Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elderly Gatekeepers
Fox News | 10/09/2009 | Self

Posted on 11/08/2009 7:09:00 AM PST by Mike Darancette

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: Logic n' Reason
"age discrimination"

The rules don't apply to liberals anyway.

21 posted on 11/08/2009 7:47:30 AM PST by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wbones8765
Probably use us for parts!!!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

And the discarded remnants will become solyent green.

22 posted on 11/08/2009 7:48:39 AM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

“Come; just walk through the gate.”

It will more than likely...”Grandma, the gate is closed on that stent, or that hip replacement. turn around an go home.”

Otherwise why have any gate at all?


23 posted on 11/08/2009 7:49:10 AM PST by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kittykat77

I know you are being sarcastic.....right? LOL!


24 posted on 11/08/2009 7:50:17 AM PST by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Marty62
Why are you assuming anyone would have “standing”?

We don't have standing to ask Obama to prove he is a natural born citizen as required by our Constitution.

25 posted on 11/08/2009 7:51:12 AM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

I did not hear this because I just got up. I’d call it age discrimination! This is the most horrible bill ever pushed upon the American citizens. Health care for all mean for all who are healthy and young only. Grrrr!


26 posted on 11/08/2009 8:02:12 AM PST by tob2 (I would rather have a nuclear power plant in my backyard than Gitmo detainees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

I want to know who is stupid enough - or desperate enough - to take the job. It’s not like there would be any long-term potential.


27 posted on 11/08/2009 8:04:58 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

She even resists her body taking a healty natural aging path, being obsessed with stretching her face, let alone letting the darned thing die! Wait until she realizes that she is mortal like everybody else and not some ‘goddess’. A repulsive woman.


28 posted on 11/08/2009 8:06:34 AM PST by Anima Mundi (The trouble with trouble is it starts out as Utopia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: timetostand

Whew! I was born in 1944.


29 posted on 11/08/2009 8:07:25 AM PST by FroggyTheGremlim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

They will have expiration dates on the elderly - like food products good until dates


30 posted on 11/08/2009 8:14:35 AM PST by Citizen Soldier ("You care far too much what is written and said about you." Axelrod to Obama 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
The rules don't apply to liberals anyway.

Well...perhaps the rules could apply, but to libs, rules they don't like or choose to follow are just reasons to lie, obfuscate, spin, or ignore.

"No libs have ever run into a rule they couldn't ignore - unfortunately - with impunity."

In the 2008 election, we conservatives got exactly what we deserve. We're seeing the results of this right now.

If this happens again in 2010 and 2012, I'd suggest that conservatives no longer are relevant politically.

31 posted on 11/08/2009 8:16:52 AM PST by Logic n' Reason (If you always do what you always did, you'll always get what you always got.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

My husband is after me to get a hip replacement soon because he’s afraid once Pelousy care comes into effect, I’ll be told no.

I may be in pain, but I don’t believe I need one now. Maybe later, but that “later” looks to be age-restricted!


32 posted on 11/08/2009 8:17:39 AM PST by OpusatFR (Tagline not State Approved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster

I have my another mailer from AARP suggesting I join. Don’t know who sold them my new address, but I will send it back with their postage paid envolope with a nasty note.


33 posted on 11/08/2009 8:17:41 AM PST by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Conservatives never seem to grasp the audacity of liberal/Marxist thinking. With passage of this bill the liberal dream of population control is now within their grasp. With one piece of legislation they will now have the power to eliminate “useless eaters” by denying health services to the old, and the means to enforce abortion on a grand scale.


34 posted on 11/08/2009 8:20:43 AM PST by Bernard Marx ("Civilizations die by suicide, not from murder" Toynbee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

I so agree with you, wintertime. (sigh)


35 posted on 11/08/2009 8:25:35 AM PST by azishot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

Funny that there has been almost no mention of the fact that current and new enrollees in Medicare Part B will be hit with a 15% raise in their out-of-pocket cost while no COLA will be forthcoming to offset what are being called ‘Anticipated increases in cost of care for future years.’

From $96.40/month to $110.50/month unless you are currently having the money already withheld.

New enrollees are automatically charged the higher amounts on their quarterly statements.


36 posted on 11/08/2009 8:28:32 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

Funny that there has been almost no mention of the fact that current and new enrollees in Medicare Part B will be hit with a 15% raise in their out-of-pocket cost while no COLA will be forthcoming to offset what are being called ‘Anticipated increases in cost of care for future years.’

From $96.40/month to $110.50/month unless you are currently having the money already withheld.

http://questions.medicare.gov/cgi-bin/medicare.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=2262

New enrollees are automatically charged the higher amounts on their quarterly statements.


37 posted on 11/08/2009 8:29:05 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
Did anyone else hear this? Wouldn't this be age discrimination?

Yes, I heard about it. Betsy McCaughey had an article about it in yesterday's Wall Street Journal:

"What the Pelosi Health-Care Bill Really Says"
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704795604574519671055918380.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_opinion

"Sec. 1302 (pp. 672-692) moves Medicare from a fee-for-service payment system, in which patients choose which doctors to see and doctors are paid for each service they provide, toward what's called a 'medical home.'

"The medical home is this decade's version of HMO-restrictions on care. A primary-care provider manages access to costly specialists and diagnostic tests for a flat monthly fee. The bill specifies that patients may have to settle for a nurse practitioner rather than a physician as the primary-care provider. Medical homes begin with demonstration projects, but the HHS secretary is authorized to 'disseminate this approach rapidly on a national basis.'

"A December 2008 Congressional Budget Office report noted that 'medical homes' were likely to resemble the unpopular gatekeepers of 20 years ago if cost control was a priority."

38 posted on 11/08/2009 8:42:27 AM PST by BusterBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

well, duh... it’s been in the bill all along, both Dick Morris AND Sarah Palin have shouted it from the rooftops and no one listens.


39 posted on 11/08/2009 8:42:32 AM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

That is not even close to an analogy.
When an individual is denied care based on AGE, DISABILTY, it is unconstitutional. PERIOD.


40 posted on 11/08/2009 8:45:59 AM PST by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson