Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tax on 'Rich' People Planned by House Democrats Would Strike a Million U.S. Small Businesses
cns news ^ | July 14, 2009 | Christopher Neefus

Posted on 07/14/2009 11:49:19 AM PDT by Mount Athos

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last
To: Sig Sauer P220

Too bad there’s not enough rich people to actually make this plan work.


61 posted on 07/14/2009 3:58:43 PM PDT by Beaten Valve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
A lot of these high income small businesses are the same folks we all complain about for operating high flying consulting and lobbying jobs where the income already came from government sources.

You know this how ?

62 posted on 07/14/2009 4:33:22 PM PDT by Red Boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

No, a shock would be a democrat that PAYS taxes.


63 posted on 07/14/2009 6:22:49 PM PDT by Yorlik803 ( If this be treason, then lets make the best of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...




Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
(View past Libertarian pings here)
64 posted on 07/14/2009 6:40:07 PM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Boots
You know this how ?

Live and work in DC my friend. All kinds of folks around here do very well with one and two person consulting shops working for World Bank, various agencies, etc. You know, like Tom Daschle's wife that we all used to complain about. You set up a little LLC with yourself as sole proprietor and you start peddling your influence. It's the stuff our democracy is made of.

65 posted on 07/14/2009 7:10:00 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: tnlibertarian
This means 3% less money to invest to expand the company.

Actually, no. There is a $185,000 or thereabouts immediate capital write-off for small businesses, so you can reinvest up to $185,000 and write this off in the current tax year. Only then do you start to have to depreciate your capital investments. Moreover, if you have been investing in your business for the long term, you should already have a lot of recurring depreciation against which you can make new investments.

Anyone who runs a small business already knows this.

And given all the other tax advantages of owning a small business, it is not actually the well-off small businessman (who is the target of this tax) that is getting screwed. It is the salaried workers who get screwed.

Like I said. I am not in favor of raising taxes on anyone. But this particular cult of the sacred small businessman is worshipping another false god.

66 posted on 07/14/2009 7:17:48 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: coydog
"That’s why they’re trying to drive us to “cashless” so they can track every transaction. Look for alcohol, collectibles, black-market tobacco, drugs and ammo - anything small and valuable - to become big-time barter currency. These boneheads NEVER think things through."

Once this happens the Congress will pass laws against "economic crimes", just like the old communist Soviet Union and the ChiComms did. And like North Korea still does. We now have thought crimes (so called "hate crimes") and now we Americans will be designated "financial criminals" if they sell or trade their own personal property without federal government permission. Think of the day when the Federal Government (or even state government) will enact laws that say you have to have government permission to sell your house or just to move to another state. (Hey, it's on it way.)

67 posted on 07/14/2009 7:40:34 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Travis T. OJustice
So what, the plan still sucks. Many are not included in some group you don't like, and their business and the people they employ will get screwed, and in the end, we all pay for it.

I already said I disagree with all new taxes. The people they employ, however are not screwed because their salaries are still deducted as business expenses for net income is computed for tax purposes. No we don't all pay for it.

I don't want the feral gubmint to have more money, and I think that taxes should be cut for everyone. But this small business owner as hero of the country argument is a bit much. The professional who earns a salary has invested just as much, works just as hard, and has just as much at risk, perhaps more.

68 posted on 07/14/2009 7:42:35 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: StormEye

Well, there’ll be a whole lot of “criminals” then. And people just getting fed up and walking away from their property. And riots and shortages and unrest, etc.


69 posted on 07/14/2009 7:52:51 PM PDT by coydog (Proud to have slept through the Obama coronation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
It's the stuff our democracy is made of.

That it may well be. However, your comment implied that it was what the vast mahority of sucessful small businesses were, and therefor we shoulden't worry about taxing them so heavily.

That is not true.

70 posted on 07/15/2009 5:09:44 AM PDT by Red Boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
But this small business owner as hero of the country argument is a bit much. The professional who earns a salary has invested just as much, works just as hard, and has just as much at risk, perhaps more.

Bullcrap. Total garbage. And I am a salaried professional, not a business owner.

71 posted on 07/15/2009 5:10:14 AM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

How’s that Hope and Change going for ya, dumbasses that voted for him??


72 posted on 07/15/2009 5:11:10 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: engrpat
The owner is doing everything he can to keep from laying off anyone but he said that if any of the taxes the democrats want get passed the doors will be closed he won’t be able to make it. Guess this is what they want.

The Dems want small businesses to close. Too many Republicans own small businesses, and small businesses don't employ enough union labor.

The Dems prefer big businesses that they can coerce into making big campaign contributions (if they know what's good for them) and employ lots of union labor.

73 posted on 07/15/2009 5:22:19 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

I am sure you are correct.


74 posted on 07/15/2009 5:27:37 AM PDT by engrpat (A village in Kenya is missing their idiot...lets send him back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
Folks here have to stop hyperventillating and think. First, this tax is net profit, after costs and deductions, of high income earners. Salaries for employees, if any, are already deducted as a business expense, so this does not take a dime from a possible emplioyee.

I used to be a small business owner. Net profit is what you need to expand the business, buy more equipment, rent bigger space, and hire more people. Yes, you can borrow the money, but that just means you go bust at the first downturn in revenue.

High taxes mean that you can't grow the business. And since you generally find yourself with small or negative cash flow for the first few years of a startup, this means that you will have a harder time making back the money once the business finally turns a profit. This means that fewer people will BOTHER taking the risk of starting a business.

75 posted on 07/15/2009 5:28:47 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
Net profit is what you need to expand the business, buy more equipment, rent bigger space, and hire more people. Yes, you can borrow the money, but that just means you go bust at the first downturn in revenue.

Each of thes is already a deductible expense before you calculate net taxable profit. Moreover, a small business can take an immediate deduction of up to $250,000 for capital investments rather than have to depreciate it over time. This tax only applies to the final bottom line reportable net income after all business expenses, including IRA or 401(k) contributions.

Sure, a tax is a tax,and we all hate taxes, but this is not about to destroy small business.

since you generally find yourself with small or negative cash flow for the first few years of a startup, this means that you will have a harder time making back the money once the business finally turns a profit. This means that fewer people will BOTHER taking the risk of starting a business.

As a small business owner, I have no sympathy for folks who cannot do simple accounting or understand a few simple things about tax law. Of course you can carry forward operating losses to offset profits in years to come, or charge it against other current income.

76 posted on 07/15/2009 6:51:43 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Travis T. OJustice

I think you are right but if you take this out a little more the libs won’t be able to find rich people. If govt is going to be the end all for everyone why work? If I can lay around the house all day and still get free money for it I’d be stupid to work.


77 posted on 07/15/2009 6:52:36 AM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sunshine Sister

They’ll chuck you in the gulag. Think soviet russia. It only takes a generation or so to flip everything around.


78 posted on 07/15/2009 6:57:01 AM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Travis T. OJustice

That would be interesting. I wonder what the charge would be? “Defrauding” the gubmint? How times are a changin’.


79 posted on 07/15/2009 7:20:46 AM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson