Glenn Beck's New Target: Mark Lloyd

The Daily Voice ^ | 9/9/09 | Keith Boykin

[DarthVader]

Good this version of Martin Bormann must bite the dust.

[reaganbooster]

“despite the fact that the president has already disappointed the far left of his own party with a moderate record in governing.”

Boy, if that doesn’t scare you. The left thinks he is too moderate. This coming after taking federal control of everything he could. It shows us all where they are coming from, politically.

[freespirited]

Notice how the author carefully avoids saying anything about what he KNOWS is the damning evidence against Lloyd:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wF2C235fD7o

Lloyd hails state controlled media a la Chavez.

[GBA]

When the question is: “Whose honesty, judgment, facts and opinions do I trust more, obama’s or Beck's?” My answer is Glenn Beck's.

If obama (and the state run media) likes these czars but Beck and his audience doesn't, the odds are very high that the czars are very bad for the Republic.

[pgkdan]

Cass Sunstein should be next. He’s the most dangerous of the lot and he does have to be confirmed by the Senate. In fact a vote is scheduled to be snuck in today when nobody is paying any attention.

[Sherman Logan]

Never mind that these officials don't actually run the government and not one of them carries the actual title "czar." That's a media fabrication cooked up by people like Beck.

Actually, calling these various special assistants to the president was not invented by Beck, it goes back at least a decade. Whether a particular individual qualifies for the designation is of course debatable.

[sand lake bar]

Note the attempt to put Lloyd “in the mainstream” while avoiding any mention of his positions on actual issues.

[truthguy]

Just keep shinning a light on these cockroaches.

[Wee-Weed Up]

The label “Czar” is not a media fabrication. I seem to recall Robert Gibbs calling them that as well.

[Old Professer]

One of the oldest and surest of military tactics is to ‘divide and conquer;’ why then shouldn’t cautious people fret about the sudden enshrinement of a movement to ensure the accomodation of exotic cultures among humans any less than the naturalists equally fight against the contamination of the habitats through exotic plants on lower-order species?

If the flora achieve the rights of protection currently afforded the hominoids (another movement of the new age)who steward the planet what then will be the counsel?

[Reagan Man]

>>>>>"...Glenn Beck supporters are calling for the public lynching of FCC Diversity Czar Mark Lloyd"

Yes indeed, a little racism thrown in for good measure. Despicable!

[wardaddy]

not sure I wouldn’t have picked that Blum fella

[wardaddy]

What could imagine a more inflammatory phrase in connection with an African American

who knows, why don't you ask one DmanA?

[wardaddy]

amazing the fruits of the minority rising in this nation..whatever minority

they are so humble and tolerant with their achievements

i recall when i was a boy and we were assured that when more blacks entered the professional classes they would become more conservative...which back then (like now sorta actually) meant more “white”..as in like us...better behaved as a group, more intact families, more socially conservative

that worked out great.

now they and most every other minority has been loaded up in all our instittions as recompense and they are not in a get along mood after all

the road to hell...

[Dem Guard]

It looks like the time is long over due when conservative editorialist and reporters go after the lib’s shills in the media and investigate them personally. They have long
held themselves to be above repute but the time has come to really show them for what they really are.

[ridesthemiles]

Beck is right on- again !!

One by one, these ‘czars’ have to be taken down once and for all.

[ridesthemiles]

One by one, these ‘czars’ have to be taken down once and for all.”

Since these ‘czars’ are only accountable to NObama- I say that this is all a SILENT COUP by Barry Soetero and gang.

[andy58-in-nh]

Here's the problem: what Progressives innocently call "diversity, regulation and environmental protection", we call censorship, tyranny, and theft.

There is simply no way to reconcile those viewpoints. Liberals have spent over 100 years laboring to change the meaning of words so that subjective intentions matter more than objective reality.

In their world, if you own a radio station and a government agency issues a rule mandating your station broadcast viewpoints whose content you despise, you must comply or lose your broadcast license. Liberals see no problem with this, because they believe your rights come from the government, not from God or nature. The government represents the "people" - and the people have an interest in "diversity" that supersedes your ownership rights.

Now if you object, it is not because you are demanding your rights - according to liberals, you haven't any rights the government doesn't allow you to have - so it must be because you hate or fear "diversity".

It is not difficult to conclude that two such incompatible views of the proper role of government in society cannot coexist in peace for long.

[MNDude]

looks like there’s a conocopia of articles about the guy if you go to news.google.com and you can set the date to any time period you wish.

Here’s an example of one I found:

by inspiring fear for political gains, (Bush) is fanning the fire of racism, one that will continue to burn long after his presidency.

http://news.pacificnews.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=41ce849c7bb9a18a3a93230d41c2c3ca

[bigbob]

“Beck’s Rules for Patriots”