Barack Obama: Born in Hawaii

Hawai`i Free Press ^ | Nov 7 2008 | Andrew Walden

[palmer]

Why is Obamas step grandmother and two of his siblings insisting that they were present at his birth in Kenya?

Don't know. The only evidence I have heard about is a recording by Berg who is a bit of a loony. Is there more evidence than that? Also has someone come up with a reason they would have gone to Kenya?

[palmer]

Read the thread again.

It's 6000 posts, can you give me a hint?

[null and void]

I could.

Here’s one hint. It’s near where you said we invented the whole thing.

You found that with no problem, didn’t you?

[DJ MacWoW]

Dude you have no proof or witnesses that gainsay Sara Obama or his siblings. Give it up.

[palmer]

You never answered this simple question: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2040486/posts?page=1502#1502

Why did they go to Kenya?

[null and void]

Yes I did.

They got married.

They went to visit the in-laws, and to honeymoon.

Apparently WOSG couldn’t wrap his head around the concept that newlyweds go on honeymoon, and new family members get introduced to old family members.

Can you?

[DJ MacWoW]

Why did they go to Kenya?

Why does the reason matter? It doesn't.

[null and void]

True, but having a reason seems to be more important than the fact that her since silenced in-laws said they met her there, and were with her when Barrack, Jr. was born.

[DJ MacWoW]

It’s like the question “Why did the chicken cross the road?”

[palmer]

Like everything else on that thread, you made up the honeymoon. You also said they could get a passport for the little tyke without a birth certificate. But you showed not one shred of actual evidence for any of them (except numerous postings of potentialities like state dept rules).

You said there should be evidence like baby showers and doctors reports. There being none, you made the claim that no evidence exists for a honolulu birth. So you had it both ways, presenting no evidence for Kenya, yet demanding evidence for Honolulu.

[palmer]

The reason matters if you have no evidence to back it up (except for the now silenced in-laws of course).

[DJ MacWoW]

The reason matters if you have no evidence to back it up

No. It doesn't. Obama Sr was from Kenya. It isn't odd that they would go there.

[palmer]

They went to visit the in-laws, and to honeymoon.

Did a search for honeymoon Kenya Obama Dunham and came up dry. Anybody else share that theory or just you?

[null and void]

I notice that you very carefully side-stepped the eye witness testimony of Barrack Sr’s first wife and the other in-laws as it militates against your blind insistence that the document that you agreed earlier on in this very thread was phony accurately reflects reality.

I’m seriously begining to think you are either quite thick, or a troll.

[null and void]

Only people who have ever met their in-laws and/or ever taken a honeymoon find it plausible.

[palmer]

the eye witness testimony of Barrack Sr’s first wife and the other in-laws

You mean as on WorldNetDaily: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78931

He said the telephone call was from Obama's paternal grandmother affirming she "was in the delivery room in Kenya when he was born Aug. 4, 1961."

Unfortunately that evidence was tossed along with the rest of Berg's case.

[null and void]

Well then. That settles it, doesn't it?

I mean a court would never throw out perfectly true evidence, would it?

What was that your hero said?...

Ah yes, "Guilty as sin, free as a bird.­ America is a great country"

[PhilDragoo]

[Fred Nerks]

HAHAHA! You always get straight to the point and don’t need a lot of words to get there!

[BIGLOOK]

A red herring, Andrew, but not a fait accompli. Undiscovered or hidden proof doesn't prove the case. The responsibility to provide necessary documents lies with Obama, something he's avoided.