Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breast-feeding mother sues airlines
SF Gate ^ | October 8, 2009 | Amy Graff

Posted on 10/09/2009 6:46:08 AM PDT by Huck

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-205 last
To: b9

I guess I’m on the side of fixing the culture. Not the way some of the radical breast-feeding crowd do it, but I think asserting your rights by feeding in public is the way to go.


201 posted on 10/09/2009 5:55:20 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
ROFLOL, talk about spouting off, man grab a drum, I cannot not believe all of the garbage you have put out. You seem to be consumed with some sort of fetish. Get some professional help.
202 posted on 10/09/2009 7:34:41 PM PDT by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Some people think it’s just fun spouting off about how gross or disgusting or warped it is for a woman to want to breast-feed a 22-month-old woman.

But in the REAL WORLD, women have to put up with the real-life issue of breastfeeding their children, in a culture where a lot of people feel like it’s their right to spout off about them breast-feeding their children inappropriately.

I’ve posted a link, and quotes from multiple scientific organizations all of whom say that scientifically, it is good for a woman to be breast-feeding a 22-month old child.

It’s unfortunate that I have to do that, but too many smart people here at FR remain ignorant, and willfully so, about this, but speak as if they know what they are talking about.

Hopefully, women reading this thread will get the right information, and won’t be turned off to breastfeeding because of the attacks made by people here. I’m sure you just meant it in fun, but breastfeeding women are being discouraged by ignorant rants about how they are wrong to breastfeed their older infants.

I hope that when you step back, you can look at the scientific literature I have linked, and realise your error.

Or you can try to mislead women by ranting about how you can attack one source because they don’t oppose homosexual couples. This isn’t a political argument, it’s a scientific one.


203 posted on 10/09/2009 7:54:04 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Fetish, fetish, fetish. I did not rant about anything.


204 posted on 10/09/2009 7:57:51 PM PDT by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT; Protect the Bill of Rights

I think post #195 sums it up best, from a woman who’s been there, done that.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2358318/posts?page=195#195

She obviously loved her little ones by breast-feeding them, while respecting the rights of others to not have to watch.

It’s the loving thing to do.


205 posted on 10/10/2009 12:28:28 AM PDT by b9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-205 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson