Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy snipers had multiple chances to shoot Somali pirates (Obama waits until Captain nearly killed)
LA Times ^ | 4/13/2009 | Julian E. Barnes and Greg Miller

Posted on 04/13/2009 6:07:49 PM PDT by tobyhill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-248 next last
Comment #121 Removed by Moderator

To: dirtboy

I think the military does things in a calculated manner and with good training. And from the results of their operation, it appears that they did it just right...


122 posted on 04/13/2009 8:31:18 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Wanting the enemy to live is a good way to get Americans killed.

By killing those pirates we are going to have a harder time getting the release of the other 200+ hostages without them being harmed. Of course not much is being done to get their release anyway.

Don't get me wrong I would have taken care of this pirate problem years ago before there where hostages if I was in power to do so but sometimes you have to look at the long range picture.

123 posted on 04/13/2009 8:32:20 PM PDT by tc45a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

Most Kenyans know? Most Africans know about the Islamic Luo tribe.

This whole thing was planned. Probably means billions in aid and millions of green cards.


124 posted on 04/13/2009 8:33:10 PM PDT by Frantzie (Boycott GE - they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC & Universal. Boycott Disney - they own ABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
And from the results of their operation, it appears that they did it just right

What part of "The military official said the SEAL snipers had multiple opportunities to shoot the pirates" do you not understand? Instead, the SEALs ended up having to shoot night vision at a boat pitching in six-foot swells. I am very grateful they were up to the task, but I would have rather they have been given carte blanche to shoot at the first opportunity.

125 posted on 04/13/2009 8:35:19 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: tc45a
Don't get me wrong I would have taken care of this pirate problem years ago before there where hostages if I was in power to do so but sometimes you have to look at the long range picture.

The pirates now know we will kill them if they attack American-flagged vessels. The hostages IMO are the problem of other countries who fail to protect their own flagged ships.

126 posted on 04/13/2009 8:36:41 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
But the SEALs should have been allowed to kill the pirates at the first viable opportunity

The lifeboat was originally 200-300+ yards away. Sounds pretty difficult to hit them. The Seals and the Navy did right. They waited until they had a better shot.

The Seals are elite and the best in the world but they are still human and can make mistakes. They are trained to wait until the best oppurtunity presents itself. That is exactly what happened here.

127 posted on 04/13/2009 8:37:34 PM PDT by tc45a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: tc45a

What part of “The military official said the SEAL snipers had multiple opportunities to shoot the pirates” do you not understand?


128 posted on 04/13/2009 8:38:38 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Well, you might have multiple chances, but if you are further away, you’re possible success is reduced, even when you do have that chance.

So, if you manage to get the lifeboat tethered to the ship and at a close distance, you’ve just increased your chances. That’s one item.

And then, if you have four pirates that you have to take out all at once, but you manage to get one onboard with you, you’ve increased your chances by eliminating one from the equation, being that you don’t have to be sure to take out four at one time, but only three at one time.

You’ve increased your chances, once again...

And that’s how you get a successful operation with the highest chance of success, and not simply the *first time* you get a shot off... (with a lower chance for success...).

You see..., you don’t just “jump” at any chance you get, you go for the odds and the *best chance* you get and you “work the situation” in your favor and you do so with “calculation” and with “patience”... :-)


129 posted on 04/13/2009 8:39:48 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: tc45a
They are trained to wait until the best oppurtunity presents itself. That is exactly what happened here.

Somehow, waiting until dark with increasing seas, and having to take a shot at targets on a lifeboat pitching up and down two or three feet is not optimal when you had daylight shots earlier with calmer seas. Your opinions are not based on what is being reported from the scene.

130 posted on 04/13/2009 8:40:32 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
IT'S A TAIL WAGES THE DOG SCENARIO

The Pirates obviously had no real intention of killing the captain. Up until this week no known hostage has ever been killed by the Somali Pirates.

They had a U.S. Navy Destroyer breathing down their back and did not act suicidal.

It seems an unnecessary escalation of an already volatile area that will now be beckoning the U.S. Navy to confront more than a few teenagers, Type 56s, and a dingy.

All for an Obama tough guy headline. He looks tough now.

131 posted on 04/13/2009 8:40:46 PM PDT by Patas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
They are trained to wait until the best oppurtunity presents itself. That is exactly what happened here.

With all due respect, you're blowing stuff out of your arse here.

By the statements in this article, the SEALs had multiple viable shots before they took the ones at the end. Byt the statements in other articles, the shots taken were at night at a pitching boat. I'm not a sniper or anything resembling a marksman, but if a SEAL team says they had shots and did not take them, it means they had confidence they could have hit the targets much earlier, and that should have been the priority, and NOT to wait for a gun to be pointed at the captain with intent to kill him.

132 posted on 04/13/2009 8:43:41 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
Washington insiders and federal government bureaucrats are rushing right now to prepare for some unthinkable circumstances. It’s absolutely vital you read the urgent message below from Lee Bellinger, publisher of Independent Living.

Yea, we know. The question is when will our liberal brothers wake up? And yes, we're brothers, take that back to DU or wherever......

133 posted on 04/13/2009 8:44:07 PM PDT by ScreamingFist (Annihilation - The result of underestimating your enemies. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Your opinions are not based on what is being reported from the scene.

That's right. None of us where there and we don't know the reasons behind every move or what was discussed behind the scenes...or what the long term goal was. We will probabaly never know the true discussions because that will hurt future efforts in the same sitaution.

Besides, this is still a fresh story. Multiple "truth's" will probabaly be written obout this over the next few months.

134 posted on 04/13/2009 8:47:12 PM PDT by tc45a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: fso301

Good point.

If I were one of those commanders I believe I could have easily misunderstood “hold on” to “weapons free.” Radios garble a lot you know.....and the commander knows the situation better than any community organizer who is waiting for a teleprompter to tell him what to do.


135 posted on 04/13/2009 8:47:57 PM PDT by Loud Mime (If Christians cannot unite in battle to save this nation, it will be lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; Star Traveler
By the statements in this article,

Yeah we know that everything printed is true. Have you ever thought the Navy is sounding out fake stories about this to confuse the pirates?

136 posted on 04/13/2009 8:49:25 PM PDT by tc45a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: tc45a
or what the long term goal was

The long-term goal as stated in the article was a peaceful resolution. And that is why the SEALs held off when they had shots earlier in the day when conditions were better. And that is my entire point. The SEALs should have had the order to shoot at first viable opportunity to end it.

137 posted on 04/13/2009 8:49:48 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Well, like I said, that’s the way I see it. It looks like a perfectly calculated situation and the military played it just right...

I can’t say too much more than that... it was a great success...


138 posted on 04/13/2009 8:50:26 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: tc45a
Yeah we know that everything printed is true. Have you ever thought the Navy is sounding out fake stories about this to confuse the pirates?

Have you ever thought that there is no tactical reason to tell pirates that SEALs will pass on kill shots when they have the opportunity?

139 posted on 04/13/2009 8:50:49 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
A new report by the Army War College’s Strategic Studies Institute states flatly the U.S. military must prepare for “a violent, strategic dislocation inside the United States” that could be provoked by “unforeseen economic collapse” or “loss of functioning political and legal order.”

I've been through this nonsense before on FR and have read the report in question, which is here:

http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubID=890

It's not exactly a secret, not exactly new, not really a "report" but a theoretical paper, not "stated flatly", and not something that these charlatans and many others of their ilk will openly disclose you to, so that you can read the paper yourself.

This is really a crock, from a crock of a gloomer and doomer "publisher". He really knows how to scare the wits out of his target audience, and then milk them for his kooky "insider intelligence reports."

What a crock.

140 posted on 04/13/2009 8:51:58 PM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-248 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson