Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I'm posting a piece from the liberal New Republic because I think conservatives should be prepared to counter an assault on the Supreme Court, especially if the Slaughter scheme is used to pass Obamacare without a vote and the Supreme Court hears a challenge to its constitionality.

I think Rosen is wrong about the politics. Obama is not popular, especially among non-black voters who judge him based on his performance rather than his race. I bet the Supreme Court is more respected than Congress.

1 posted on 03/17/2010 7:15:42 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: reaganaut1

The character of a man shows in his enemies, and John Roberts’ character shines through Obama’s cheap-shot shenanigans.


36 posted on 03/17/2010 8:30:50 AM PDT by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines, RVN '69 - St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Thank God for John Roberts! I knew he wouldn’t turn out to be another wimpy traitor like Souter.


37 posted on 03/17/2010 8:31:00 AM PDT by FenwickBabbitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
...Last week, the chief justice described the president’s State of the Union condemnation of the Citizens United decision as “very troubling” and complained that the speech had “degenerated to a political pep rally.” Roberts was making an argument about etiquette--dissent was fine, he said, but Obama had somehow transgressed the boundaries of civilized discourse by delivering his attack to a captive audience. But he was implicitly making a political argument as well

Idiot - no he wasn't.

Roberts simply stated that there was a place for dissent - and that the STOTU speach was not the place.

39 posted on 03/17/2010 10:59:19 AM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
In battles between a popular president and an anti-majoritarian Court...

Stopped right there.
41 posted on 03/17/2010 1:44:27 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1; TexasNative2000
I'm posting a piece from the liberal New Republic because I think conservatives should be prepared to counter an assault on the Supreme Court, especially if the Slaughter scheme is used to pass Obamacare without a vote and the Supreme Court hears a challenge to its constitionality.

Excellent reasoning, guys. There's always a reason, when the 'Rats start squeaking in unison about something or someone.

Scholars 200 years from now will have a fine old time dissecting the Great Rat Conspiracy in politics and media. Assuming they're free to study and aren't locked down in a police state.

42 posted on 03/17/2010 5:14:45 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson