Posted on 09/19/2008 3:44:39 PM PDT by kronos77
Yet you did not. Explain.
I stated I had no sympathy for Sakashvilli you ingorant RINO bushbot, his move was so stupid it was beyond contempt, it was amateurish and arrogant. That idiot was so proud of how well his Israeli trained troops “defeated” the Russians until he they got their asses handed to them. Then he continued to whine about it, he did Georgia no favors and NATO stood there with a dropped jaw and no response... period.
Right. Substitute Milosevic for Sakashvilli, and you will finally understand the point I’m trying to make.
They are playing political cleanup after Sakashvilli's little harebrained stunt. It helped accomplish 3 major things:
Try answering my question: if the Russian invasion of Georgia is ok, then the whole Kosovo debacle gets a pass.
The US's objections to the Russian invasion of Georgia is completely laughable when looked at in the light of Kosovo.
I asked you a while back to find one post where I agreed to Russia's action and yet you failed (which failure seems to be a prevailing thing with you) to cough up one. You simply ran away like Sakashvilli.
So either put your money where your mouth is or swallow your turd like a man.
Funny thing about this election, I think the running mates should be switched. McCain/Biden and Obama/Palin, at least the alignment with regards to foreign policy would be more appropriate.
Putin ass-kissing aside, even if they are true American paleos, they still have it wrong.
All this blather about "excuses" is simply being made by people trying to find "excuses." And for that, they need to look in the mirror.
The only thing you illustrated here is that when confronted you ran away. So when are you going to produce those posts?
I don’t have to. Are you denying that you are trying to justify the Russian invasion of Georgia, or not? If you are, then I will. If you are not, then I’m correct and I don’t have to.
You're just a whining pussy.
“I asked you to prove it at you can’t” should be “I asked you to prove it and you can’t”
Later, when you learn a basic amount of reasoning skills (say, 6th grade-level), you can even try to elaborate.
1. You are upset that the Serbs lost the Kosovo war.I cannot break it down any more simply. I certainly know a Serb cannot.
2. You blame the current and former Leaders of the U.S. (Clinton & Bush).
3. You are affirmed by the Russian invasion of Georgia.
4. (Because) you feel it demonstrates the Kosovo War was wrong.
So why do you persist in your “after this (Kosovo), therefore because of this (Kosovo)” bullcrap? That is a logical failure of Serbian proportions.
All this blather about "excuses" is simply being made by people trying to find "excuses." And for that, they need to look in the mirror.
"IF" is the biggest word in the dictionary. We'll never know "if" Russian would have invaded Georgia in the absence of Kosovo, because there is no absence of Kosovo. It really happened. America really changed the rules. America's opinion about other countries now changing the boarders of other countries really does remain laughable. It's a really sick joke.
At the very least the actions of the United States places it in the same category of criminal states as Russia. Wonderful. Russia probably didn't need any "excuses", but hot damn did the US every hand them one all nicely gift rapped and personalized when they pulled that crap in Kosovo which we stand behind to this very day.
Imagine the laughter if someone tried to argue with a straight face that the U.S. action in Kosovo was justified by the Russian action in Chechnya, or some other Russian intervention that happens to be "convenient."
What's happening here is a confluence of a Serbian "element" seeking to justify their behavior, and the "Blame America First" crowd. And I will return to my fundamental argument (that people are ignoring because they hope it will go away): if one argues that Russia's action in Georgia is acceptable/excusable/justifiable for whatever reason, then one must argue that the U.S. action in Kosovo is the same.
I have the luxury of arguing that both interventions were wrong using a consistent standard. Everyone else is twisting themselves into pretzels.
I think you have your chronology all wrong too. Do you understand that the United States set the precedent by changing the rules about 'forcibly changing boarders' by its intervention and occupation of Kosovo?
Before the US pulled their crap in Kosovo, what the US did was considered illegal by international law. After the US pulled its crap, international law was pretty much torn up and thrown away. That rule was now null and void. Any country should be allowed to invade and change the boarders of any other country now that the US has changed that rule.
Russian intervention in Georgia happened after the US changed the rules. Once the rule is changed, the US has no right to gripe when another country takes advantage of the rule change. It was the United States that first changed the rules and set the precedent. Before they can gripe about some other country doing the exact same thing they did, the US needs to make amends for its own sins and not worry about what stupid crap other countries are pulling because of the stupid precedent it set.
Remember, Kosovo was the precedent. The US opened that can of worms. You can ignore the concept of "precedent" all you want. I can assure you that the rest of the world isn't. If Russia had set the precedent, then it would be "Blame Russia First", but it didn't. The United States did.
Consistency counts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.