Posted on 10/17/2008 8:52:19 AM PDT by careyb
You said — “Much as current history students learn that the Dred Scott decision was when the slide to the Civil War nearly inevitable, so too might future students learn that the Brunner was when the Republic died (or they’ll learn it as the date the Glorious Obamunist Revolution started).”
That’s much over-dramatization and there’s no comparison between the two. They are so far apart, as a comparison, that a comparison can’t be made.
This decision is sort of a “non-event” in that someone else can file it — one who has standing. So, no..., it’s not even relevant. Get someone with standing and then we’ll see how it turns out.
Are you kidding? I’m bearing arms right now.
Wouldn’t hurt to try. If we wimp out, we will always wonder what would have happened if we made an effort.
Then you should understand. Sometimes you have to fight back, even though fighting per se is not a good thing.
If SCOTUS rules that voter fraud is ok, it’s time to fight back. If that shatters the system and the system gets rebuilt and improved, then fighting back was not morally neutral or distasteful, it was right. Just like physical combat in a just war.
I sure hope that splains it for ya! Because if the Democrat fraudsters have their way with the sanction of SCOTUS, we’re not going to be “separated from the animals” much longer.
Obviously I do understand that, thats why I have not one, but several guns.
And I didn’t need you to “’splain it to me.” I GOT IT I read my history book in grade school.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.