Federal judge dismisses reservist's suit questioning Obama's presidency

YOU: “I would hate to see the courts clogged with the
same foolishness should Bobby Jindal become Pres.”
-
ME: “Jindal is not eligible.”
-
YOU: He was born in the US. Why isn’t he eligible?
-
ME: He is not a “natural born citizen” as required by the constitution.

* United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649

(1898): In this case, the majority of the Court held that a child born in U.S. territory to parents who were subjects of the emperor of China and who were not eligible for U.S. citizenship, but who had “a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the emperor of China” was a U.S. Citizen.

The Court stated that:

The constitution nowhere defines the meaning of these words [citizen and natural born citizen], either by way of inclusion or of exclusion, except in so far as this is done by the affirmative declaration that ‘all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.

Since there was no definition of “natural born citizen” found in the constitution, the majority adopted the common law of England that was a carry over from feudal times.

The court ruled:

It thus clearly appears that by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country, and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, and the jurisdiction of the English sovereign; and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject, unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign state, or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born. III. The same rule was in force in all the English colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the constitution as originally established.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0169_0649_ZS.html

Bobby Jindal is natural born.

I disagree with you and have no time to debate the tangent.
The mother was not of age and the father was a non-citizen.
At any rate, it is moot, as Jindal will never be nominated.

This is not a tangent. Obama’s mother’s age and his father’s alien status mean nothing. According to the Supreme Court in 1898, if you are born here, you are a natural born citizen.