Shirley Sherrod says she will sue Andrew Breitbart

Hotair ^ | 07/29/2010 | Ed Morrissey

[CharlesWayneCT]

Imagine if political candidates could sue their opponents any time the opponent used a clip from a speech that also had things that countered that clip?

This new argument that anybody making a political point must of necessity also make the countervaling point for their opponent is stupid. In California, the LA times criticized a republican candidate for telling the truth in an ad, but not including additional information that might have mitigated the damage the truth did to the democrat.

[silverleaf]

Isn’t every video used on every newscast on every TV station -”edited”?

Should be an interesting trial, to figure out exactly who ordered her fired and whether everyone in that chain watched the entire video before announcing their decision.

GO ANDREW.

[chris37]

Oh, very, very carefully.

I answered the questions of a mongrel’s defense attorney in such a way to get me off jury duty, so I figure I can answer the questions of a mongrel’s defense attorney in such a way to get me on that jury.

I am a crafty cracker. I know that attorney’s for mongrels question jurors in an effort to remove those who would convict and retain those who would acquit. Knowing such motivations allows the crafty cracker to fashion the proper answer.

Infiltrate, nullify. Shut these mongrels down in court from the inside.

[whence911]

BTTT

[prairiebreeze]

Ol’ Shirley is quite the litigation thug-ette, isn’t she...

[I_Like_Spam]

Where are Sherrod’s damages?

Even if one’s assumes that Breitbart wronged her in some way, you have to actually suffer damages in order to collect, no?

[Ann Archy]

Was Andrew SET UP??? WHO gave the tape to ANDREW?? Did they give the WHOLE TAPE??

[jpl]

Not only did she not suffer any real damages, she ended up getting offered an even better government goldbricking job than the one she had before!