Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Today, A proposed amendment to the Constitution.. Abolishing the Electoral College!
GovTrack: Senate Record: ^

Posted on 01/12/2009 12:00:00 PM PST by thatjoeguy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Star Traveler

I’ve seen in other posts here we are only two states away from that.

JB


41 posted on 01/13/2009 5:52:44 AM PST by thatjoeguy (Just my thoughts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: thatjoeguy

You said — “I’ve seen in other posts here we are only two states away from that.”

Yeah, you’re talking about the request for a “Constitutional Convention,” by the states, in order to place a balanced budget amendment in the Constitution. And that’s true of that one. The problem that many have with this one is that they don’t want to open the door to a “Constitutional Convention” — versus — having simply a Constitutional Amendment to ratify (which is a different matter).

Now, prior to this one (above), there was also an Amendment that had no time limit on it (for ratification) and it finally got ratified over two hundred years later.... LOL... That’s a “done deal” — it’s been ratified already and has already made it into the Constitution...


42 posted on 01/13/2009 7:54:40 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Oh um,,, yeah, I knew that LOL

Brain on vacation here... leave a message.
JB


43 posted on 01/13/2009 11:08:23 AM PST by thatjoeguy (Just my thoughts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: yorkie01
Correct. And like Kanada, the mob rule of the population centers like Montreal will over power the Conservative western provinces taking away the voice and sanity of rural populations.

Amerika will become the complete Nationalist Socialism that the Democrats have always dreamed about.

But hey! don't stop there, they will ramrod this and other massive Leftist agendas through like water through a goose. Especially with those juicy “Crisis” agendas they can claim as their reason for so many drastic measures.

This is really going to get ugly.

44 posted on 01/13/2009 11:20:49 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (WHAT? Where did my tag line go? (ACORN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: geo40xyz
OK:-) BUT only if coupled with: * Congressional pay must be reduced by 80% with NO postage privileges * Terms limited to six years * ALL Presidential candidate MUST provide 'proof' of birth before running * NO medical insurance for Congress folks * One can NOT run for another Federal or State office while seated in Congress * One can NOT take any job associated with Federal or State or any Contractor for three years after leaving Congress * Each voter must have a valid Federal or State photo ID to vote

One more:

-- All congresspeople, senators and house members, will be considered employees of the state from where they were elected. No federal benefits or salaries. Whatever salaries and benefits are to be gotten will be from each state. Any bills or policies proposed or to be considered for votes must first be presented to the people of their respective states before it is voted on. They are, after all, employees of the states who are in Washington at the behest of the people of those states. It seems that when in Washington, the senators or house critters start to forget that they are there to represent their constituents. They become power hungry and start working for their political parties and for power grabs.
45 posted on 01/13/2009 11:26:29 AM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: adorno
Any bills or policies proposed or to be considered for votes must first be presented to the people of their respective states before it is voted on.

That and one more...

Any proposal for changes to the constitution must originate from a state. Each and every state is after all, a signatory to that constitution and if any changes are to be made, then any changes must originate from the states. In essence, the legislators and governor from a state can propose a change, or even a U.S. senator or U.S. house member, but the proposal must first be approved by the state, including the people through the state legislature and governor. The only job for the state's representatives at the national level would then be to work for the passage of that constitutional change. Or for the disapproval and voting down of the change if the change is from a different state and the change wouldn't be beneficial to the state that he/she represents.
46 posted on 01/13/2009 11:44:19 AM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson