Tiller's Killing: Necessary... But Unlawful

Commonweal Review Magazine ^ | June 3, 2009, 8:07 am | David Gibson

[metmom]

Hey, if you don’t want people *ganging up* on you, don’t post like a DUer in a twisted attempt to support abortion.

You’ve exposed your position for all to see. That cannot be hidden and is not a conservative, pro-life view.

This is FR, not DU. Do not expect your sick rationalizations for abortion to pass muster here.

[metmom]

Looked like a lynch mob to me.

You can play the martyr all you want, but nobody is buying.

Turning it around to make wagglebee look bad is fooling no one.

[humblegunner]

This is FR, not DU.

Thanks, n00bie.

I appreciate your input.

[metmom]

You're right, in retrospect I should have simply pinged you for clarification of your comments before I pinged anyone else.

I beg to differ....

In retrospect, it's really irrelevant that you pinged everyone at the same time. He had already been asked for clarification, and notice the response to you was not clearing up the issue, but attacking you instead?

That's all the clarification I need.

[humblegunner]

You're right, in retrospect I should have simply pinged you for clarification of your comments before I pinged anyone else.

My remarks were out of place.

The failure was mine in lack of clarification.

[humblegunner]

You can play the martyr all you want

Martyr?

You reckon I should be burned at the stake or something?

Again???

[thefactor]

so now murder is 'unlawful'?

this is just like the left calling every long gun an 'assault rifle.'

[wagglebee]

My remarks were out of place.

By remarks do you mean what you wrote in post #36?

[humblegunner]

By remarks do you mean what you wrote in post #36?

Yes, those would be the ones.

I am going to request that they be deleted.

[r9etb]

The logical fallacy being that death was the only way to stop Mr. Tiller’s abortion activities.

[humblegunner]

Request submitted.

[wagglebee]

Thank you.

[humblegunner]

Post deleted.

[humblegunner]

In retrospect, it's really irrelevant that you pinged everyone at the same time.

Blah, blah, blah...

You're just hateful and looking for a victim.

You have focused on me lately but I refuse to be one.

Kick your dog or something.

[xzins]

the need to gather a group to "defeat" one person.

Entirely wrong on a couple of levels. If you'll check our membership dates we've been on FR a long, long, time, and we're friends. Mostly we know which friends will be interested in the same discussion and bring light on it. For example, you might find p-marlowe a bit more radical than wagglebee.

The other thing is that we're not interested in "defeating." Our aim is "conversion." :>)

[wagglebee]

For example, you might find p-marlowe a bit more radical than wagglebee.

It depends on my mood.

[humblegunner]

The other thing is that we're not interested in "defeating." Our aim is "conversion." :>)

I'd really rather not be Catholic, thanks! ;-)

For example, you might find p-marlowe a bit more radical than wagglebee.

I thought P-Marlowe was a lawyer? They are even worse than Catholics! ;-)

Anyway, peace and ceasefire has been established.

Except for certain harridans who wish me burned at the stake.

But I've dealt with that before, no worries.

[xzins]

Aren’t you in for a surprise. We three friends are: Methodist (me); Catholic (wag); and Barn-Burnin’ Charismatic Evangelical (Marlowe).

We’re gonna make a Methocathecharigelical out of you!

(PS: Just adopt our viewpoint on Tiller, and we’re all OK with that. If you become a methocathecharigelical we’ll all have to visit your new denomination to see if we like it. :>)

[xzins]

Except for certain harridans who wish me burned at the stake.

P-M, could you loan Humble, the Severetus Flame-Proof Suit?

[xzins]

Except for certain harridans who wish me burned at the stake.

P-M, could you loan Humble, the Severetus Flame-Proof Suit?