Posted on 07/10/2009 12:37:29 PM PDT by dr_who
Go pound sand you libertarian!!!
Yes or no - do you believe that marriage should be only between a male and a female?
No, it shows that I'm not a wacko.
No, it simply shows you're in denial.
Once again, I clearly stated we were in the early stages of the implementation of Stalinist techniques and methods of intimidation and repression. It is an incremental process.
In response you again engage in hyperbole and falsely claim I said things I clearly did not, e.g. "If you think we're living in another Cambodia or the Soviet Union, you're delusional." To the contrary, I simply, and quite correctly pointed out that the preliminary techniques, laws and regulations, demonization of "undesirables" by the political elites and media, etc., etc., etc., those precursors which history already shows often lead incrementally to more overt and brutal forms of oppression, all of these are already being implemented right now.
I wouldn't be posting here if I wasn't concerned about the way things are going, but I'm not afraid of being stuck in jail for voting Republican or for that matter, posting on Free Republic.
Nor am I, for the moment. Again you resort to hyperbole while ignoring the actual examples where state-sanctioned intimidation and threats are being applied, some of which I referenced in my previous post. They will go for the most easily demonizable groups and individuals first, e.g. protesters and activists for "undesirable" causes, bloggers and New Media, gun owners, etc.
I'll go further than that and say that Obama isn't to blame for all of the bad precedents that are being set and the current political/economic situation. His predecessor gets much of the blame for that.
Finally we are in complete agreement on something. Obama and Bush are both merely useful operatives in a much bigger plan, one which has been in process a long, long time. Millions of Americans are finally beginning to become aware of this, but unfortunately the hour is very late, perhaps too late...
“That’s what I’m afraid of... that She could be hard to stop in the primaries, but easy for 0bama to roll in the general election. Just like her mentor John McCain”
If you think mccain was her mentor, you got another think coming. obama didn’t roll over mccain either. mccain rolled over FOR obama. mccain picked her because he thought she was a sure loser. She scared him half to death by being a winner in every way possible, and everything he is not and could never be in a million years.
Money began to flow to his campaign. Conservatives got excited and came out to see Sarah by the thousands.
Once he realized how formidible she was, his own campaign set out to destroy her.
HE was a millstone around HER neck.
And my caps work. I gotta respect someone to cap them. I have NO respect for mccain or the rino, treason machine he rode in on.
Should the time come, I will be glad to admit I am wrong...but I hope I am not.
I do want folks (including Sarah and her people) to know that there are literally millions out here like me ready and willing to support her completely in the effort when the time comes.
Depends on what the question is.
Alex:She resigned her position as governor in order that she could successfully run for president.
FWIW it’s also my understanding that serious presidential candidates must earn political capital by building up their party during off year congressional races. I also share your take away from Palin’s resignation speech, that she intends to do just that. Then again, I too may be wrong.
Oh, they’re scared to death of her. Its like a cross to a vampire. Rinos and Rats alike, They all fear her. Good.
"I will go around the country on behalf of candidates who believe in the right things, regardless of their party label or affiliation," she said over lunch in her downtown office, 40 miles from her now-famous hometown of Wasilla — population 7,000 — where she began her political career.
There isn't a political solution to what is screwed up with our country.
The only thing that politics and politicians can do is get out of the way, get out of the private lives of citizens, and let people sink or swim on their own merits.
People tend to lead moral, thoughtful lives when they have the responsibility to do so. When they don't have the responsibility, they do what they like, and to heck with morals.
The solution isn't more "conservative" social programs to fix society's ills. It is many fewer social programs of all types, shapes and sizes.
Would you please enumerate the abuse that Newt Gingrich has suffered?
I would suggest to you a search of press articles and news videos circa 1995 and 1996.
So you have no answer? Just "search for press articles"? You made the accusation, but have no further information about the sorts of things he was unfairly accused of? Not even a hint?
Interesting.
So you have no answer? Just "search for press articles"? You made the accusation, but have no further information about the sorts of things he was unfairly accused of? Not even a hint?,/I>
Anybody who was around in '95 and '96 and who was paying attention saw the daily demonetization of Newt. He was accused of wanting to starve kids and being mean to old people.
Sorry if you were to young to remember that, but I would no further help you with more information on this, similar to if you were to ask me to document that the Pope is Catholic.
LOL, yup.
Sorry if you were to young to remember that, but I would no further help you with more information on this, than I would help you with information that the Pope is Catholic.
Sounds like Change to me....YES!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.