Court Allows Oklahoma Workers to Have Guns in Vehicles

The Oklahoman ^ | February 19, 2009 | ROBERT E. BOCZKIEWICZ

[SoldierDad]

LOL. Pretty much, yes.

[Carry_Okie]

ICUO, here is the correct fix:

106 A person that owns or controls a parking area that is subject to this chapter and that
107 complies with the requirements of Section 34-45-103 is not liable in any civil action for any
108 occurrence resulting from, connected with, or incidental to the use of a firearm, by any person,
109 unless the use of the firearm involves a criminal act by the person who owns or controls the
110 parking area.

The more I think about this question, the more this becomes the only practicable solution. In a civil case with a jury thinking to redress the grievance of, for example, an injury to an innocent bystander, I wouldn't want to be the owner without this protection. Any indemnification based upon compliance places the owner in the position of showing compliance as a defense. There is simply no way for the owner to assure that the conditions of the statute are met.