![](http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/7849/sunyatsen.jpg";)
(http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/7849/sunyatsen.jpg")
Posted on 08/16/2009 4:45:55 PM PDT by Vincent Jappi
This is not a ‘citizen until proven otherwise’ situaton. Until we get proof to the contrary, 0bama falls into the same category as 95% of the world... And not be a US citizen, let alone NBC
today, to get on an airplane... I had to submit proper ID twice AND submit to a partial strip search (shoes and jacket off). The LEAST 0bama can do is provide the basic information required in the Constitution
Wasn’t Kim born on US soil to foreign parents???? BO, OTOH, for sure has an American mommy.
parsy, who thinks BO is a legal liberal
Not a bro..read my profile :)
You might be a third grader if you use the term “birther”.
The facts of this case, as agreed by the parties, are as follows: Wong Kim Ark was born in 1873, in the city of San Francisco, in the state of California and United States of America, and was and is a laborer. His father and mother were persons of Chinese descent, and subjects of the emperor of China. They were at the time of his birth domiciled residents of the United States, having previously established and are still enjoying a permanent domicile and residence therein at San Francisco.
I find the question of eligibility, under the constitution, to be mixed as between legal and political. I think the crux of the issue, as seen by the founders, was undivided loyalty to the United States.
LBJ: “I will never send American boys to fight in Vietnam.”
VJ, don’t know where you got this, and none of the rest of the tidbits are sourced. Just bla bla for the fun of it? Sure.
Iv been round and round on this til my hair hurts, and its not the dems and rinos that engender consternation. When Lou. sounds on target and Ann sound spot short, its problematic in the minimum.
Any how mixing feel good stuff with plain old BS, as you seem to have done here, really isn’t much of a contribution.
“... if a presidential candidate tries to hand me a barebones certificate of live birth in lieu of a valid, long-form birth certificate, my skeptical antennae go on alert.” Kyle-Ann, honey, this lying POIE didn’t even go that far! He posted a forgery on the Internet and told America to go sc** itself, that was all we were getting from his highness. And his worshippers love it that way, they love his getting away with criminality because they are against the law, too.
She did claim this. Has she recanted?
What we have is not “birthers”, but the “Certifigate”.
Even more absurd is the attitude of the Republicans who are enforcing an Omertà on this, rather than say what she just wrote.
(http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/7849/sunyatsen.jpg")
Even if, as you stated, the Pubbies don’t have the stones to push the issue (you are correct), how do you expect any kind of hearing or whatever to be held?
She didn't recant because she never claimed it in the first place.
That she made such a claim is an Internet myth based on the misunderstanding of something else she said.
In 1870, perhaps.
Yet there was and is clear evidence that Sun Yat-Sen was born in China. The only obtained a Hawaiian BC as an adult (in 1870!!) because he had numerous people conspire to assist him.
90+ years later, the situation was quite different.
And it still stands that there is no credible evidence that BHO was born anywhere but Hawaii.
1904. He got the BC in 1904.
I had 1870 stuck in my head. That was the date on his falsified BC.
Needed to correct that.
But I believe my point still stands.
“birther” spelled backwards spells “rehtrib”. In Hebrew rehtrib means “One who verifies”, it is strongs #1233. /sarcasm ....
My Apologies,
Whew,
God Bless Texas !
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.