Skip to comments.
Vought retirees find, restore World War II Corsair fighter
FWST ^
| 1-24-09
| BOB COX
Posted on 01/24/2009 9:25:30 AM PST by Dysart
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: Dysart
I’ve been in these Vought work hangers many times over the past years but not much since I started working remotely. I need to head back over to see how the plane looks completed.
21
posted on
01/24/2009 10:05:32 AM PST
by
DesertSapper
(God, Family, Country . . . . . . . . . . and dead terrorists!!!)
To: AGreatPer
“Yea, that was fun. After you put the paper on it you would wet it. When it dried and shrunk it was ready for the paint. Cutting those pieces out of balsa wood was not easy. Loved the smell of Testors glue. “
Hot “Fuel Proof” Dope ping!
22
posted on
01/24/2009 10:06:26 AM PST
by
headstamp 2
(Been here before)
To: tanknetter
Interesting. I’ve never heard that we reverse engineered Zero tech during the War. I’d like to read more about it.
23
posted on
01/24/2009 10:06:43 AM PST
by
Dysart
(Democracy is a theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard)
To: jazusamo
Were these mostly land based vs. carrier based planes?
24
posted on
01/24/2009 10:08:26 AM PST
by
headstamp 2
(Been here before)
To: AGreatPer
Loved the smell of Testors glue. I nearly made the same comment in reply to the first post who referenced the model building. I can still smell that "aroma." Haha It explains a great deal...
25
posted on
01/24/2009 10:13:27 AM PST
by
Dysart
(Democracy is a theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard)
To: Dysart
Interesting. Ive never heard that we reverse engineered Zero tech during the War. Id like to read more about it.
Good information to start with
here
There have been a number of discussion on the subject over on the forums at
WIX as well
To: headstamp 2
I believe most all the Marine F4U’s in WWII were land based but carrier capable but not absolutely sure.
27
posted on
01/24/2009 10:17:56 AM PST
by
jazusamo
(But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
Beautiful bird there, and from my old outfits ancestor,
I was in VMA-223 which was the attack designation given
to VMF units later on. Even has our logo on the nose, a fightin bulldog with boxing gloves and a doughboy helmet.
The Zero gained speed and manuverability at the cost of weight, it had little armor and did not have self sealing
fuel tanks till later if at all.
Oh those props on the Corsair were some 13 feet in diameter.
28
posted on
01/24/2009 10:20:17 AM PST
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: headstamp 2
Were these mostly land based vs. carrier based planes?
I believe they were originally intended to be carrier based but were almost impossible to land on the carriers so the Marines used them as land based squadrons
29
posted on
01/24/2009 10:20:28 AM PST
by
slumber1
To: Dysart
30
posted on
01/24/2009 10:27:37 AM PST
by
fso301
To: slumber1
I believe they were originally intended to be carrier based but were almost impossible to land on the carriers so the Marines used them as land based squadrons
The issue was with the oleos on the main gear being too stiff. When the aircraft trapped, it had a tendency to bounce. And bounce and bounce and bounce.
Not a good thing.
So the Corsairs were relegated to USMC squadrons operating ashore until the gear problem was addressed. As the reengineering was going on the F6F entered service in numbers and proved itself to be more than capable of being the fleet's primary fighter. Corsairs did eventually make it back into the fleet (and also into other nations' carrier air arms ... the Royal Navy flew a version of the Corsair with clipped wings that could fit into it's carriers' lower-ceiling hangar decks), but too late to really supplant the F6F.
To: slumber1
I’ll bet there are a few former Marine aviators on this board who will point out that, when Navy pilots found the F4U “almost impossible to land on carriers”, the Marines went ahead and did it! A few years back I worked with a former Marine pilot from the 1945 era who flew them off a carrier. His favorite story was about encountering a flight of lost USAAF P-38s who asked the Marines for a steer to any handy airbase. They led the AAF guys to their carrier and invited them to drop in for coffee. (They knew that Okinawa was barely out of sight).
To: tet68
I can’t remember where I got that pic, had it a long time. I have it on my computer for my home page. I built models for years and love WWII vintage fighters. Years ago I built an RC F4U 36” wingspan, it’s a beauty and my grandson still has it.
About a year ago I had a Comcast tech out for an Internet problem and he asked me if that was me flying it, I told him no because if I get more than ten feet off the ground my stomach starts feeling funny. LOL!
33
posted on
01/24/2009 10:32:58 AM PST
by
jazusamo
(But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
To: Dysart
I also learned this week that the F-4U is the only piston-engined fighter to shoot down a jet fighter. It happened against a Mig-15 during the Korean War.
34
posted on
01/24/2009 10:35:01 AM PST
by
Redleg Duke
("Sarah Palin...Unleashing the Fury of the Castrated Left!")
To: Dysart
Chance Vought F4U Corsair on display at the Marine Corps Museum in Quantico, VA
This FREE museum shouldn't be missed. I had a great time there with my son's recruiting (poolee) class.
35
posted on
01/24/2009 10:37:22 AM PST
by
shoptalk
To: Dysart
Trivia question:
Do you know why the wings were shaped that way?
36
posted on
01/24/2009 10:38:54 AM PST
by
zeebee
To: slumber1; jazusamo; headstamp 2
As I recall from my past readings, the Navy did indeed want to put the Corsairs on the carriers. However they were unable to figure out how to land them safely so the Corsairs were initially land based. The Brits figured it out right away and had Corsairs landing on their carriers two years before the Navy figured it out. (No linky, sorry)
37
posted on
01/24/2009 10:39:01 AM PST
by
Enterprise
(A Representative Republic - gone now. Foolish people.)
To: advance_copy
"If I was filthy rich, that is something I would have.
Oh man. I would have a Mustang, a P-38 Lightning, a Corsair, a Thunderbolt and a B-17.
38
posted on
01/24/2009 10:41:41 AM PST
by
Enterprise
(A Representative Republic - gone now. Foolish people.)
To: GOP_Party_Animal
To: tanknetter
Thank you for the excellent resources. I like this part...
During "The War," Grumman was an outstanding example of American productivity, employing 20,000 workers, few of whom had ever worked in the aircraft industry before; many of them were women. Bethpage was a happy place; there were no strikes, work stoppages, nor unions. Grumman took care of its employees with daycare centers for working mothers, social events for all, Christmas turkeys, and the famous "Green Car Service" to help employees with dead batteries and other minor problems. 12,000 planes in 3yrs. Wow.
And also this one re the Hellcat from one E Valencia: " one of the Navy's top aces, quipped. "I love this airplane so much, that if it could cook, I'd marry it."
(Could he get away with that comment now without being vilified?===rhetorical)
40
posted on
01/24/2009 10:43:02 AM PST
by
Dysart
(Democracy is a theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson