Posted on 08/03/2009 12:16:27 AM PDT by FARS
you still think he can be a four year term? Or even eight?
IMHO he will not finish this term after the BC scanadal erupts. Not witout ending in bloodshed if he tries to retain power by force like teh Mullahs are doing.
Exept unlike the sutdents we are armed nad many trained to resist such oppression and suppression of our rights.
As to the Queen etc., they will consider him an annoyance and ostracise him their minds and silently hope Orly is right and has the real thing.
Hopefully, as someone posted, BINGO!
I dearly hope you are right. The United States does not deserve even one term of BHO. What he has done/is doing/will do to your great Nation is nothing short of scandalous.
To think that he will have done so while potentially being ineligible — and knowingly so — is outrageous.
I do hope you are right.
God Bless America
*DieHard*
It occurred earlier today with the exact same link/ URL.
The thread was taken down, because the link contained malware.
It’s very late - or very early morning and my tired mind and fingers are not doing too well with typos and I’m too tired and excited to do spell checks.
Apologize to all and ask for forgiveness
Actually, I believe the issue was with her blog which was a diferent URL.
No worries though. I've the balls to write her and have. And no reformatting of my hard drive was necessary.
Thank you for the heads up and I understood your conern before I knew the reasons and even lauded it.
My link posted from AntiMullah failed to come up as a link but I tried it on there and they did and it was safe.
We must have a couple of Dimwit trolls on board.
cheers,
No way is this thing real. But I sure hope it is. Maybe the Mossad made it up....Israel has no use for the Kenyan
As a side note, now that this issue has hit the mainstream media and we have this strong evidence, we can look forward to a lot fewer posts claiming this is a waste of time, blah blah blah...
Nice. Pen a paper does seem like a good medium with which to communicate. I think I’ll try that. Thanks for the tip.
You see, if “Michael Savage” meant nothing to me — a well-informed Kiwi with close ties to the US — he will have meant even less than nothing to anybody in the United Kingdom.
It may be difficult to imagine, within the United States as you are and receiving nonstop bombardment by these issues, but outside the States we aren’t bombarded 24x7 by your media machine.
If you asked 1,000 people in the streets of Auckland who Katie Couric is, I would bet you a pint of your favorite ale that not one of them would correctly identify her as an overpaid American newsreader. And probably not 1 in 10,000 would correctly identify her employer.
The entire “Birther” issue? I have seen it mentioned once in New Zealand media — it was an article in “The Listener”, one of our better weekly magazines, a short article more of a curiosity than anything else. If you went into the streets of Dunedin — one of our University towns — and asked 1,000 people at random about the “Birther” issue, I’d bet you another pint of your favorite ale that not one of them could outline the key talking-points, if indeed they could even describe the issue itself.
If you went into the streets of Christchurch (another University town) and asked 1,000 people which party Obama represents, fewer than 500 would get it right (most folk wouldn’t know the two American political parties, any more than you would know our two main political parties — National and Labour).
The average New Zealander is at least as well informed as the average Brit — I’d venture that we’re much better informed because we’re much better educated and much better traveled, on average.
So if I didn’t know who Michael Savage is (and frankly couldn’t care less) then why would anybody in the United Kingdom?
This whole issue really only has legs in the US. And even then, it only has legs with us “Birthers”. For now.
LOL! Does William H. Macy know about his other job?
Prayers up for a safe journey and positive findings. Although I wonder why she has to leave the states to get it authenticated. Wouldn’t a fax suffice, must be onto something truly big indeed.
You can even make your own authentic Kenyan birth certifcate from the PDF or Jpeg.
I wonder if she paid some Nigerian scammer for it.
> Although I wonder why she has to leave the states to get it authenticated. Wouldn’t a fax suffice
Possibly the explanation is as mundane as to eyeball the document, take an affidavit from a witness, have a True Copy notarized and placed in safekeeping...
(I doubt she’d be able to uplift the original, but who knows?)
It will be boring Lawyer Reasons, no doubt.
If this document were true, then why isn’t the British Press going nutso about it by posting it on the front pages of their papers?
I guess if the Obama camp can forge documents then we can too?
Don´t get your hopes up, see Post #45.
You can make your own Kenyan birth certificate.
The anti (so-called) birthers may be correct that in the end nobody, including the SCOTUS will do anything to remove Obama, even if they are made to be convinced of his illegitimacy.
Still, if there are any doubts that this man (and his handlers, by the way) have been honest and forthcoming in all of this — about the place of his birth — this should be dutifully pursued.
Not only for the sake of trying to remove this imposter (I believe that he is some kind of imposter and deceiver regardless of his actual place of birth), but for the absolute legitimacy of all future presidential elections.
If the USA is no longer a nation of laws (no more rule of law), if the Constitution is now toilet paper, then somebody needs to be honest and say so.
Non-citizens seem to be encouraged to illegally enter the United States across our southern border by all promises of future amnesty, and the high probability of just simply getting away with it.
The State of Georgia is told by the Feds that they can’t require voters to prove they are citizens.
If citizenship means nothing anymore, I want the rascals in Washington to open their traps and say it honestly -— this so that we who still believe in nationhood and borders can make the decisions we need to make as to how to properly defend our nation, and defend our families.
What does it really mean to “uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC” ??? What does it mean?
And what does it really mean if the people taking that oath encourage, in effect, illegals to sneak into our country illegally by a continous promise of amnesty.
Doesn’t Obama sealing his records and providing no real proof as to the wherabouts of his own birth have something to do with all of that? I deeply believe that it does. Does he not intend to destroy borders and anything remaining of national sovereignty? I believe he does, because every piece of proposed legislation this man has offered or supported thus far is right out of the politics of the Communist Internationalle. He is not to be trusted by the authority of his own word as to where he was born; it must be absolutely verified.
If a president or a candidate for the office (or for any office, for that matter) is allowed to seal his background records up, then we can never trust any candidate for the presidency in the future who does the same.
If the effort to prove the whereabouts of Obama’s birth accomplishes anything, it might accomplish greater vigilance on the part of the Secretaries of State of the several states, and the state electoral commissions in future election cycles.
In such an important matter, the state of Hawaii should not have the right to seal the birth records. Let them do that for their own governor, if the people of Hawaii will tolerate it, but they should not be able to do this for a candidate for the presidency of the United States. I do not understand why the SCOTUS should not declare that Hawaii is under obligation to make Obama’s birth records public. The secretaries of state of the several states should sue before the SCOTUS that Hawaii does not have this right when it comes to any candidate for federal office.
Since the Constitution itself gives specific qualifications of natural-birth citizenship, it is an easy judgment that no state has the right to make laws or to take actions that prevent, hinder, or obstruct absolute verification of natural-birth citizenship where it comes to any individual aspiring to the presidency.
And so, as long as Obama, his handlers, his lackeys, or the State of Hawaii continue to obstruct justice, this should be pursued. It is they themselves who are creating and deepening the doubts about the character.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.