Skip to comments.
Victor Davis Hanson: Obama’s Real Problem - Why the president’s poll numbers have declined.
NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE ^
| July 28, 2010
| Victor Davis Hanson
Posted on 07/28/2010 9:53:17 AM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
1
posted on
07/28/2010 9:53:25 AM PDT
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
I like Hanson’s columns in general, but I don’t buy Obama’s poll losses are because he isn’t liberal enough. Most of his recent losses are from independents who tend to be more moderate than lib. Yes he is losing some dems as well but probably more of the moderate dems who are among the working class who are getting nailed by the recession, not the limo libs.
To: neverdem
I have no doubt that O will be re-elected.
The average American doesn’t realize the damage he is doing to the country.
I just lectured to people at the CIA about the state of the economy (but was told not to mention politics). Instead, I said the bank industry is dead and on life support and the banking bill only made matters worse.
To: neverdem
I have no doubt that O will be re-elected.
The average American doesn’t realize the damage he is doing to the country.
I just lectured to people at the CIA about the state of the economy (but was told not to mention politics). Instead, I said the bank industry is dead and on life support and the banking bill only made matters worse.
To: neverdem; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; FromLori; Gilbo_3; NFHale; ...
RE :”
According to a popular myth, President Obamas declining poll numbers are a consequence of his failure to be liberal enough. On race, in the wake of the Shirley Sherrod mess, we are told he needs to appoint more African Americans and bring in more advisers from the black community. On the economy, liberal economists decry his unwillingness to borrow and stimulate more. .....
First, the voters in 2008 did not vote for liberal change, but for change from the costly and lengthy Bush wars, deficits, spending policies, and immigration proposals. Obama voters were also motivated by a desire to elect our first African-American president, fear over the September 2008 financial meltdown, a lackluster McCain campaign, and the strange perception that Obama was a centrist.
Since his election, Obama has outdone the average Bush deficits by a factor of four or five...”
A good analysis!
5
posted on
07/28/2010 10:02:41 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
To: whitedog57
no ... zero will NOT be re-elected ... instead his own democratic party (secret leadership) has ALREADY decided that zero is finished ... zero will be DENIED even the opportunity to campaign in the democratic primaries ...
To: drangundsturm
His point is the ‘Obama’s policies aren’t liberal enough’ line is a myth.
7
posted on
07/28/2010 10:05:24 AM PDT
by
skeeter
To: Patton@Bastogne
8
posted on
07/28/2010 10:05:27 AM PDT
by
JustAmy
(Remove Boxer, Pelosi and Reid. Vote to stop Socialism.)
To: drangundsturm
Did you read the column? The whole point is that Hanson doesn’t buy that O’s poll losses are because he isn’t “liberal” enough, but that his deluded supporters, whether among his “czars”, in the media or among the nutroots think that.
9
posted on
07/28/2010 10:07:26 AM PDT
by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: drangundsturm
Hansen said just the opposite, i.e. that attributing his poll decline to not being liberal enough “is lunatic in political terms.”
10
posted on
07/28/2010 10:10:15 AM PDT
by
HerrBlucher
(In the White House the mighty White House the Liar sleeps tonight.............)
To: neverdem
During the campaign process and the actual Presidential election, “O’s” image (we ALL know how) was polished to a blinding veneer. All the flaws (and what candidate is without them) were glossed over, minimized, swept under the carpet... etc... and the man was made into some sort of ‘golden child’ no rational person could reject.
Well...
There is NO cocktail so unwholesome and ruinous as anything the MSM and its political ally are capable of producing when so motivated. And they WERE motivated. McCain was beatable and THAT was all the MSM needed to know. The “O” administration is the perfect political storm for the US.
Unfortunately for “O”, storms expose as much as they destroy.
“O” is flagging with Americans now, because much of his character which was whitewashed during the campaign, is now obvious. Some people REALLY need a house to fall on them.
11
posted on
07/28/2010 10:10:25 AM PDT
by
SMARTY
("What luck for rulers that men do not think." Adolph Hitler)
To: whitedog57
I believe you are correct about the average American, but I BELIEVE THEY ARE WAKING-UP. OBOZO IS dead meat but like a corpse the smell will continue for a while.
12
posted on
07/28/2010 10:13:38 AM PDT
by
hejahale
(No)
To: whitedog57
“I have no doubt that O will be re-elected.”
My money’s with you. If the gop had someone who could attract independents and keep the conservative base fired up, the slug presently in the WH likely wouldn’t win reelection, but no doubt the msm will make sure the gop chooses another Bob Dole to run in 2012. We’ll just have to wait and see how this plays out.
13
posted on
07/28/2010 10:15:12 AM PDT
by
rj45mis
To: SMARTY
“some sort of golden child no rational person could reject.”
What? Are you implying I’m not rational? :-)
14
posted on
07/28/2010 10:16:47 AM PDT
by
rj45mis
To: whitedog57
If the CIA does not understand what politics are at play here... why are they working for the CIA? It seems obvious to anyone that is not ideologically aligned with satan and his son.
LLS
15
posted on
07/28/2010 10:19:54 AM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
( WOLVERINES!)
To: whitedog57
The only way Obama can get reelected is if the economy somehow miraculously recovers by 2012. IMHO we will be in a full blown depression by then, with official unemployment in the high teens, and true unemployment double that. People simply won’t put up with it.
16
posted on
07/28/2010 10:26:56 AM PDT
by
Hugin
(Remember the first rule of gunfighting...have a gun..-- Col. Jeff Cooper)
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: neverdem
Little will change until MSM starts realizing their contribution toward the destruction of our society.
If media were doing it's job the Obama team would already be neutralized
18
posted on
07/28/2010 10:33:58 AM PDT
by
Joan Kerrey
(here's my checkbook and my car-keys, my credit carThe bigger the government = The smaller the people)
To: drangundsturm
I like Hansons columns in general, but I dont buy Obamas poll losses are because he isnt liberal enough.Where did he say that?
19
posted on
07/28/2010 10:35:20 AM PDT
by
houeto
(Get drinking water from your ditch - http://www.junglebucket.com/Jungle-Bucket-1.htm)
To: neverdem
His problem is more fundamental: It is one of self-knowledge.There, fixed the only thing wrong with the article.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson