Jeff Schreiber on Berg Suit Dismissal

America's Right ^ | Saturday, October 25, 2008 | Jeff Schreiber

[Scarchin]

What????

You really ARE 8 years old!

LOL

[CodeToad]

“People with poor arguments make wild and asinine accusations.”

What is so “wild and asinine” about asking someone who wants to be President to prove they are eligible?? You sound asinine.

[lefty-lie-spy]

I think this just proves that he is not biased toward McCain, and that it increases his standing for the Obama lawsuit in the first place. Berg is a 30+ year Democrat. He may not be on our team, but this is certainly a case of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” He does need support for this case, because it looks well founded. A class action suit sounds like a great idea, that would certainly meet the standing requirement.

[Scarchin]

That’s quite lawyerly - stand up in the courtroom and scream for an HONOST election.

Good luck with that.

[Scarchin]

Please learn to read.

He accused me of being an Obama supporter - wild and asinine.

[NoobRep]

He’s a peasant. Don’t bother trying to knock any sense into him. Some people just aren’t fighters-what can you do?

[Scarchin]

It also proves that he’s nuts.

[nufsed]

It was a statement of our rights, not a brief filed in court. The judges that don’t acknowledge that are undermining our system of voting. If you’re a lwayer, my condolences, then figure it out so your fellow law school grads can understand what every citizen knows.

[JerseyDvl]

Bravo Sierra ping.

[Paine in the Neck]

The absolute bedrock foundational principle of US Constitutional law must be that the people are sovereign. There should be a presumption in favor of citizens that they do have standing and that there must be a compelling reason demonstrated why standing should not be assumed a priori.

[originalbuckeye]

And Breyer rejected the 6th Circuit ruling because the Republican Party didn't have standing to ask that Brunner follow the law. If 0bama wins in November our court system will be completely lost to Left-wing activism.

[TommyDale]

My guess is that while Obama was in Hawaii looking in Grandma’s closets and attic for any remaining damaging evidence, his goons were threatening the judge in PA. Or even offering him a promotion by Obama if he wins. Nothing would surprise me.

[Scarchin]

I don’t think you understand what “rights” are and where, according to our Founders, they come from.

I’m not a LWAYER or a lawyer - but I do know the Constitution and the difference between laws and rights.

[Robert A Cook PE]

It should be noted, though, that the judge assigned to the case—the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick—was appointed to the federal bench by President William Jefferson Clinton.

Note that this very, very late ruling has the (specifically-intended) effect of preventing effective time to counter and get attention to the legality of Obama’s birthplace.

Though, of course, if there were ANY evidence (even a doctor bill for the delivery, or a hospital parking fee or baby photographer's check) that Obama was born in HI, then the demoncrats could have shown it back in September. Instead, there is NOTHING - except statements from people back in Kenya that claim he was born in Africa because BOAC refused to let his mother make a 2-day flight so soon before delivery.

[TommyDale]

"IF this was true(and it isn’t), it would wind up in impeachment proceedings - and guess who controls Congress?"

First, how do you know it isn't true? And second, why are you assuming Obama will be President? I suspect you are an Obama troll -- you certainly act like one.

[The Californian]

I am putting out a plea. Can two constituitanal lawyers please, please post plain, commonsense arguments to both sides of this issue. I would appreciate seeing it as a separate post, and in a format that could be presented to local newspapers. A brief history would also be helpful.

This seems to be a huge issue, but only because Obama refuses to release his birth certificate.

As a matter of course, all parties should submit their birth certificates - including Sarah Palin and Joe Biden... John McCain has already presented his.

I am not super good on a computer, but I would cut an paste both sides of this argument and submit them to my local newspaper.

Perhaps we can eliminate all the messy court cases, congress, etc. and just submit a thoughtful contrast of the facts to every local paper in the country and let the voters decide. Many local papers will post the two sides of a debate - I would love to see this.

Sorry if this has already been suggested or done.

[nufsed]

What I said is a right. What are the limitations of that right? Under what circumstances can an unqualified candidate be allowed to run? Do they have the right to do so? And what can a citizen do to ensure that their right to vote for constitutionally qualifed candidates is ensured?

All that legal mumbo jumbo is secondary to the right to an honest election. When you lawyer-types realize there is somthing above your ability to twist, delay, and whittle away at those rights, we'll all be better off.

[JerseyDvl]

You clearly have an agenda.

[Scarchin]

Cool you jets junior.

Wow - the slightest dissent around here lately makes one an Obama troll.

It isn’t true because the McCain campaign and high level supporters check this out. There’s nothing there.

I don’t assume anything. I was responding to a question about process.

Are you an illiterate childish troll? — you certainly act like one.

[DNME]

I figure the words “We The People” should give standing to all citizens.

Or try this ... when I enlisted in the Air Force, my oath of enlistment called for me to “uphold and defend the Constitution.”

Would that give me standing?