Skip to comments.
Shocker! Judge orders trial on eligibility issue
WND ^
| 9/8/09
| staff
Posted on 09/08/2009 2:15:45 PM PDT by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640, 641-660, 661-680 ... 861-871 next last
To: Non-Sequitur; Uncle Chip; mkjessup; campaignPete R-CT; SeaHawkFan; Red Steel; MHGinTN; pissant; ...
And the great thing is even if Orly can't move forward with this judge, the primer has been cracked as to how to move beyond any “lack of standing” issues that have plagued prior eligibility cases. How so? My intellectually-dishonest FRiend — I shall not be divulging that to an obvious obfuscator as yourself. But as I've said elsewhere, the answer lies within “KEITH LANCE ET AL. v. MIKE COFFMAN”, “FRED HOLLANDER v. JOHN MCCAIN” and others. Kudos to Orly, who seems to be listening. Kreep and others will keep things on track. |
641
posted on
09/09/2009 10:04:21 AM PDT
by
BP2
(I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
To: BP2
My intellectually-dishonest FRiend I shall not be divulging that to an obvious obfuscator as yourself. You don't know either, huh?
But as I've said elsewhere, the answer lies within KEITH LANCE ET AL. v. MIKE COFFMAN, FRED HOLLANDER v. JOHN MCCAIN and others.
And what makes you think that the judge won't find that Orly's plaintiffs lack standing as well?
To: SeattleBruce
The fact that Carter was appointed by Clinton, means that he passed at least a modicum of liberal tests. He may also have some loyalty to the Clintons. Would you not agree?No, I do not agree to speculation. It is your opinion, not mine.
Look, here is where I stand on this issue. Judge Carter is bending over backwards guiding Orly Taitz through procedural issues with her filings. See post # 632. He is telegraphing to all who can hear, read and understand that he wants to see this "question" dealt with.
I wish Orly well with her case but she needs serious help in understanding proper filings and local rules of the court.
I see no "red flags" with Judge Carter's handling of this case to date. On the contrary, he wants to see this issue resolved as well.
Cheers
To: Non-Sequitur
You don't know either, huh?
644
posted on
09/09/2009 10:16:18 AM PDT
by
BP2
(I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
To: hinckley buzzard
But the only step we are really concerned about is discovery. Just get the information out in the open. I am mostly interested in the school records at the moment. Was he enrolled as a foreign student?
645
posted on
09/09/2009 10:16:27 AM PDT
by
rbbeachkid
(The ONLY ones able to fix the economy - Small Business Owners!)
To: Non-Sequitur; faucetman
You sir are a potted plant.
Whatever.
Fixed your original statement in the interest of accuracy Faucetman, lol
646
posted on
09/09/2009 10:23:01 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Jefferson was right about needing to periodically water the Tree of Liberty.)
To: BP2
But yet you can’t explain your ‘cracked the lack of standing’ comment. I’d be interested in knowing how you stumbled into that conclusion when the judge hasn’t even ruled on the defense’s motion to dismiss on, among other grounds, lack of standing. Can you explain that part at least?
To: dcwusmc
Look, if you read further than just the post you reference, you'll find that, thanks to FReeper afnamvet, I demurred on my statement. I did not know that the judge is a Marine. Should I have done my homework? Yes. But I'll restate what I said in another post. I have watched this Republic demeaned, and its institutions (including, very pointedly, the judiciary) corrupted beyond recognition. My cynicism is such that I believe, unless shown otherwise, anything or anyONE even slightly connected to BJ Klintoon is tainted. My immediate reaction when I see the Kenyan Pretender getting away with wholesale treason is "why's this time gonna be any different." I sincerely hope and pray this judge is the man you say he is. I guess we'll find out in January.
(And yes, I know it's hard for you to believe that cretins and scum-of-the-earth such as me pray and believe in the principles that this Republic is founded upon. Sorry to spoil your stereotype.)
648
posted on
09/09/2009 10:32:57 AM PDT
by
LaybackLenny
(Sarah Palin can see the left's heads explode from her house!)
To: mkjessup
Fixed your original statement in the interest of accuracy Faucetman, lol Whatever your intersts are I've noticed that accuracy isn't one of them.
To: STARWISE
The Obama team contented itself with a motion to dismiss the case and a protective order, but there has yet to be a ruling on this, perhaps to the surprise and chagrin of Obama and the DNC.
Obamas lawyers in these motions, argued that revealing the information (birth certificate, citizenship in other countries, etc.) would
cause a defined and serious injury to Obama and/or the DNC.
They say revealing these documents raises a legitimate privacy concern and the above mentioned risk that
particularly serious embarrassment will result from turning over the requested documentation.
Weird. Neither of the quoted phrases appear anywhere in the Motion to Dismiss or Motion for Protective Order filed by Obama/DNC in the Berg v. Obama case, both of which are available at
Justia.com. I wonder what pleading they are talking about.
To: Non-Sequitur
Fixed your original statement in the interest of accuracy Faucetman, lol
Whatever your intersts are I've noticed that accuracy isn't one of them.
Oh I don't know about that, I've been hitting the bullseye on your lying ass with pretty good accuracy.
And I know how to spell too.
651
posted on
09/09/2009 10:44:25 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(You're either with the Constitution, or you're with the Liars, Enablers & that EmEFin 0bama! CHOOSE!)
To: Sibre Fan; All
Obamas lawyers in these motions, argued that revealing the information (birth certificate, citizenship in other countries, etc.) would cause a defined and serious injury to Obama and/or the DNC.
They say revealing these documents raises a legitimate privacy concern and the above mentioned risk that particularly serious embarrassment will result from turning over the requested documentation.
And to that, I say to those lawyers and to the Dear Comrade:
TOO EFFIN BAD!
Release the records, ALL of 'em!
652
posted on
09/09/2009 10:49:34 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(You're either with the Constitution, or you're with the Liars, Enablers & that EmEFin 0bama! CHOOSE!)
To: Non-Sequitur
I believe that with this post two days ago you have met your quota of certifiable prefabrications on this forum. You should take the rest of the week off. Nope. Having too much fun. Having too much fun prefabricating to take the rest of the week off, ehh??? By all means then, please continue with your prefabrications.
653
posted on
09/09/2009 10:49:46 AM PDT
by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: Uncle Chip
Lies, distortions and half-truths are that troll’s stock-in-trade.
654
posted on
09/09/2009 10:51:18 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(You're either with the Constitution, or you're with the Liars, Enablers & that EmEFin 0bama! CHOOSE!)
To: mkjessup
Lies, distortions and half-truths are that trolls stock-in-trade.Yup!!!
655
posted on
09/09/2009 10:58:05 AM PDT
by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: Sibre Fan
If Taitz demanded a jury trial, it demonstrates she is clueless about procedures. She does see the big picture and she and Kreep would make a great team if she would recognize he is strong where she is weak.
To: Non-Sequitur; All
But yet you cant explain your cracked the lack of standing comment. Id be interested in knowing how you stumbled into that conclusion when the judge hasnt even ruled on the defenses motion to dismiss on, among other grounds, lack of standing. Can you explain that part at least? ![Photobucket](http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj183/laughtech/nope2.jpg) It's not that I can't — it's that I won't
|
657
posted on
09/09/2009 11:00:57 AM PDT
by
BP2
(I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
To: pissant
THe 9th Circus Court will nip this in the bud.
658
posted on
09/09/2009 11:01:07 AM PDT
by
hattend
(Sarah Palin's mob minion - Mob Name: Hatman the Hitman)
To: SaraJohnson
Davis was a total perv! Group sex, kiddie sex, and other things I won’t mention, total pervert Communist.
659
posted on
09/09/2009 11:01:45 AM PDT
by
mojitojoe
(Socialism is just the last “feel good” step on the path to Communism and its slavery. Lenin)
To: woofie
What are other legal pros saying?He set a date for a trial if he denies the motion to dismiss. So far, no eligibility case has survived such a motion.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640, 641-660, 661-680 ... 861-871 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson