Posted on 08/30/2009 6:12:00 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
Such a typical tactic. Evolutionists have been ignoring the multiple fallacies that underlay evolution for years. Personal credulity, equivocation, the fallacy of affirming the consequent, the appeal to the fallacy of negative proof, the ‘a priori’ assumption of naturalism, begging the question or any number of other fallacious lines of thought.
The fallacy of personal credulity for believing that ‘nature did it’ is inherent in ‘scientific’ papers every day, but where is your indignation at that fallacy supposedly supporting a ‘scientific’ conclusion?
Of course, you don’t mind invoking the fallacy of cherry-picking yourself when you think it makes a good argument. Too bad you don’t have the critical-thinking skills to recognize your own logical errors.
You haven’t said anything remotely coherent since we started and that incoherent, rambling response isn’t any different. At no point were you close to anything not based on fallacy that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this forum is now dumber for having read your posts.
I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul.
What’s all that nonsense have to do with THIS ARTICLE?
Nothing?
Rant on....
When he cannot answer the question this is the best he can do.
The sad thing is that he fails to see how foolish that makes himself and in turn all other id/creationists/ cdesign proponentsists appear.
What’s that nonsense got to do with EVOLUTION!
Nothing?
Rant on...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.