Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What is there to celebrate about Darwin’s 200th birthday?
CMI ^ | February 12, 2009 | Tas Walker

Posted on 02/11/2009 5:26:59 PM PST by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 next last
To: whattajoke; ToGodBeTheGlory
You must be a blast at the church picnics.



“Could it be…SATAN?”
121 posted on 02/12/2009 8:20:46 AM PST by Caramelgal (Today is my Birthday. Happy B-day to me and Abe and Chuck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Evo-atheists are always oblivious to plain historical facts. It makes denying the Word of God that much simpler.


122 posted on 02/12/2009 8:25:15 AM PST by ToGodBeTheGlory ("Darwinism" is Satanism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke

Yes, at some point it is hard to distinguish zealotry from parody. But I agree, as parody it would be hard to take it any further and still get a laugh.


123 posted on 02/12/2009 8:30:57 AM PST by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: ToGodBeTheGlory
They have no respect for the tights that God bestowed upon us all.

Do these wacky religious clothing codes really matter?

124 posted on 02/12/2009 8:39:42 AM PST by Oztrich Boy ( As for a future life, every man must judge for himself between conflicting vague probabilities. - D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

What is there to celebrate?

For you, that’s easy, you get to post 10 articles and say the same thing over and over again.

You need a chalkboard, on which you can write endlessly

Charles Darwin is a great big poopy pants (as that does seem to be what is left when you boil your posts down).


125 posted on 02/12/2009 9:25:40 AM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dmz

==Charles Darwin is a great big poopy pants

You said it, not me. d:op


126 posted on 02/12/2009 9:28:24 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke

Thank you for clearing up that you didn’t mean to attack that fella’s service- it was unfortunately an unforunate choice of wording that led me to that conclusion, and htank you for making it clear that htat is not what you meant.


127 posted on 02/12/2009 9:32:23 AM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
At the time of writing his Origin of the Species, he had completely rejected God's word, and pledged his hostility thereto in his oath to become a member of an elite club of wealthy and powerful men known as the "Ghostly Guild."

At the time Darwin wrote the first sketch of his theory in 1839, Brooke Foss Westcott was 14 years old.

128 posted on 02/12/2009 10:27:08 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

Why praytell should we not expect the “end of days” anytime soon?


129 posted on 02/12/2009 10:49:22 AM PST by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: js1138

At the time of publication, he was a member of GG.


130 posted on 02/12/2009 10:52:09 AM PST by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Suppose Darwin ate babies for breakfast. How would that affect the correctness of his theory?


131 posted on 02/12/2009 10:54:12 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: js1138

Suppose every scientist all at once believed that the entire universe was designed by a ‘supreme being’ — how would this affect science?


132 posted on 02/12/2009 2:15:59 PM PST by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
And what idea underpinned the Crusades, the Inquisition, the French Wars of Religion, the 30 Years War, etc., etc., etc.?

I've been scanning New Testament scripture and I just can't find any instruction regarding any of these...

133 posted on 02/12/2009 2:42:13 PM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
I hope they don’t intend to celebrate in the public square...otherwise, I demand equal representation to erect my creationist display.

GREAT point. Darweenies want to pretend as though not having a religious belief is somehow the default, neutral position when it's clearly not.

134 posted on 02/12/2009 2:45:22 PM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
I've been scanning New Testament scripture and I just can't find any instruction regarding any of these...

How about finding out where in "Origin of the Species" Darwin promoted Nazism or Communism? Any luck there?

135 posted on 02/12/2009 3:35:31 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Just look at the full title:

On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured [b]Races[/b] in the Struggle for Life.

It’s the same struggle that Hitler was talking about for the preservation of the Aryan race. There is a direct line from Darwin to Hitler; evolution leads to the gas chambers.


136 posted on 02/12/2009 3:58:54 PM PST by ToGodBeTheGlory ("Darwinism" is Satanism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Feynman

Because only CERTAIN people here on Freeper KNOW what and how God’s plan was. Obviously we are not in that elite group.


137 posted on 02/12/2009 4:07:52 PM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie (GROWN -UPS RULE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels
Why praytell should we not expect the “end of days” anytime soon?

Because I called it off.

138 posted on 02/12/2009 5:02:42 PM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

His works provided a pathway, eugenics and so on.

Any time you move away from God, bad things happen.


139 posted on 02/12/2009 5:06:37 PM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

The U.S. courts correctly looked at religion functionally (not if a ‘god’ is involved). Although ’a god’ is not involved in Darwinism, Darwinism is involved in religion. Just look at Atheism, Secular Humanism, Scientology, Transcendental Meditation and Wicca, all of which have all been held by U.S. courts to be religions according to the U.S. Constitution.


140 posted on 02/12/2009 5:59:08 PM PST by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson