Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pa. GOP Holds Out on Specter
Roll Call ^ | Apr 20, 2009 | By Shira Toeplitz

Posted on 04/20/2009 5:36:26 PM PDT by zaphod3000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 04/20/2009 5:36:27 PM PDT by zaphod3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

Cornyn’s an idiot. And I can say that because I voted for the idiot and he’s my idiot.


2 posted on 04/20/2009 5:39:17 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Party? I don't have one anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

If the GOP backs Specter, I will leave the GOP. I’ve about had enough of RINOs.


3 posted on 04/20/2009 5:41:35 PM PDT by Jaidyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

The “old boys network” is alive and well.


4 posted on 04/20/2009 5:41:38 PM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

I dont think Cornyn’s an idiot. But he’s definitely been friends with the Scotsman too long.


5 posted on 04/20/2009 5:42:34 PM PDT by freespirited (Is this a nation of laws or a nation of Democrats? -- Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Dittos. I’ll be voting for his opposition this time around regardless of who it is.


6 posted on 04/20/2009 5:44:02 PM PDT by TheZMan ("I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

I understand the disgust.
However, it is the job of the Republican Senatorial Committee to support Republican candidates who are running against Democrats, and to support Republican incumbents.
The Senatorial Committee has very little real power.
Elizabeth Dole probably spent too much time running that organization.
It became a campaign issue that probably helped to defeat her.

Let us be clear: ANY group can call itself “Republican” and the Republican decision will be at the ballot box in the primary contest, NEXT YEAR!

The National Republican Trust PAC has already announced that it will work against Specter.


7 posted on 04/20/2009 5:44:16 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

Spectre needs to be put away by James Bond.


8 posted on 04/20/2009 5:45:14 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

It is good news for Toomey that the PA GOP is not endorsing Specter. I heard Michael Steele subbing for Bill Bennett a couple weeks ago and he was asked who the GOP would support. Steele responded that it was up to the PA GOP. If the state party, for PA or any state, does not endorse a candidate, then the RNC will not back a candidate. I hate the thought of RNC money going to Specter. It looks like that won’t be happening. I hope it stays that way.


9 posted on 04/20/2009 5:45:51 PM PDT by vamoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Wait, no, he’s my idiot too. I voted for him. I sent him an e-mail protesting his support of Specter but, so far, no response.


10 posted on 04/20/2009 5:47:04 PM PDT by Juan Medén
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

>> and to support Republican incumbents.

Really? That’s some kind of official policy?

If so it’s not a wise one.

I can see the Senate chair supporting the (R) against the (D) in the general. But knee-jerk support for a loser like Specter against a real conservative like Toomey — especially when that support comes from a guy like Cornyn who poses as a conservative — is just dim-witted.


11 posted on 04/20/2009 5:47:16 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Party? I don't have one anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Juan Medén

>> I sent him an e-mail protesting his support of Specter but, so far, no response.

You should get your vaguely worded standard response in six to eight weeks.


12 posted on 04/20/2009 5:54:46 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Party? I don't have one anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

And the party hierarchy continues its march off the cliff. And it’s where they belong, problem is, they are taking us and the country with them.

Oxygen wasters.

They are going to sabotage Palin or any other conservative that rises to the top. And the really disgusting thing is that they will cooperate with the media to do it.


13 posted on 04/20/2009 5:54:50 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

“Cornyn’s an idiot. And I can say that because I voted for the idiot and he’s my idiot.”

Yeah, he’s my idiot too. And, I understand his logic about supporting Specter. I would be willing to hold my nose with that except Specter(Specter) has a history of turning on Republicans as soon as being re-elected. He did it to Bush the last go round. So, I say turn Specter loose and let him twist in the wind. I am going to send Cornyn an email and give him my two bits about Specter. Doubt that it will do any good other than making me feel better...


14 posted on 04/20/2009 5:56:17 PM PDT by snoringbear (Government is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

LOL — got that right.


15 posted on 04/20/2009 5:56:39 PM PDT by Juan Medén
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
I said the Republican Senatorial Committee, this is a very small group, controlled by incumbent Republicans.

Think of this logically: would you like it if such a Committee DID take sides in a Primary?

THAT could lead to real tyranny.

This Committee should listen to the voices of the primary voters, YES!

However, would you want this group to make endorsements in an “open primary” where NO incumbent was running?

Think this through. Let the incumbent Republicans do what incumbents do. It does not much matter.

The voters will decide this matter!

In trying to get what we want, lets not destroy the true neutrality of institutions that don't do what we want.

When Toomey wins, Toomey will be endorsed by this committee, even if Toomey has a challenger in 7 years.

16 posted on 04/20/2009 5:56:56 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2181685/posts

Specter to buck party, vote for stimulus ($6.5b pay to play?)
Scraton Times ^ | February 09, 2009 | BORYS KRAWCZENIUK

Concerned about the nation’s “very severe economic recession,” U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter said today he plans to vote for Senate Democrats’ economic stimulus package, despite the political risk.

“If we don’t act, we may find ourselves in a depression like 1929,” Mr. Specter said after visiting the Schott Glass Technologies plant in Duryea. “That has to be avoided.”

Mr. Specter, a Republican and part of a bipartisan group of senators who worked on the proposal, said the $827 billion Senate version is far less expensive than what Democratic Senate leaders originally proposed.

“It cuts the Democratic proposal by $110 billion, which is a lot of money,” he said, noting criticism of the Senate proposal by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. “So that’s a sign we must be on the right track.”

(snip)

“Well, of course I am,” Mr. Specter said when asked if he’s worried about the conservative backlash. “But (President) John Kennedy had it right. He said, ‘Sometimes the party asks too much.’ And this is something I think is necessary for the country. It goes beyond politics. It goes beyond the Democratic or Republican position. It’s the right thing for America.”

Mr. Specter said he would have supported the package even if Democrats had not added $6.5 billion in additional money for the National Institutes of Health to the final version of the bill.

Mr. Specter had sought the money for years, and had mentioned that he wanted the money in the bill when he met with President Barack Obama last week.

“That’s only one small part ... That’s not determinative in my mind,” he said.

The stimulus vote could create “a political problem,” he said, but “I thought the public interest was so important that I have to take whatever problems it brings me.”


17 posted on 04/20/2009 5:57:34 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

One other thing:

Don’t GIVE to the Senatorial Committee, give money only to the candidates that you support.


18 posted on 04/20/2009 6:00:05 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

>> Think of this logically: would you like it if such a Committee DID take sides in a Primary?

You’re not making sense... Cornyn (as Republican Senatorial Chair) IS!! taking sides in the primary.

I’m suggesting that the chair NOT!! take sides at all in the primary — ANY primary.

Their role should be ONLY to help the Republican THAT THE STATE SELECTS WITHOUT THEIR “HELP” elected. Period.


19 posted on 04/20/2009 6:03:02 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Party? I don't have one anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

>> Don’t GIVE to the Senatorial Committee, give money only to the candidates that you support.

You got THAT one right! :-)


20 posted on 04/20/2009 6:04:07 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Party? I don't have one anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson