Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jay Ambrose: Murdoch outfoxes lefty competition (Fox News)
The Boston Herald ^ | September 6, 2009 | Jay Ambrose

Posted on 09/05/2009 10:23:13 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Sprite518
I'm not sure but I think you described the reaction Alinsky's Rules try to provoke so the "other side" will expose their true being.

Keep it up, Glenn!

21 posted on 09/06/2009 3:18:06 AM PDT by rvoitier ("The law allows what honor forbids." -- C. C. Colton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brugmansian
LoL

You had me hook, line and sinker until the end. Well played, sir.

22 posted on 09/06/2009 3:19:15 AM PDT by rvoitier ("The law allows what honor forbids." -- C. C. Colton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: psjones

She recently got engaged on the Mall in D.C. So I would imagine she’s busy doing all those girly pre-marriage things right now.


23 posted on 09/06/2009 3:23:45 AM PDT by rvoitier ("The law allows what honor forbids." -- C. C. Colton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

:-)

Like another era, aren’t those days? I was calling my cable company to get FOX with no result. Had dial-up and 32 megs of RAM with which I could get FOX on line but the video stalled every few seconds. Then FOX pulled its video feed and nothing for months. Not a cable company in the country now that doesn’t carry it, is there?


24 posted on 09/06/2009 3:27:36 AM PDT by Brugmansian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518
You know the far left are going to throw everything at Beck including the Kitchen Sink.

As long as it isn't one that Clinton fouled.

25 posted on 09/06/2009 3:39:17 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
Hannity was more watchable with a liberal to bounce off of.

Any chance he'll get another liberal amigo to hang with him, or will they all get hissed to death for helping Hannity argue more effectively about these issues?

I remember how liberals used to complain about Colmes -- that he was too nice, etc. (they wanted him to snarl and sneer like Rosie O'Donnell, I suppose).

26 posted on 09/06/2009 3:46:02 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
[Article] Of course, liberals don’t use the word “liberal” anymore. They are trying to escape their ignominy in the eyes of many by calling themselves “progressives.” By any other name, however, their political attitudes remain the same.

Actually, there's a pretty good essay to be written about why this statement is wrong. I don't have time for it, though.

Basically, "liberals" like Hubert Humphrey and Adlai Stevenson and Walter Mondale are nearly extinct, displaced by "progressives" whose line goes back to the Red CPUSA members and Stalinist-front activist traitors of the 30's who eventually seized control of the Democratic Party in 1972 and, with few interruptions, have run it ever since.

Think of a Democrat who did *not* have flaming-radical connections after 1972, and I'll show you a Democrat who fell by the wayside in the primary process. Almost *all* the more-successful Dem candidates in the primaries have been "progressives".

Bill Clinton and the Democratic Leadership Council? Clinton may have been a Chinese PLA asset since his 20's. He covered up for Wen Ho Lee (using Bill Richardson as his man on point) and demonized the honest spyhunter Notra Trulock. This he did, and much, much else. Clinton, the old SDS New Leftist, a "moderate"? Don't make me laugh.

Having eclipsed the real "liberals" now these last 20 years, though, "progressives" are beginning to dust off the name "liberal" and, in another of their patented Huge Lies, apply it to themselves. They are Stalinists, not liberals. Which is why they want the liberal label, for cover.

27 posted on 09/06/2009 3:54:40 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
LOL "Juan Williams" is a "thoughtful liberal". Brit used to have to "educate" him regularly about the simplest things. It was embarassing. I have to credit Juan for sticking with it and at times he does seem to actually care about America but "thoughtful" would require a new definition to extend it to Juan.

Μολὼν λάβε


28 posted on 09/06/2009 6:07:31 AM PDT by wastoute (translation of tag "Come and get them (bastards)" or "come get some")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

Liberals will take any chance they can to go against Hannity...Fox figured nobody paid attention to what Colmes was saying anyway so they tested to see what Hannity does on his own.

I predict he winds up with a co-host sometime in a year or so to shake things up. His panel is a good idea after you sit through Beck and O’Reilly his show becomes a recap. O’Reilly is the one that should be moved to 9 PM and Beck to 8 with Hannity at 10 and Greta at 5.


29 posted on 09/06/2009 7:13:18 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache (An oath to a liar is no oath at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

Time for a full court press! I’ve said all along that Obama is a leftist, racist COWARD, and today it was proven!


30 posted on 09/06/2009 7:31:46 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hey Jay, get a grip. Obama’s reaction to the Commie Harvard professor’s outrageous behavior was RACIST — pure and simple. If you can’t see that you have your eyes closed.


31 posted on 09/06/2009 7:41:47 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"They are trying to escape their ignominy in the eyes of many by calling themselves “progressives.”

The problem with that is that there is nothing "progressive" about the policies they advocate. The fact is their ideology is old, outdated, and has been tried and failed everywhere--even in America!

The following essay, reprinted with permission, illustrates that point.

The Miracle of America

from

axes and hoes to high technology;

log cabins to air-conditioned condos;

horsedrawn wagons to autos, planes, and rockets;

scarcity to abundance; &

from tyrannical government rule to individual liberty

HOW DID IT ALL BEGIN?

Most of our history books don’t tell us that, in the beginning, the pilgrims established a communal economic system. Each was to produce according to his ability and contribute his production to a common storehouse from which each was to draw according to his need.

The assurance that they would be fed from the common store, regardless of their contribution to it, had a peculiarly disabling effect on the colonists. Taking property away from some and giving it to others bred discontent and retarded employment. Human nature was the same then as now, and before long, there were more consumers than there were producers, and the pilgrims were near starvation. Governor Bradford, his advisors, and the colonists agreed that in order to increase their crops, each family would be allowed to do as it pleased with whatever it produced. In other words, a free market system was established. In Governor Bradford’s own words:

“This had very good success; for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corne was planted than other waise would have bene by any means ye Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deall of trouble, and gave farr better contente. The women now wente willingly into ye field, and tooke their little-ons with them to set corne, which before would aledg weaknes, and inabilitie; whom to have compelled would have bene though great tiranie and oppression. . . . By this time harvest was come, and instead of famine, now God gave them plenty, and the face of things was changed. . . . and some of ye abler sort and more industrious had to spare, and sell to others, so as any generall wante or famine hath not been amongst them since this day . . . .” (Wm. Bradford, “Of Plimoth Plantation,” original manuscript, Wright & Potter, Boston, 1901)


Those who, today, favor central government planning, common ownership and redistribution of the earnings of others are advocating a system that Americans tried and rejected over 350 years ago. Their wisdom gave birth to the great American miracle!

Are we as wise today?

You Can Do Something About This!

(This message originally published in the mid-1980’s by Stedman Corporation’s Government Affairs & Free Enterprise Education Program – a former NC textile firm. For more essays in this series, visit www.ouragelessconstitution.com )


32 posted on 09/06/2009 7:58:23 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goldie Lurks

Yes, Hannity has done lots of great work. When he or Glenn or any of the other good Fox folk have “progressives” on as “foils” to provide “balance,” these useless guests often waste perfectly good Fox broadcast time. *They* are the people I only want to hear *about*, not *from*. As another sad fact, Kirsten Powers, Juan Williams, and others too often do the same filibustering as the admitted progressives.


33 posted on 09/06/2009 9:45:43 AM PDT by JohnQ1 ("Some cause happiness wherever they go; others, whenever." Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson