Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC and CBS Call the Food Police for 'Misleading Labels'
Newsbusters ^ | 03/04/10 | Anthony Kang

Posted on 03/04/2010 11:16:52 AM PST by 198ml

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Mase

Mistakes come after approval too. Some are on purpose. Most of the labeling mistakes I see are on foreign products shipped here. They are quite sloppy so my conclusion is that enforcement is nil

If your pea sized brain can only grasp big main stream food processors doing it correctly and honestly, fine. They are just part of the story


21 posted on 03/04/2010 1:30:47 PM PST by dennisw (It all comes 'round again --Fairport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Here's what you said, Mensa:

I don't care if it's a domestic packer or a foreign one. It doesn't matter if they are big or small. Labeling requirements are heavily regulated and enforced. Any organization willfully misrepresenting their ingredient table will pay huge fines (if they're domestic) and remain under the burden and expense of the FDA microscope. If they are foreign, their products may be banned altogether. Foreign suppliers must still meet our stringent labeling requirements. Our food importing regulations state:

To say, like you so ignorantly did, that ingredients are "often" (now you've changed it to "some" - LOL!) not listed in order of predominance, and that any mislabeling is done to "trick" the consumer is laughable and totally unsupported by your posts on this thread. You say you read the labels but you don't know shinola about what you're reading. You wouldn't have a clue if the ingredient table was accurate or not. You use the word "sloppy" to describe the labeling of imports but you have no experience with this that would give you any credibility for arriving at such a conclusion. This is just another example of you jumping in on something that you don't know jack squat about and then running in reverse as fast as you can when someone calls you on it. You anti-industry, bigger government populist conservatives sure like to complain about things you know nothing about.

22 posted on 03/04/2010 2:25:09 PM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mase

You are truly an idiot....foreign products often have sloppy labels with ingredients in the wrong order being one of the problems. I have seen them and read them. I doubt you ever have. You are talking about matters you have no direct knowledge of


23 posted on 03/04/2010 4:45:09 PM PST by dennisw (It all comes 'round again --Fairport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mase

http://www.cspinet.org/new/200510272.html

* Quaker Oats Pasta Roni — the label boasts White Cheddar & Broccoli in large letters and displays a picture of pasta with pieces of broccoli. Although broccoli appears on the fourth line of a 14-line ingredient list, there are only small specks of broccoli in the actual package.

“Budget cuts have decimated the number of FDA regulators working on food labeling, while their responsibilities for monitoring the way food is packaged and marketed have increased substantially,” said Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), ranking member of the Appropriations subcommittee that sets the FDA budget. “We must do everything we can to encourage healthy eating and reduce obesity in this country by restoring integrity to the FDA and empowering people to make informed decisions about the foods they are eating. The FDA must investigate l


24 posted on 03/04/2010 4:52:32 PM PST by dennisw (It all comes 'round again --Fairport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mase

Review of thousands of food items leads companies to pull products from shelves

December 30, 2008 By Sam Roe and Ted Gregory

Some supermarkets, gourmet shops and bakeries routinely sell mislabeled products that pose a danger to children with food allergies, according to Chicago Tribune testing and a comprehensive check of grocery aisles. When informed of the findings, more than a dozen companies and stores said they would remove products from shelves or fix labels to properly disclose all ingredients.

In one of the nation's largest examinations of undisclosed ingredients in food, the Tribune reviewed thousands of items at 60 locations in or near Chicago, finding dozens of products obviously mislabeled. The newspaper also conducted 50 laboratory tests - more than the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration combined over the last several years - to determine precise ingredients.

The newspaper's wide-ranging examination stretched from chain groceries in Naperville, Ill., to ethnic stores in Chicago's Pilsen neighborhood to specialty shops in downtown Chicago. In the end, the Tribune identified 117 products that appear to violate federal food labeling laws.

Following previous Tribune reports that showed how government and industry fail to root out hidden allergens, this examination reveals the alarming scope of the problem.

The findings also offer lessons for parents trying to protect their children, from how to spot mislabeled food to which kinds of products are more likely to be tainted.

UNSEEN ALLERGENS

No. 1: Label errors abound

Parents should know that many product labels contain flaws that mask major allergens.

Eight foods - milk, eggs, wheat, soy, peanuts, tree nuts, fish and shellfish - account for 90 percent of food allergies. That's why federal law requires ingredient labels to disclose them.

Yet the Tribune found numerous examples of those ingredients not being declared, such as in Frontier Soups Cincinnati Chili mix, sold at Arista Foods on May Street in Chicago.

Milk is not listed on the label, but when the Tribune sent the product to a University of Nebraska laboratory specializing in allergens, tests showed the chili mix contained milk. Frontier owner Trisha Anderson said milk likely slipped into the chili mix through cross-contamination during manufacturing. "We will change our labeling to reflect this allergen information," she said.

The newspaper also found more than a dozen products with incomplete labels that, for example, simply list "flour" as an ingredient. If an item contains, say, wheat flour, the packaging must say so.

Likewise, if a label discloses "butter," it must also state "milk." The law was written that way partly because many children with allergies must check labels themselves and cannot be expected to know the sub-ingredients in foods.

When the Tribune alerted manufacturers of the incomplete labels, several said they would remove the products from shelves or, like Frontier, amend labels.

Seattle-based Theo Chocolate said it planned a national recall of its Caramel Collection candy after the newspaper informed the company that its labels disclosed "organic butter" but not milk. The company said 5,000 individual packages, sold at the Whole Foods Market grocery chain, would be recalled shortly.

"It comes down to doing the right thing," said Andy McShea, Theo's chief operating officer.

The Tribune also found that Eddie's New York City Gourmet Pizza Slices listed flour in its ingredients without specifying the kind. Tests at the Nebraska lab showed the pizza contained 5,000 parts per million of gluten, indicating the presence of wheat, rye or barley.

California-based Safeway Inc., which owns the Dominick's grocery chain, said it would remove the pizza slices from about 60 stores across the country, including 10 Dominick's in the Chicago area. Efforts to reach Eddie's J2 Broadway's NYC Flying Pizza Co., the Brooklyn company that produces the pizza, were unsuccessful.

Not all companies were quick to act.

Tribune testing found Kodiak Cakes Big Bear Brownies mix contained milk, which is not disclosed on the label. Joel Clark, president of Baker Mills, the Salt Lake City company that makes the mix, said the amount found in the Tribune test - 940 parts per million - was too small to warrant a recall.

"At that level, I think we're OK, to be honest," he said.

In fact, federal law states that all ingredients - including allergens - must be disclosed on labels. Moreover, experts believe there is no safe level of allergens for people sensitive to them.

Told of this, Clark said he was considering placing an allergen advisory on the box.

___

No. 2: Technically, some labels confuse

Parents should understand the scientific terms used for major allergens.

Ingredient statements are not supposed to use technical terms for common allergens, such as "durum semolina" for wheat or "whey" for milk - again to protect children reading labels. But the Tribune found a dozen examples of that violation.

At a Jewel-Osco on West 103rd Street in Chicago, and at other retail outlets, the Tribune found Lund's Swedish Pancake Mix that listed "whey powder" without listing milk. Lab results showed the mix contained 5,000 parts per million of milk.

"I understand the severity of these situations," said Scott Buhl, executive vice president of Chicago-based Noon Hour Food Products, which produces the mix. "We should be labeling this as milk. We'll make that change right away."

Jewel-Osco spokesman Miguel Alba said the chain would pull the pancake mix from 185 stores in the Midwest. The supermarket chain also said it would pull Violet Crumble bars from the same stores after the Tribune found the labels disclosed "whey powder" but not milk. The candy, a chocolate-covered honeycomb, is made by Nestle Australia Ltd.

Spokeswoman Fran Hernon said the company stopped producing the candy for U.S. export late last year.

Several other companies said they would pull products or change labels after the newspaper found labels listing "durum semolina" or "spelt" without noting that means wheat.

Among them: Toronto-based ShaSha Co., maker of Ginger Snaps, which lists "spelt flour" on the ingredient label. Owner Shaun Navazesh said he would change the labels but not recall the cookies because he could not afford the financial setback.

"Our low sales already have forced us to shut down for more than two weeks," he said.

___

No. 3: Oats are often tainted with wheat

Parents of children with wheat allergies or celiac disease should steer clear of oats.

The Tribune tested six brands of oat cereal, and all had hidden gluten, most likely traces of wheat or barley.

Experts say it is difficult to keep wheat out of oats because farmers often grow the crops side by side. A little wind, and oats can become tainted with wheat.

Cross-contamination also can occur when farmers use the same equipment to harvest, store and transport wheat and oats.

By law, labels are required to disclose only ingredients in the product's formulation. Substances that might slip in through cross-contamination do not have to be declared, though more and more companies are putting such warnings on labels.

Tricia Thompson, author of "The Gluten-Free Nutrition Guide," said many people suffering from celiac disease, which can cause severe stomach cramps, know to avoid oats. But oat products, she said, should warn that they might contain wheat, rye or barley.

None of the six oatmeal products tested by the Tribune clearly warned consumers about the possibility of wheat, a major allergen.

But after the Tribune informed New York-based HappyFamily that its HappyBellies Oatmeal Cereal contained gluten, Chief Operating Officer Jessica Rolph said she would relabel the product.

She added that consumers have been asking her company whether the cereal contains wheat. "Parents are definitely concerned about this," Rolph said.

The oats that tested highest for gluten in the Tribune examination were made by the Quaker Oats Co. Spokeswoman Candace Mueller said Quaker is aware that cross-contamination can occur in its oats, but "we are confident that our labels are accurate and our products are safe."

___

No. 4: Beware of imports

Parents should know that imports are often unchecked and mislabeled.

The Tribune found imports with incomplete labels or ingredients listed in other languages - each a violation of the law.

Among the examples: Valencianos Artisanal Crackers, manufactured in Spain and sold at Whole Foods.

The distributor, Forever Cheese of Long Island City, N.Y., initially maintained that the rules didn't apply to the firm because it imports only a small volume of the crackers.

But the FDA said the rules do apply, regardless of how much is imported.

When told that, Forever Cheese acknowledged that the packages were mislabeled and would be fixed. Whole Foods said it would pull the Valencianos crackers from shelves nationwide.

Over the last 10 years, at least 1 in 7 recalls for undeclared allergens by the FDA and USDA involved imported food, a Tribune database shows. Most products were from China, where, experts say, there are few rules regarding labeling.

New York state authorities test many imports for mislabeled food, but few other regulators do. With limited checks on foreign labels, many imports pose a significant risk to U.S. children with allergies.

"If I had a food allergy, I wouldn't eat imported foods," said Dan Rice, director of the New York state food laboratory.

___

No. 5: Skip unlabeled food

Parents should not guess the ingredients in unlabeled food; common allergens can exist in unlikely products.

Retail food made to order, such as deli sandwiches, or single items in bins, such as bagels, don't need to have labels. But packaged foods must.

The Tribune found 74 different packaged products sold without labels, including an array of baked goods at County Fair Foods in Chicago's Beverly neighborhood and at Casey's Foods in Naperville.

Tests on County Fair cookies showed that they contained milk and eggs.

County Fair President Tom Baffes said he was unaware of the requirement. "We've talked about it from time to time," he said of listing ingredients on labels, "and it's just something that we have to take the time to do."

Baffes said that occasionally a customer will ask about allergens in the cookies, rolls and muffins produced there. Staff members typically then check, he said.

The store will begin listing ingredients on the baked goods, Baffes said, adding, "I think it's a good idea to have it out there."

Casey's manager Kevin Killelea noted that the store has allergen advisory signs in the bakery, a measure he thought met the legal requirements.

"If this isn't where we're supposed to be with this, we want to protect the customers," he said, adding that he would contact the FDA. "If it means that we must put it on our labels, then that's what we're going to do."


25 posted on 03/04/2010 4:57:04 PM PST by dennisw (It all comes 'round again --Fairport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
CSPI? LOL!

Why not EPI or CPUSA? They have just as much credibility.

26 posted on 03/04/2010 5:29:17 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
ROFLMAO!

An anti-business, big government populist conservative links to a socialist nanny state website designed to create alarm and fear among general public to usher in more government control of the economy. Nice.

I'm waiting for your rant about Benedict Arnold CEO's, evil Big Food, Big Oil, Big Insurance, Big Tobacco, Big Pharma and so on. You use Google as a substitute for subject knowledge and critical thinking skills. You use liberal sources of media to support your stupidity and ignorance comforted by the knowledge that you and them share the same dislike for American industry. Therefore, you willingly accept anything they tell you, without question, because you don't have any experience and want, in the worst way, to believe what they tell you is true. Kindred spirits talking out of their collectivist butts for the very same purpose. Just another brain dead redneck populist demanding bigger government protect him from the things he has no idea how to protect himself from on his own.

27 posted on 03/04/2010 5:40:05 PM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

You need to be sent to an Afghanistan re-education camp


28 posted on 03/04/2010 5:55:35 PM PST by dennisw (It all comes 'round again --Fairport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Would that make me believe your left wing sources?


29 posted on 03/04/2010 6:18:17 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Hey Dennis: I read your leftist rant about allergens. Did you know the feds didn't even begin requiring labels to list allergens until 2006? When was this study done, 2007? 2008? Do you have any idea the amount of operational changes that had to take place to accommodate these new mandates? Did they measure for these allergens in all these products in parts per million or in parts per billion? I can find all sorts of violations if you choose to measure in picograms. How convenient for the industry haters that they only had to list two measurements out of all the tests they did with one of the two being harmless. Most people who have no idea what they're talking about would read this and wring their hands in fear. Sound familiar?

I see your lefty friends at the Trib covered themselves by making the obligatory CYA in claiming experts believe there is no safe level of allergens for people sensitive to them. Yeah, right. People die every day when consuming foods containing one part per trillion of an allergen. Pick up any paper and you'll read about some poor sap suffering and then dying because some allergen was improperly labeled.Sure.

I didn't see one anecdote that anyone could consider being done "on purpose." Are you so daft that you believe a manufacturer would intentionally leave milk off the label so they might kill or injure some poor kid with an allergy to it? What's the upside for the processor to not comply with this particular labeling law? Did you ever stop and ask yourself that question? Businesses do things like this intentionally so they hurt their customers, attract massive media attention to what they did and get sued out of business by hordes of trial lawyers? Yup, that's what every business strives for. By the way, what person with an allergy to milk looks at a label, sees butter, and then consumes the product? Just how much government does it take to protect idiots from themselves?

30 posted on 03/04/2010 6:56:03 PM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mase

You should be sent to Afghanistan to harvest opium poppies with the girls


31 posted on 03/04/2010 7:01:11 PM PST by dennisw (It all comes 'round again --Fairport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mase

My simple point was there was mislabeling going on and sloppiness. You claimed there was no such thing because the penalties are too high


32 posted on 03/04/2010 7:03:29 PM PST by dennisw (It all comes 'round again --Fairport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Nice backtracking. Here's what you said:

These are claims that you are woefully incapable of supporting. You can't support them because they are not true. Mistakes happen, albeit rarely, but when you consider just how many food products we produce and import it is apparent that this is one industry that polices itself very well. Mistakes happen. They happen in every industry. But these are, for the most part, not intentional. The price you have to pay for these kinds of mistakes is a powerful deterrent. That's my point and I have 25 years in the industry to back it up.

If, like your leftist source, you want to measure in the right increment, I can find violations all day long. Some sense of proportion is required to look at this issue objectively. People with no knowledge of the subject, and those wed to an anti-business ideology, are usually the first to condemn based on whatever information the MSM spoon feeds them. Conservatives should be skeptical of this MO by nature. Bashing business is expected from the left. Raging against the private sector is for people who don't have a clue as to which side their bread is buttered. I see far too much of this coming from people who consider themselves conservative and it's all populist BS that ends up delivering bigger government.

33 posted on 03/04/2010 7:21:11 PM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson