Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
“the memories of aging Alice Dewey 50 years after the fact as filtered by a newspaper reporter”
Good point. I might also note that I once (& only once) quoted one of SADO’s Seattle friends. Posters rushed out of the woodwork to inform me they’re all liars. It does appear, from what’s been made public, that they are not above lying. Anyone who takes their comments seriously needs to ask themselves about the Seattle friends-of-SADO’s motives. Are they really objective observers, or are they in Obama’s satchel up to their eyebrows?
“For tax purposes, a person with for nationality living in the U.S. is not a resident unless they have been issued a Green Card and have become a Permanent Resident Alien.”
This does not apply to a child or grandchild living in the home or receiving 50% of support.
“For tax purposes, a person with for nationality living in the U.S. is not a resident unless they have been issued a Green Card and have become a Permanent Resident Alien.”
This does not apply to a child or grandchild living in the home or receiving 50% of support.
Seizure is picking and choosing facts to suit his agenda.
Obama was enrolled Jan. 1, 1968 as an Indonesian National at St. Francis Assisi Elementary school.
A reporter interviewed Obama’s sister about family history and reported Obama began living with his grandparents in 1976 because Maya and her mother moved back to Indonesia. The article indicates Maya and her mother were living in Hawaii from 1973 to 1976 without Lolo. The article makes it clear Obama was living with his grandparents while attended high school.
This doesn’t suit Seizure and Brown Deer’s agenda, so it is ignored. Seizure and Brown Deer don’t have proof the Dunham’s took an exemption for Obama on their 1973 tax return, they only assume it because they would have to admit their wrong if they don’t.
“You seem to be the only one that continues to imply that Corsi would have been the one forging the documents.”
I did no such thing and I have already answered all of your argumentative, insincere “questions” (based on false straw-men) in your content-free comment. I don’t appreciate you putting words into my mouth and distorting the record.
At least we agree 100% about the 1973 tax code! See, we CAN play nice, as Jim Robinson just suggested.
“Seizure and Brown Deer don’t have proof the Dunham’s took an exemption for Obama on their 1973 tax return, they only assume it because they would have to admit their wrong if they don’t.”
All:
It is SvenMagnussen who has erroneously claimed that neither Lolo and Ann nor the Dunhams could have legally taken Barry as a dependent because he was not a US citizen, which is totally false.
I have claimed that the Dunhams MAY have taken Barry as a dependent in 1973 because he is their grandchild and taking Barry as their dependent grandchild has NOTHING to do with citizenship or custody if the child is resident in the home and/or 50% of support is provided such as sending the child to boarding school.
*
Sorry, Carp.
Anyone can post almost anything on Wikipedia, whether it’s true, or not.
Not long ago, malicious disinformation about Freepers and Free Republic was posted on Wikipedia. The false information was eventually removed. Wikipedia usually presents accurate scientific information, but politically, occasionally someone has an agenda.
.
I grant you all that from your previous comment, but what I’m trying to say is that nowhere, until the tax return showed up with the immigration file, did anyone notice that Lolo was living in Hawaii regardless of whether he was living with his wife or not. The myth is that zero arrived in Hawaii on his own (he waved goodbye to her at the airport)a year before she did, she sent him to live with his grandparents ‘for his education’ and when she did arrive, they played happy families.
Let me see, at this post I made, 11458 You replied to that post here at 11460 even though that original post was not directed to you. In fact in just the last few days you have posted quit a few times to people who have not posted to you directly in other threads not just this one, but then again you declared in this post" Your approach appears to be to think about things & then throw questions out for consideration & possible discussion. Nothing in the world wrong w that. It’s a discussion forum, after all. Carry on." Right after you wrote this There are drama queens on the thread. Pay no attention to them in that post yet as I pointed out you are the one that inserted yourself into the discussion and obviously can't take your own "pay no attention to them" advice! And I would note that you didn't ping that drama queens either.
You called Fred an idiot here, and nuts here in just the last few days.
Your comment to Brown Deer I haven’t responded to you in going on a yr, & yet you post to me dozens of times a day.
Brown Deer since Sunday has posted comments to 18 other people on a variety of other threads, started 1 thread, and made comments to 14 different people on this thread besides you. You were included in 6 post along with others and 5 post directly to you. That is 11 comments to you from Brown Deer or 0.183 dozen comments/day to you.
Brown Deer has made incredible contributions to the FReerepublic in many areas including at the beginnings of this very thread that caused me to join just a few days after this thread started.
Brown Deer does not have mental issues, Fred Nerks is not an idiot or nuts.
You're not sure what to make of that...but I think I have an idea. He might have been the one who entered the name BHO2 into a background search and up popped the man from Equatorial Guinea. The enigmatic Obama who attended the Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow, the institution to which Jaramoghi Oginga Odinga obtained a number of scholarships, one of which he gave to his own son, the other son Raila, attended a university in East Germany. The background search showed a birthdate for this gentleman written as 8.1.1961 and everyone assumed that was August 1. It's not. He would have carried an Equatorial Guinea passport and the date is written in the european fashion. That's January 8, 1961.
You'll notice that when the article was reprinted a few days later, the names were changed:
Last seen in Washington DC he would be very hot property.
Chuckle; I can vouch for it! Man, you sure did some background search for all that, thanks.
First, you are out & out lying about what I said to Fred Nerks. Why are you lying about me & what I said. KNOCK IT OFF!
Second, you are wholly misrepresenting the whole stalker issue. So let me spell it out for you.
Suppose there is a person who never, ever posts to you. Let’s say you post a dozen or so times to that person, & they never reply.
That just might be a HINT.
But suppose you don’t take the hint. You post to them another three or four dozen time.
That IS a hint.
But you don’t take it. In all, you post to them literally hundreds of times. Never once, in all that time, do they respond. Most of your posts, btw, consist only of insults. [BD did in fact call me “stupid” & “lazy”. Where’s your outrage over that???] & you just keep on doing it day after day after day after day after day etc. etc. etc.
That is anti-social obsessive-compulsive behavior. I haven’t done it to anyone & I can’t imagine doing it to anyone. But it’s been done to me, and you appear to find it offensive that at last it might come to an end. What’s the matter w you? Do you actually LIKE watching anti-social behavior? It’s not pretty, & FR is better off w’out it.
Now stop lying about me. It’s obnoxious. In fact, stop posting to me. You harassed me incessantly yesterday re: Obama’s scars, merely because I said I don’t know how he got them. Now you’re on another tear. How about this: LEAVE ME ALONE. I will return the favor.
I my thought was are they investigating Zero, or scrubbing?
“Anyone can post almost anything on Wikipedia, whether it’s true, or not.”
True, but Wiki has sources and the two sources for the claims are given and I have seen them elsewhere.
When assessing claims regarding records I always ask “Is the claim verifiable? Is there a custodian of the document that can be subpoenaed and if they were would their testimony meet the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE)?
In this case, the answer is yes for both Stanley Ann’s record in the HI transcript archive and for the Anthropology Dept. archive.
Watson: Of course not. He knows you’re an idiot.
“So who should the “HI state AG” be going after for this incident?”
You have created yet another straw man. A discrepancy between the UH transcript records and the UH Anthropology Dept. (part of the same legal entity: the State of HI) cannot give rise to a charge of forgery that would be brought by the AG of that same state of HI entity.
Hawaii would be suing itself!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.