is this necessarily a bad thing??
i am not standing up for sherrod just thing out loud- if she sued Brietbart wouldn’t she be opening up the pandora’s box for future suits against liberal media outlets that constantly twist stories and facts against conservatives in a way 100 times worse than what we’ve seen???
He's got the goods on somebody (or multiple somebodys), so if the lefties can attack his credibility now, who's going to believe him when he dumps his can of worms on the table?
They just want to provide their wholely-owned subsidiary media puppets with fodder to discredit him when he drops more of this kind of stuff on us.
Legal action because he PLAYED A PORTION OF HER OWN SPEECH AND HER OWN WORDS!!! Well that is indeed what the left considers and egregious, despicable attack...telling the truth about the left.
Of course she will sue, what better way to get Breitbart busy with dealing with this nonsense instead of having him focusing on bringing out the truth about progressives and this administration?
Bring it, honey.
They have another distraction here.
What’s going on behind the curtains?
These guys have been threatening him for at least a year now. Sue him, shut him down, arrest him.. Alinsky tactics for all to see.
For what, you dumb racist b****?
Briebart is white, now isn’t he? Hmm.....
Bring it on, Bitch!
Trying to scare people from reporting the truth?
Just another nail in the coffin of free speech.
What about the person who gave Breitbart the excerpt? It had to be someone in the NAACP and they had to know how the whole speech compared to the excerpt. Is she going to sue them?
yup.. this smells like she’s setting up a Fed Lawsuit to her benefit. Hey, Federal Government acting all superior on her you know..
This racist woman is doing a helluva job turning what positive image she had into a mass of negatives.
i think it was a setup of Breitbart- but he STILL played it masterfully
The white house even fell for it
Breitbart correctly pointed out that the NAACP audience id the bigger issue here- when she was explaining how she acted racist toward some white farmers they were ALL FOR IT!
go ahead and try. You don’t have a leg to stand, even if your middle name is Eileen.
You did say it, you did do it and even admitted such. Your audience was cheering your reprehensible story at that exact moment and it is who they are and what views they hold.
That was the point of the video, not your come to Jesus moment some 20 minutes later in the story, which seemed contrived, at best.
How? The tape was made in a meeting and you knew it was.Breibart did not edit it as the left is telling everyone. Go ahead and waste your money Breibart will beat you like a cheap drum.
The American people should demand an investigation into just how Shakedown Shirley
and Charlie Sherrod managed to grab $ 300,000 from the taxpayers for their
“ pain and suffering “ in July 2009,
during the reign of Barry.
There may also be an unspecified amount in forgiveness of debt.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/Examiner-Opinion-Zone/Shirley-Sherrods-Disappearing-Act-Not-So-Fast-98846149.html#ixzz0uSYtTiPL
An audit should be conducted into the 13 million Barry
gave Shakedown Shirley’s “ New Communities “ foundation last year.
Ditto the 1 billion ( that’s a “ B “ ) that taxpayers have paid black farmers and those
who “ attempted to farm “ in what amounts to reparations.
A bunch of wimpy hand ringers on the right got snookered and faint yesterday
and threw Breitbart under the bus without doing due diligence
on Shakedown Shirley’s full , anti white, anti Republican , racist NAACP speech.
I understand that Rush was not one of the hand wringers and saw through Shirley’s phony redemption speech.
Good for him.