Posted on 12/04/2009 8:07:39 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
I think you struck a nerve.
Then why the comparison? You argue using untruths.
No, that is not so for evolution and AGW. Perhaps you’ll see...
To refute yours, which displayed an equal degree of truth.
That's not what the article is about, but that is what the thread has deteriorated into.
As usual, the evolutionists have swarmed the thread, not to discuss the merits of the article, or the conclusions of the researchers, but to turn it into another religious spit wad war, a very common occurrence on the threads that GGG posts.
Their tactic very clearly seems to be to derail the thread and then complain that it's about religion, which they turned it into.
Since their participation on these threads usually amounts to no more than attacks on people's religious beliefs and causing sectarian infighting, one is forced to conclude that that was there whole intent from the start.
It's really simple. If the evos don't like these threads, they can just ignore them and leave us to what they think is our own delusions.
Nobody is forcing them to read these threads and GGG is not pinging them to them. They find them on their own and it's a feeding frenzy from there.
You coming into this thread (and others) to dispute what coincides with Genesis and Gods Creation does equate to you calling into question.
My statements and posts are based on what the Bible says. I can show this to be true. Evolution is a hoax. TRUTH.
God created all (animals - man)as they are, TRUTH.
Crikey!
Which one?
>> According to creationists, fossils are simply stones that fell from the moon.
In recent years theyve decided that fossils are the remains of animals from Noahs flood that managed to die, then sort themselves in rock strata in an orderly fashion.
I think the moon stones story is more interesting but thats just me. <<
Because you see the simplest animals died first cause they were so simple and they drifted downward.... Of course why did all those fossilized fish die off in the flood, I mean they ARE fish, you would think they would have survived, or some of them would have survived, of course this will give more ammo to the theories and they will think the Caelocanth is a lucky “great flood survivor”...
Those trilobites had it really bad in the great flood, they all died out with the dinosaurs not to mention all of the other water capable Cambrian critters that bit it in the flood.
Since 99.9999999999% of species that have existed are now extinct I guess before the flood it was “wall to wall” animals all over the earth and in the sea. It is a wonder Noah had any room to build the ark, and if he put two of every existing species, that Ark must have been the size of Texas. If Noah did put two of every species, then why are any animals extinct from the flood then? Did the Carnivores on the boat get hungry?
“Spooky interaction at a distance”
;-)
Perhaps you might want to draw some distinctions?
Gnosticism is Satan’s crown jewel, because it permeates so many groups, clubs, churches, and secret societies.
If you read Revelation chapter 2 and three, you will see that God declares that there is no perfect church, but he did promise the Philadelphians that they would not suffer the hour of temptation.
Duh!
Scientology most definitely is—admitted to by LRH himself.
LOL!
What, no love for Natural Law?
Your point?
I think the screen name should be ‘roadpizza’
Natural Law, you get all the love you deserve, LOL.
“I have no idea what you are talking about.”
You have no idea what anyone is talking about, ever! - So why do you keep jumping into something that you know that you don’t understand?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.