Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rain clouds linger as Tea Party brews up a storm (Palin & Tea Party as Reagan redux?)
The Irish Times ^ | September 27, 2010 | Professor Richard Aldous

Posted on 09/26/2010 6:21:57 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

I have been telling everybody I know that I have been attending Tea Party protests and that I support their cause. So now people are coming to me, asking me what all that Tea Party stuff is about, usually with a hostile attitude. They are frustrated at the Tea Party’s success, and they want to prove that it is full of dangerous radicals.

This represents a great opportunity. I explain to them that I support the Tea Party because I think that expanding government spending is a bad idea, especially when the country is already so deeply in debt. I explain to them how removing capital from the market through government borrowing, and the looming taxes to pay for it all, is causing the recovery to stagnate.

I limit myself to this one point, and then point out that the Tea Partiers are the one group that in consistently against expanding federal spending, and that is why I support them. I talk about how all DC politicians, but especially the Democrats, use the excuse of Keynsean economic theory to do what they always want to do, which is to buy votes with our money. Even a dyed-in-the-wool Liberal has to admit that massive government spending is not working out in this particular case. At the end of the conversation, I have them agreeing with me, and agreeing that the Tea Party is not a radical organization at all.

So, when somebody asks you about the Tea Party, take it down a notch, and talk in measured tones. If we talk to “civilians” like we talk to each other, we wind up sounding like nut-jobs to their ears. I pick one point, and make it. If they bait me about Birtherism or social issues, I say I have no strong opinions, and stick to my main point. I think the most persuasive part of the conversation is that I am a Tea Partier, and I am also a polite and reasonable person. This completely destroys the MSM meme that we are all a bunch of raving lunatics.

And that will translate into votes in November.


81 posted on 09/27/2010 6:48:12 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (Anything not about elephants is irrelephant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Not a problem.


82 posted on 09/27/2010 8:17:40 AM PDT by no dems (DeMINT / PALIN 2012 or PALIN / DeMINT 2012.......Either is fine with me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
“Tea Party activists may not like Barack Obama, but they admire the way he won the last election, not least the “netroots” of political activists who helped him defeat an “establishment” machine candidate.”

???? I do not admire the way he won. His election showed that the US electorate was more interested in the color of a person's skin and not the person himself. If Obama had not been half black, and not had the SRM humping his leg, he would have never been elected dog catcher, let alone POTUS.

His election was a black eye on our country and a reminder up how many very stupid, socialist, race baiting people live here.

83 posted on 09/27/2010 4:13:04 PM PDT by mickey finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Yes, we already have a system it’s called the constitution
and the TEA party wants to go back to it. It’s that simple.


84 posted on 09/27/2010 4:25:51 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mmercier

.


85 posted on 09/27/2010 4:41:33 PM PDT by November 2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Chunga

Conservatives don’t support war unless it is for the protection of the US and is absolutely necessary. Conservatives were not very crazy about Bill Clinton using our military upon the orders of the UN to attack Serbia in protection of the Muslims in a civil war, for example.

Conservatives have been clear throughout the years that they do not want the US military being used as a UN military at the beck and call of foreign interests. I refer to the UN military globalist gang as the war wing.

Ron Paul is at the other extreme of the war wing. He would totally dismantle the US military so that self defense would be questionable.


86 posted on 09/27/2010 9:41:51 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: antceecee; phobia-dude
Has FR had another infiltration of PaulTards? They all sound like Lefties with some fascination for PAUL and hoping for free pot! These tools appear to have some retardation or pot head issues, to be 18-30 year old mostly male gamers aka conspiracy theorist in the vein of that AntiWar dude Alex whatever....scratch the surface of the PTs and I imagine you will find the typical 911 troofers and believers in the Illuminati, George Nouri and Star Wars junk.
87 posted on 09/30/2010 2:26:16 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson