Skip to comments.
Judge Land Fines Orly Taitz $20K, File Copy of Order with State Bar of CA
United States District Court (Georgia) ^
| 10/13/2009
| Judge Clay Land
Posted on 10/13/2009 7:45:31 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 1,161-1,165 next last
To: STARWISE
221
posted on
10/13/2009 10:09:57 AM PDT
by
mlo
To: tired_old_conservative
Not until the judge displayed the same belligerence towards her.
222
posted on
10/13/2009 10:10:32 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: kukaniloko
Maybe not, but in Virginia the new standard is a true copy of a short form BC with the raised seal(No Photocopies). Good luck getting a driver’s license or passport without one. They have really locked things down here after 9/11.
223
posted on
10/13/2009 10:12:00 AM PDT
by
ClayinVA
("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
LOL! You wouldn’t have guessed anyway. I’m Garry Moore!
224
posted on
10/13/2009 10:13:03 AM PDT
by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: pissant
Sounds like she is telling the old boy to shove it to me... Yes, well we'll see where that gets her.
To: SvenMagnussen
That could be a problem for her, if she doesn’t pay that fine, she is going to get 30 days in jail for Contempt.
226
posted on
10/13/2009 10:14:22 AM PDT
by
ClayinVA
("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
To: Canedawg
He was also quite displeased at her specuation that that he had a financial interest in the outcome because he owned stock in Comcast and Microsoft, and she claimed the profits of those companies would suffer if Obama was removed.
_________________
LOL! Does he own them? She’s probably right, but saying it to a judge, oh no! No!
227
posted on
10/13/2009 10:14:25 AM PDT
by
mojitojoe
(Socialism is just the last “feel good” step on the path to Communism and its slavery. Lenin)
To: mlo
I asked because you wrote it was too late for vetting.
228
posted on
10/13/2009 10:15:57 AM PDT
by
Freedom2specul8
(I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
To: mlo
Why wouldn’t you want to disclose .. either way?
229
posted on
10/13/2009 10:17:03 AM PDT
by
STARWISE
(The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
To: mlo
There hasn't been any proof offered that a constitutional violation has occured. That's why we are working on this. We already know he was not vetted. We are after the proof, one way or another.
The constitution doesn't require production of a birth certificate.
Did they even have "birth certificates" back in the time of our founding? Mostly not. But today we do, so let's see it.
The constitutional provisions regarding election of a president have been followed.
Except for the part of requiring NBC status, it went off without a hitch (other than ACORN fraud)
230
posted on
10/13/2009 10:17:14 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
"I asked because you wrote it was too late for vetting." Right. So how could "the vetting process shows him or her ineligible?"
231
posted on
10/13/2009 10:17:36 AM PDT
by
mlo
To: Non-Sequitur
Whatever the fine, it’s obviously worth it to her.
232
posted on
10/13/2009 10:17:43 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; April Lexington; ...
233
posted on
10/13/2009 10:18:31 AM PDT
by
STARWISE
(The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
To: Sibre Fan
'While I can find many appeals of Rule 11 decisions through a Google search (including Phil Berg's appeal in 3rd District, which the Appellate Court ruled on earlier this year), I haven't yet found a case specifically addressing when Rule 11 Sanctions may be appealed. However, the very fact that there are so many - decided after Cunningham was issued, leads me to believe that an appeal is permissible in this situation. " Yep, you're right.
234
posted on
10/13/2009 10:18:53 AM PDT
by
OldDeckHand
(No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
To: freedomwarrior998
So be it. Once Obama’s records are finally pried open, she will be a hero. Her book contract will pay more than her pro-bono work on these lawsuits.
235
posted on
10/13/2009 10:19:13 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: Buckhead; BuckeyeTexan
Ooohhhh....
How long until someone calls Buckhead a troll?
Taking bets.
To: mojitojoe
NS uses the Constitution like toilet paper. That would be you. Your contempt for the Constitution is as complete as your ignorance of it is.
To: r9etb
That, is a lie. It’s a LIE. You can say you don’t believe Holder was there, the rest is a LIE. He had from 5 PM PST to 3PM PST the following day.
238
posted on
10/13/2009 10:19:28 AM PDT
by
mojitojoe
(Socialism is just the last “feel good” step on the path to Communism and its slavery. Lenin)
To: little jeremiah
They do. DU. We know that don’t we? We found some of them.
239
posted on
10/13/2009 10:20:25 AM PDT
by
mojitojoe
(Socialism is just the last “feel good” step on the path to Communism and its slavery. Lenin)
To: LorenC
I don't need to; I'm personally satisfied with the evidence I have.
LOL!! And you claim to be a lawyer? Now I'm understanding better why lawyer jokes are so popular.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 1,161-1,165 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson