. The sun tells you it was going in a north-westerly direction.

887 posted on 11/15/2010 5:46:32 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 871 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

.
> “Pretty good argument here that it was a plane”

.
The only similarities are that both were in the sky off California.

The differences:
One (the plane) was in bound to the east, while the missile was outward bound to the northwest.

The contrail was light and fluffy, while the missile exhaust was dense, and had the distinct color of potassium permanganate.
.


888 posted on 11/15/2010 5:57:03 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

Comment #889 Removed by Moderator

To: Finny
And they're taken from Long Beach, about 25 miles south-east (and behind a large and prominent Palos Verdes range of bluffs and hills) of where the video cameranan reportedly was.

More problems with the fake gif animation. UPS902 was never due west of Long Beach. Never close to where the sun set when viewed from Long Beach. Hawaii is southwest of Long Beach. That flight was coming up from the southwest. It was 35 miles south of Long Beach at 29-30 k feet altitude. The plume he imaged began near to sunset point from his perspective.

And how in the world can a photographer imaging the sunset catch a plane 35 miles to his south at 30 k altitidue so clearly and so large ? Especially when they have focused on the distant sunset plume ? Those images are real bad fakes. And you can rework the process he used. He connected the plane-like object to the plume, then distorted both while connected to the left. The plane object was on a programmed flight path. The plume was moving in the wind. They should not have moved together. Obvious cheap photoshop trick.

Live Flight Tracking

890 posted on 11/15/2010 5:58:36 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 803 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape; kanawa

Thanks, JHA. Kanawa, you might be interested in this.


891 posted on 11/15/2010 6:06:01 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 890 | View Replies]

To: DManA; Grut

.
> “Do you personally know something about the mental state of this man? If not it is just dispicable for you to smear him like that. For the sake of making a stupid joke on a chat site.”

.
You should be more familiar with this postor by now!

This is not a first.
.


892 posted on 11/15/2010 6:06:46 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
When you look at the area ABOVE the clouds, it's darker because it's SHADOWED by those clouds.

The entire contrail has the consistent dark and light pattern. Due to sunlight and self shading. The image from another event from December 31st has a cloud shading parts of its plume. But that is understandable, since it appears to be a plane. Perhaps you are confusing the two.

So, yes, that proves the object is traveling from West to East ~ and we know that because the cirrus clouds in the distance are between the contrail and the Sun over the horizon.

We have low lying clouds all the time here off the coast. Sometimes they even come down to sea level. Called marine layer and fog. Have even seen low lying clouds moving one direction, and higher clouds above them moving in the opposite direction. Welcome to the mountainous coastline of the largest ocean in the world.

893 posted on 11/15/2010 6:11:52 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 804 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape
I was flying into Dallas once upon a time and looked down at three layers of clouds all moving different directions.

I really was hoping our flight would go somewhere else quick!

894 posted on 11/15/2010 6:14:30 PM PST by muawiyah (GIT OUT THE WAY ~ REPUBLICANS COMIN' THROUGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 893 | View Replies]

To: DontTreadOnMe2009
could have been 60 or more miles out, no one knows ...

Right. Just have an estimated distance off the coast. And if you look at our coastline here, you know the statement 35 miles southwest of the coast, is about as ambiguous a location as one can get. What coastal point ?

895 posted on 11/15/2010 6:14:53 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 806 | View Replies]

To: dynoman; thecabal

.
> “This is basic “the earth is round” high school physics.”

.
No, this is basic shills trying to overpower logic and facts on Freerepublic. Its been going on here for over 13 years.
.


896 posted on 11/15/2010 6:16:43 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: DontTreadOnMe2009
Hе ѕаіd hе wаѕ aboard thе television station’s helicopter shooting footage οf thе sunset over thе ocean аbουt 5:15 p.m whеn hе noticed thе spiral-shaped vapor trail аnd zoomed Ñ–n tο gеt a better look.

Great. A reference point in time. First noticed at 5:15 pm. Said it was filmed for 10 minutes and he stated it was about 35 miles southwest of Los Angeles. So he stopped filming at about 5:25 when the event ended. Plane promoters assume the contrail stopped then. Flight UPS902 was located 50 miles due south of Malibu at 5:30:11 at an altitude of 30,000 feet. In 5 minutes a plane traveling 500-600 mph would have moved about 45 miles. So an event that began about 35 miles southwest of Los Angeles, should have been over the California mainland in 5 minutes time. Yet here we see it took 15 minutes for it to even get due south of Malibu. Now look at a map and draw a line from Long Beach to a point 50 miles south of Malibu. You will notice your viewing angle is about 45 degrees south of due west. Your background would not be anywhere near to the sunset, which was about 5-10 degrees south of due west.

897 posted on 11/15/2010 6:43:48 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 829 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
If the skies around LA are so busy, how come only 1 or 2 people in a helicopter reported a missile shot? IMHO this is the #1 reason to doubt the missile theory.

I posted a link to the SiteMonitor site where you can watch every single flight in LA airspace the entire day of the event. If you had bothered to look you would have seen that only two flights between 4:45 to 5:45 even came up from the southwest deep ocean into the Los Angeles basin. Two flights in one hour.

898 posted on 11/15/2010 6:48:00 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 831 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

So a plane moving 500-600 mph tracks perfectly with a plume being moved by a sea breeze. Right.


899 posted on 11/15/2010 6:49:19 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 837 | View Replies]

To: Ronald_Magnus
John Coleman got it wrong and so did WUWT. Big deal. They are only human. Simple case of jumping the gun before analyzing the visual lighting clues.

In summary - Incorrect conclusions based on partial data.

900 posted on 11/15/2010 6:55:04 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 842 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 861-880881-900901-920 ... 1,461 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson