Posted on 10/07/2009 11:23:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
Dear Messers DeJute & West:
Dr. Taitz has asked me to ask you whether you are willing to stipulate that, now that the Scheduling Order has been made final, rather than moot, that it is now time for us to begin discovery. We need to start sending out notices of deposition duces tecum to parties and subpoenas duces tecum to non-parties. The Judge specifically said that the Scheduling order would only be important if the case were going to go forward, and he seems to have spoken on this point.
Charles E. Lincoln, Research Associate & Law Clerk for Dr. Taitz, Esq., Attorney for the Plaintiffs.
I'd like to see some of the Marines that have had to salute the fraudulent POS.along for the honor.
I don’t see an ordered or entered date of today,
Oct 7. Appears to be from the hearing on the 5th.
Is this correct?
You signed up in July and this is your ownly post.
I am wondering the same thing. I know it is frustrating; but I wish they would quit jumping the gun and post with actual proof.
“The Judge specifically said that the Scheduling order would only be important if the case were going to go forward, and he seems to have spoken on this point.”
Did Judge Carter say this? I am not second guessing but maybe we missed that.
LOL! Orly’s already rattling the DOJ attorneys cages.
Thanks for the update, LucyT.
Great News Ping.
Orly stung herself and everyone on the case once. Keyes is no fool and would not just repeat Orly. There are other lawyers involved as well... We’ll see if she steps in it again, but I doubt it.
Where is the long form, passport, school and college records? Where?
And West's reply was one word: "Nuts!"
See historic reference here.
I agree with your ascertion that discovery may not produce a smoking gun. What if there is no birth certificate at all because it's been destroyed? The plaintiff cannot prove he was foreign born and 0bama doesn't have to prove that he is an NBC. That would suck bigtime.
why make a tentative date firm if you intend to dismiss? Tentative can remain tentative as long as need be because its just that... tentative. No reason to make it firm at this point unless the ruling is not to dismiss.
Oh I agree that it is irrelevant. But you mentioned that if scotus were to decide against congress’ act that it would render Obama as never having been potus.
I just don’t see scotus deciding against congress. I see scotus declaring Obama as not qualified and leaving it to congress to decide the way forward, even though I would wish it were scotus to decide.
Because the US has no experience in such a scenario, I see political parties petitioning scotus to review the constitutionality of what the hell congress thinks should happen. I see lots of fighting until eventually it is decided to hold a special election. And then my wishful thinking has Palin winning.
As for failing the test, I don’t agree that the test was failed. Obama was presented as certified to hold office. IOW congress was duped and they carried out their duties constitutionally. I don’t see scotus reversing their vote but deciding only that Obama is not constitutionally qualified to hold the office, ergo he is deposed. What happens then is a fight for ascendancy. I see Biden excluded but fighting for it. I see Pelosi ascending but not without challenge.
Charles E. Lincoln is an ex-lawyer who has been disbarred in three states. Interesting that he is Orly's "Research Associate and Law Clerk."
So you are comparing a scummy DOJ attorney protecting an usurper to Col. Anthony McAuliffe of the 101st Airborne at Bastonge?
Nice. Creep.
The same order says that the motion to dismiss is "under submission," meaning that the judge hasn't decided it yet. So reading anything into the scheduling order is premature.
Where was he born and does his father's citizenship preclude him from being a natural born US citizen. Don't hear much of the second issue in these court cases.
I would like to see his passport and school records to see what can be ascertained about his life. We have an expectation to know this about our top elected officials.
Would it require impeachment hearings by the house and senate?’
You cannot impeach someone who was not eligible in the first place.
He is removed. Period. Biden, also.
Runners-up are new President and VP.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.