Skip to comments.
Global Warming Could Forestall Ice Age
New York Times ^
| September 4, 2009
| Andrew C. Revkin
Posted on 09/04/2009 1:18:56 PM PDT by reaganaut1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Even if one believes in AGW, isn't averting another ice age that buries "much of the Northern Hemisphere under a mile or more of ice" a good thing?
To: steelyourfaith; xcamel
To: reaganaut1; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
No shirt, shylock.
3
posted on
09/04/2009 1:19:51 PM PDT
by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: reaganaut1
4
posted on
09/04/2009 1:20:12 PM PDT
by
Mojave
(Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
To: reaganaut1
but could also even fend off what had been presumed to be an inevitable descent into a new ice age over the next few dozen millenniums I think the NYT notes the cooler environment and fewer Many Hurricanes. They may switch back to global cooling in a year or two.
5
posted on
09/04/2009 1:22:57 PM PDT
by
sr4402
To: reaganaut1
"Even if one believes in AGW, isn't averting another ice age that buries "much of the Northern Hemisphere under a mile or more of ice" a good thing? " Are you kidding me? What better way than to destroy America with a mile of ice over it's people, businesses and military. This is exactly what the environmental wackos dream about at night.
6
posted on
09/04/2009 1:25:25 PM PDT
by
OldDeckHand
(No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
To: reaganaut1
Not if you hate human beings.
7
posted on
09/04/2009 1:25:25 PM PDT
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
To: reaganaut1
Not necessarily. Long Island is a glacial moraine, meaning Manhattan would be under the ice. We wouldn’t have to put up with any more drivel from the New York Times!
8
posted on
09/04/2009 1:25:26 PM PDT
by
colorado tanker
(Martha's Vineyard is great! Hey, honey, let's take a drive . . . .)
To: sr4402
9
posted on
09/04/2009 1:25:47 PM PDT
by
marlon
(Does anyone know the procedure for impeachment of a teleprompter?)
To: colorado tanker
Yeah, but then they’d all just move to TX and FL.
10
posted on
09/04/2009 1:26:10 PM PDT
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
To: reaganaut1
I have been arguing this point with global warming alarmists for years.
11
posted on
09/04/2009 1:26:48 PM PDT
by
HD1200
To: SunkenCiv
Ping.
This article claims 2000 years of sustained cooling in the Arctic until recently. My b.s. detector is going off - this sounds like the hockey stick redux.
12
posted on
09/04/2009 1:26:58 PM PDT
by
colorado tanker
(Martha's Vineyard is great! Hey, honey, let's take a drive . . . .)
To: reaganaut1
Gentlemen, start your engines.
13
posted on
09/04/2009 1:27:18 PM PDT
by
Gator113
(It's about stupidity, stupid. IMPEACH HERE, IMPEACH NOW.)
To: reaganaut1
An ice age is what is to be feared. Billions would starve to death. Global warming is a great boon to life on Earth.
14
posted on
09/04/2009 1:29:15 PM PDT
by
TheDon
To: reaganaut1
The last ice age buried much of the Northern Hemisphere under a mile or more of ice. I await breathlessly the glaciers leveling of Manhattan.
15
posted on
09/04/2009 1:30:00 PM PDT
by
Islander7
(If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
To: brytlea
I don't know about that. A bunch of disarmed Manhattanites trying to take land from a bunch of rednecks who like their guns and religion??? :-))
16
posted on
09/04/2009 1:36:01 PM PDT
by
colorado tanker
(Martha's Vineyard is great! Hey, honey, let's take a drive . . . .)
To: reaganaut1
an inevitable descent into a new ice age over the next few dozen millenniums.For millions of years, we've had Ice Ages alternating with interglacial periods.
The Ice Ages average, roughly speaking, 100k years in length.
The interglacials, again very roughly, average 10k to 15k in length.
We're about 12k into the present interglacial.
Yet these guys talk about the next ice age starting up in a few dozen millenia? Where do they get that?
17
posted on
09/04/2009 1:39:19 PM PDT
by
Sherman Logan
("The price of freedom is the toleration of imperfections." Thomas Sowell)
To: OldDeckHand
What better way than to destroy America with a mile of ice over it's people, businesses and military. This is exactly what the environmental wackos dream about at night. It would be kinda tough on Russia and China, too.
To: Pearls Before Swine
"It would be kinda tough on Russia and China, too. Strangely enough, Russia and China - almost all of the Asian continent - were fairly untouched by the last glacial period. Europe, as a whole didn't fair to badly either, although what's now the Scandinavian countries and UK were complete covered in Ice, along with most of Germany, Switzerland, Netherlands and northern France.
In other words, all the "white" countries, for the most part got hammered in the last ice age, while the Asian, Pan Asian and Mongol areas remained largely unaffected - FWIW.
19
posted on
09/04/2009 1:54:43 PM PDT
by
OldDeckHand
(No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
To: reaganaut1; Normandy; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; TenthAmendmentChampion; Horusra; Delacon; ...
20
posted on
09/04/2009 2:27:13 PM PDT
by
steelyourfaith
("Power is not alluring to pure minds." - Thomas Jefferson)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson