Posted on 06/04/2009 4:59:05 AM PDT by Tolik
There is nothing written in the US Constitution that requires the seating of judges or a Supreme Court Justice based on quotas or ethnicity. That's just another corrupt aberration of these hyphenates.
She is not an objective jurist. She is an "advocate" obsessed with redressing latino grievances from the bench. She is bent on destroying our freedoms as payback for all those Frito Bandito commercials.
We need to see her emails and phone records to determine who controls her and whether she has contacts with foreign governments.
========================================
She is completely absent the necessary judicial temperament---the valuable "judicial gravitas." CBS Evening News pointed that up ...as well as her Achilles heel.......her obsession with latinoism.
REFERENCE CBS Evening News caught her offguard---visiting with Senators. She had clearly been coached------ CBS (bless 'em) explicitly pointed out that she and the Senators were mouthing the same language. Someone off-camera asked her if she was racist. Her visage quickly changed from a smiling senorita to that of a raging bull. CBS kept the camera trained on her. She was furious that gringos were not "respecting" her. Her lips actually moved but no sound came out.... Katie Couric's voice-over clearly noted that, as well.
SCENARIOS If Sonia/Soto says she is pro-life because of her religious faith......Catholic haters PP and Naral will have a cow. If she comes out pro/abortion, Rush can point out her hypocrisy (like fellow Catholics Pelosi, Kerry, Kennedy who PROMOTE abortion).
Rush can then point out that Roe v. Wade can finally be overturned (based on the 14th amendment)......
Time to force people to face the facts.... Obama uses the term "Previable Fetuses" for aborted babies born alive.....lets show 'em "Previable Fetuses" w/ actual pictures and gruesome details of exactly what happens from p/b abortion.
Beg to differ. The Hispanic race is a verifiable race and a distinct culture. The Mexicans are a cross-section of indian tribes that have been closely linked with the Inuit of Alaska as well as the Spanish who, for a time conquered Mexico before disease forced them to abandon the country. This is why there are the primarily brown Mexicans who were descended from the indian tribes, and the white Mexicans who were descended from the Spanish Conquistadors.
South Texas was was not predominantly Hispanic, it was predominantly settled by whites from Germany, France and the Netherlands who migrated here via Pennsylvania and the Ohio valley. South Texas changed hands a number of times depending on which country thought they could control things the best.
The French arrived and are largely responsible for the missions that dominate South Texas but they eventually were overaken by the Spanish. The Spanish held on for as long as they could before ceding the territory to the Mexicans. While the Mexicans ostensibly controlled South Texas, they gave direct control of the territory to empresarios such as Stephen F. Austin, who was responsible for deciding which Americans or immigrants would be allowed to settle the land. This allowed a number of Germans to immigrate into South Texas and develop communities such as New Braunfels, Boerne and Fredricksburg.
After Texas defeated Santa Ana and gained its independence from Mexico, a number of original Mexicans remained in Texas to become what were then called "Texicans" (both Mexicans and Europeans were referred to as Texicans). After Texas was accepted into the Union in the 1840s, the Mexicans continued to immigate into Texas and joined the general migration of people from all walks of life migrating across the US.
Perfect! We split all royalties 50-50.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.