Skip to comments.
US to begin profiling air passengers
Nine News ^
| April 2, 2010
Posted on 04/02/2010 5:54:34 AM PDT by myknowledge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last





Sometimes we wished more Muslims would be scrutinized by racial profiling, but the Muzzies have known a solution to evading racial profiling: Use of non-Arab looking Muslims e.g. Bosniaks to penetrate airport security.
Obama and the TSA could also use profiling to target any suspected government opponents, like us.
Fascist Police State 101!
To: myknowledge
2
posted on
04/02/2010 5:56:37 AM PDT
by
OKSooner
To: OKSooner
3
posted on
04/02/2010 5:57:51 AM PDT
by
myknowledge
(B.H. Obama's just a frontman. A frontman for who? The globalist elite, stupid!)
To: myknowledge
But what about the old ladies in wheelchairs! /SAR
4
posted on
04/02/2010 5:59:46 AM PDT
by
TSgt
(When the government fears the people, there is liberty. - Thomas Jefferson)
To: MikeWUSAF
5
posted on
04/02/2010 6:03:10 AM PDT
by
relictele
(Obama: foolish enough to argue with a dictionary and arrogant enought to claim victory.))
To: relictele
Can anyone imagine if GWB had instituted this? THe outcry would ring from sea to shining sea.
Frankly, I don’t believe this.
6
posted on
04/02/2010 6:04:56 AM PDT
by
cajungirl
To: myknowledge
Does this mean Hussein Obama will be flagged?
7
posted on
04/02/2010 6:06:45 AM PDT
by
bytesmith
To: myknowledge
The measures will replace mandatory enhanced screening of all passengers travelling to the United States from 14 mostly Muslim nations, put into place following a failed al-Qaeda attempt to blow up a Detroit-bound flight on Christmas Day. [above misspelling(s) not mine]
I seriously doubt they ever had enhanced screenings for people from mostly Muslim nations.
8
posted on
04/02/2010 6:12:17 AM PDT
by
FourPeas
(God Bless America)
To: myknowledge
“This is not a system that can be called profiling in the traditional sense. It is intelligence-based,” said the official, quoted by the New York Times.
____________________________________________________________
Funny. Are they admitting they were wrong and are looking for a figleaf, now that Obama would be totally $#(@) if there was a major terrorist attack that succeeded?
9
posted on
04/02/2010 6:15:31 AM PDT
by
Woebama
(Never, never, never quit)
To: Woebama
And scary that I assume the NYT is an official spokesman for the liberals that now control the US government.
10
posted on
04/02/2010 6:16:14 AM PDT
by
Woebama
(Never, never, never quit)
To: bytesmith
No, because he is a frontman for the globalist elite, and they want Christians and government opponents red-flagged.
11
posted on
04/02/2010 6:16:38 AM PDT
by
myknowledge
(B.H. Obama's just a frontman. A frontman for who? The globalist elite, stupid!)
To: myknowledge
This type of screening didn't work???????

To: myknowledge
About 8 years too late, but better late than never ehh?
To: mainsail that
Of course it didn't work, it simply targeted the wrong people!
Fascist Police State 101!
14
posted on
04/02/2010 6:35:10 AM PDT
by
myknowledge
(B.H. Obama's just a frontman. A frontman for who? The globalist elite, stupid!)
To: mrsixpack36
I trust absolutely nothing this Regime does.
15
posted on
04/02/2010 6:36:14 AM PDT
by
unkus
To: myknowledge
This couldn't even be MENTIONED in a Republican administration, much less implemented.
The media would KILL a Republican for this.
16
posted on
04/02/2010 6:36:40 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
To: Lazamataz
To: mrsixpack36
All the billions spent on high tech and personnel, and now a little bit of common sense?
To: mainsail that
Precisely. Only Republicans can open dialogues with Communist countries. Only Democrats (if so inclined) can reform Welfare.
Obama trying to be an outright Communist should not be the model. Only a Republican can be used to impose communism.
19
posted on
04/02/2010 6:40:22 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
To: mainsail that
Now we know why Julie Nixon Eisenhower made her 2008 endorsement.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson