Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Sorry..but I am serious. I don’t believe for a second that there is that deep of a conspiracy involving members of the Bush administration(unless they were dem moles to begin with).
I DO believe that Obama is hiding his BC...and a whole lot of other records,but for what reason.. is not clear yet. Here is what I do know..The Truth Always Rises To The Surface and it will here too.
No. They gave no reason. That was mentioned in the middle of Hour 2 just before Judi McLeod signed off. They said "members of the Bush Administration and even George Bush, himself". I didn't know what to think.
As a result, following the Court in Minor v. Happersett (1875), he turned to the common law. Operating according to jus soli, English common law declared that all children born within the king's realm were subjects of the king except those born of foreign ambassadors or of alien enemies occupying part of the king's dominions, since such children could not be said to be "born within the allegiance, the obedience, or the power, or, as would be said at this day, within the jurisdiction of the King."
Common law doctrine, Gray asserted, was simply adopted by the United States.
The Fourteenth Amendment did not change that situation; it merely reaffirmed it in such a way as to overturn Taney's Dred Scott ruling that limited United States citizenship to whites. The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was included for two reasons. First, it emphasized the common law exceptions of children of ambassadors and occupying armies. Second, it excluded "children of members of the Indian tribes, standing in a peculiar relation to the National Government, unknown to the common law".
SO, who CAN define "Natural born citizen", once and for all?
It SHOULD be Congress. However, in nearly 30 such attempts to define the phrase since the 1870s, such codification has NEVER made it out of committee. Additionally, with more than 17 Amendments to the Constitution since 1789, including 5 Amendments (12th, 20th, 22nd, 23rd, 25th) that deal directly with the office of president, no attempt to define "Natural born citizen" has ever been attempted. Even when Congressman Abercrombie slipped "Whereas the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii" in the non-binding H.R. 593, he stopped short on defining Omama as a citizen, and certainly NOT a "Natural born citizen".
Because of the Legislature's OBVIOUS inability to come to an agreement on this subject, the Supreme Court seems as the only neutral body that can decide this question. In the same way they finally defined "to keep and bear arms" in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), they are the only body that can resolve the matter on how the Framers defined "Natural born citizen".
You post info from a marijuana source website and expect me to believe it?
. This is not just in:
And "But "advised Mr. Craig to seek leave to amend his complaint"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2310719/posts?page=20#20
Although he didn't rule for the plaintiff he did offer an opinion. Natural Born Citizens are NOT Native Born Citizens.
Sounds like BS to me. That kind of stuff just gives the ‘birther’ movement a bad name imho. We should just stick to the facts. The facts are that Obama has not released his real BC..he is hiding many other records that should have been vetted. He may have never been eligible to begin with, because of his father’s citizenship.There are constitutional issues here at stake. End of argument. The rest is just silly talk, unless there is solid proof put on the table.
Words mean things. Precision in writing is a virtue. People can understand what you mean.
Just Judi McLeod's article in Canda Free Press so far and the Laurie Roth radio links further up on this thread. She says that more information will be released next week. They are being really careful about this.
Just got back from the range. Feeling MUCH better, scumbag.
LoL!
About a year ago I listened in on one of Ed Hales radio shows and even through the radio I knew he wasn't being truthful. I say that because I'm wondering- as you were listening- if there was anything you heard that gave you pause- that gave you a sense that you were hearing the truth or not?
To me- this is the single most frightening claim to come out of this whole exhausting year of COLB investigations. If it IS true- then it really needs to be brought out ASAP- and security given to the people involved. If they really have documents proving these claims- the implications are beyond belief and it's time some grownups with guts stood up and said ENOUGH.
Dunno ..
I will say that both guests were being cagy. But, it came across as if it were to protect themselves, as well as their informants. The comment about the Bush Administration set me on my heels, but after I thought about it I realized that I had noticed the same things — a bend-over-backwards effort to be solicitous and gracious to the incoming President.
Did I mention that most of these threats occurred during the period after the election and before the inauguration? McLeod and Hagmann have spent the intervening months chasing down corroborating testimony.
In 2007, Obama voted with his fellow Democrats 97 percent of the time. In 2006, his score was 96, and in 2005, he again netted a 97 percent rating.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23276453/ns/politics-decision_08/
It’s certainly ramping up.
Hard to not sit down and check FR many times a day...
I would assume that some on the Bush team wanted to make nice with the incoming administration for their own career advancement, to stay on the in crown in DC, perhaps paid, perhaps afraid - eunuchs - perhaps were always on the Dems side.
Hard to take you seriously with this at the site to which you linked: “SEE OUR MARIJUANA SEED GUIDE FOR THE BEST STRAINS”
At this stage in the affirmative action bastard's time in office, having openly threatened citizens fro opposing his Marxist policies, the possibilities of actual major riots is much diminsihed. People were under a spell whicvh has now been broken by the revelation that this Marxist prick is more than willing to attack the citizenry to get his way ... and that will not stand so long as the scumbag hasn't got the army to enforce his hellish dreams from his father, the father of lies, a murderer from the start.
Something is blocking the archied show. Can’t get it to open ... ‘Internet explorer cannot open this page’
“Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage” is what one gets when clicking on any of the three hours. The obamanoid slugs have slimed it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.