Posted on 11/30/2008 5:03:43 AM PST by Kaslin
Gays are treated as more dangerous than felons, drug offenders and known child abusers -- none of whom is categorically barred from adopting.
What Mr. Chapman's statement proves is that the law needs to be changed to bar the above from adopting - not that gays are any more able to adopt.
According to evidence cited by the judge,
I'm sure you could get that "evidence" right off the NAMBLA or GLAAD web sites.
gays are slightly more likely than heterosexuals to suffer psychiatric problems, engage in substance abuse and smoke
Homosexuality is an unrecognized and untreated sexual developmental disorder that causes untold miseray and suffering and causes its sufferers to die by an average age of 42. See, I can cite "evidence", too.
Would orphaned and abandoned children be better off if every one of them could be raised by stable, loving, heterosexual couples? Possibly.
Mr. Chapman totally fails to understand the difference between possible and probable.
Isn’t Townhall supposed to be a conservative website? Why are the allowing sodomite propaganda?
let's ignore infidelity and domestic violence, rates of abadonment and separation of partners, just for the sake of argument. Afterall, those are probably the greater issues in heterosexual relationships which lead to instability in the child-rearing environment.(sarc). Legislating from the bench anyone?
Thanks for the link. Very informative. Every gay person should read it
If overturning the nation’s laws against same sex sodomy by judicial fiat was really JUST about the actions of consenting adults in private, why is it being taught in schools, why was homosexual activity between adults and minors (or homosexual activity by ANYONE under 18) legalized by the decision?
When does the adopted child consent to be brought into an alternative lifestyle and raised by 2 members of the same sex?
The APA?
You got to be kiddin me....why didn’t the judge just use FactCheck.org?
Pathetic ruling.
Those poor kids.
not to mention little johnny knows his two daddy’s are having anal and oral sex with each other right across the hall.
yeh, that a REEEAAALLL normal house to grow up in.
No psychological damage THERE!
makes me sick.
Gay people have psychological illness not news to normal people.
What an idiotic rationalization.
What about PROTECTING a child's right to be raised in a setting that best approximates life how NATURE intended? What about the childrens rights to have their SAFETY considered before they are FORCED to be the fantasy fulfilling child in a sick, demented gay fantasy role playing game, using live human children? Ignoring the evidence that gays are highly likely to be pedophiles, and have very violent "relationships" which are very short in duration is hardly considering the child's rights.
But it is a sick, demented application of "equal treatment under the law". Forcing an innocent baby into a life of abuse by mentally unstable demented sexual predators is not what "equal treatment under the law" meant to adress.
When this child resurfaces in their early 20's as a serial killer, with no emotion whatsoever, driven to perform horrific sexual abuses on his victims, The famillies of his victims can thank this liberal judge for saying it's the 'right' sexual deviates to adopt human babies and form their minds to think the sexual abuse done to them while being raised by the entire gay community (that is how many gay partners the adoptive gay "parent" will have had over the span of this childs youth)is "normal.
I happen to think that gay adoption and their quest to create an artificial family is far worse than gay marriage.
I don't really care about gays coupling together. It's their effect on children that is scary.
Imagine the psychological damage this child will have after a childhood filled with memories of being the child host, fetching drinks and snack food for all “daddies friends” at gay parties.
By the time any child is 10 they’ll have seen every kind of sexual act imaginable, and probably been victim (although willing in his mind)to many of them.
How, when there are 50 years worth of child abuse by gays cases to use as evidence for why children should NEVER be anywhere near gays, no matter what role they are playing, can any sane judge throw children to these wolves?
They’re not ‘gays’ they’re homosexuals. There is no need to use derogatory terms, but euphemisms are not acceptable either.
No.
Yeah - the APA.
The outfit that a few years ago published a paper claiming that sex between adults and children wasn’t necessarily contrary to the best interests of the child.
I’ve talked about this for some time. When gay marriage is allowed and treated as equivalent of a normal marriage, they have equal rights to adopt —— including, perhaps, AFFIRMATIVE ACTION in adoption for past discrimination.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.