Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fed to give AIG $85 billion loan and take 80% stake[Done Deal]
IHT ^ | 17 Sep 2008 | Michael J. De La Merced and Eric Dash Published:

Posted on 09/16/2008 4:49:39 PM PDT by BGHater

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-218 next last
To: ThePythonicCow

I have done so. In reply, Scoobie says:

Arf! Arrrf-arf! Arrf! Arrr-ruff! Ruff! Rrrrrrruff! Arrr-ruff! Arrf! Arrf! Arrrf-arf! Arrr-ruff! Arrrf-arf! Arrf!


181 posted on 09/16/2008 8:15:22 PM PDT by Petronski (Please pray for the success of McCain and Palin. Every day, whenever you pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Ruff! Ruff!


182 posted on 09/16/2008 8:18:30 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (By their false faith in Man as God, the left would destroy us. They call this faith change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Agreed. There are some companies that are not allowed to fail and one of them is AIG. This not just an investment bank like Lehman Brothers, tens of millions of middle class people have their money invested in AIG including retirement money. For the short and mid term this is a very good move by President Bush and the Feds. For the long run no one knows but we hope for the good and the Feds should work with the private sector to make sure that AIG will be in good shape in the long term.
183 posted on 09/16/2008 8:19:28 PM PDT by jveritas (God Bless President Bush and our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
It's very difficult to learn such stuff. Only a few of the most trusted members of the Skull & Crossbones fraternity are allowed such knowledge. <grin>

You have to enter "who owns the fed" at your nearest Google.com web page.

For example, at Who Owns the Fed?, you will read:

In the 1982 case, Lewis v. United States (see "The Lewis Decision"), the Ninth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals opined, "Federal reserve banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of a Federal Torts Claims Act, but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations."
Other sites will provide a variety of conflicting statements as to owns or controls the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve site itself claims that it is not "owned" by anyone. Good for it ;).
184 posted on 09/16/2008 8:19:43 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (By their false faith in Man as God, the left would destroy us. They call this faith change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow
Here's a question for you, if the Fed is "owned" by these secretive private banks, what are the dividends paid out on their shares?

It must be huge, right?

The Fed could make trillions a year, they just create money out of thin air. Must be some huge profit center for the owners, don't you think?

185 posted on 09/16/2008 8:24:20 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Let me apologize to begin with, let me apologize for what I'm about to say....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: bamahead; CJ Wolf

ping


186 posted on 09/16/2008 8:25:10 PM PDT by murphE (I refuse to choose evil, even if it is the lesser of two)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

“The Bureau of Engraving prints notes.”

That is a subdepartmment of the Treasury, no?

“The Fed buys Treasury Securities from Primary Dealers using newly created money.”

So primary dealers are like middle-men between the Treasury and the Fed? Is there some law on the books that says the Fed can’t purchase securities on the open market by themselves?


187 posted on 09/16/2008 8:25:14 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
AIG is too big to fail.

They got big by firing all their ethical underwriters and booking every app that came in the door. They wrote junk, on junk, and now WE'RE going to bail them out. New Rule, We the people will only bail out a private enterprise if the entire Board of Directors does a MANDATORY 5 to 10 Maximum Security time.

188 posted on 09/16/2008 8:28:02 PM PDT by j_tull (Massachusetts, the Gay State. Once leader of the American Revolution, now leading its demise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

The difference is that AIG’s debt will be honored, unlike Lehman, where the creditors will have to wait for the BK process and take their chances with recovery.

No tsunami is a good thing.

I expect both Lehmans and AIG’s officers and boards will be diligently sued by their stockholders or lawyers (allegedly) working on their behalf.


189 posted on 09/16/2008 8:29:54 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
The difference is that AIG’s debt will be honored, unlike Lehman, where the creditors will have to wait for the BK process and take their chances with recovery.

That's one why AIG was not allowed to fail. Lehman was.

190 posted on 09/16/2008 8:38:16 PM PDT by Petronski (Please pray for the success of McCain and Palin. Every day, whenever you pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

So are they going to replace the AIG on Manchester United's jersey with "FEDGOV"?

191 posted on 09/16/2008 8:48:09 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Not exactly.

They create debt out of thin air; debt on the good faith and credit of us folks. Us tax paying Americans get to pay that debt, with interest.

They can only create as much debt as we let them. In the events of the last few weeks they have shown that if they scare us enough, we'll let them create a lot of debt.

192 posted on 09/16/2008 8:50:39 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (By their false faith in Man as God, the left would destroy us. They call this faith change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
That is a subdepartmment of the Treasury, no?

Yes.

So primary dealers are like middle-men between the Treasury and the Fed?

They're like really big banks and securities firms.

Is there some law on the books that says the Fed can’t purchase securities on the open market by themselves?

I don't think so, but they have to be careful to not unnecessarily cause turbulence in the markets.

193 posted on 09/16/2008 8:52:50 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Let me apologize to begin with, let me apologize for what I'm about to say....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
Yes, but that's a bit of a slight of hand. The Treasury's Bureau of Engraving prints notes at the behest of the Federal Reserve and for delivery to the banks therein.
194 posted on 09/16/2008 8:54:27 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (By their false faith in Man as God, the left would destroy us. They call this faith change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow
they just create money out of thin air.

Not exactly.

They create debt out of thin air;

Help me out here. The Fed buys something from a Primary Dealer. They credit the Primary Dealer's account at the Fed. Where was the debt created? Take your time.

debt on the good faith and credit of us folks. Us tax paying Americans get to pay that debt, with interest.

The Fed could buy, for instance, GE or IBM bonds to boost the money supply. How would that in any way cost American taxpayers a dime?

195 posted on 09/16/2008 8:57:31 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Let me apologize to begin with, let me apologize for what I'm about to say....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

“The Fed could buy, for instance, GE or IBM bonds to boost the money supply. How would that in any way cost American taxpayers a dime?”

Are you asking how boosting the money supply costs taxpayers? It’s called inflation.


196 posted on 09/16/2008 9:07:31 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
Are you asking how boosting the money supply costs taxpayers?

I'm asking how creating money can be confused with creating debt. Maybe you could answer?

197 posted on 09/16/2008 9:10:59 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Let me apologize to begin with, let me apologize for what I'm about to say....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

“I’m asking how creating money can be confused with creating debt. Maybe you could answer?”

Well, as far as I know, the Federal Reserve doesn’t create debt. Debt is created when the federal government spends more than it takes in. This debt can be “monetized,” as they say, which involves the Federal Reserve crediting the U.S. government so it can pay its bills. In the process, the Federal Reserve expands the money supply, which taxes everyone through devalued currency. Perhaps this is what the previous poster was refering to.


198 posted on 09/16/2008 9:33:47 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
When the Fed exchanges money and securities with its primary dealers (one of the primary banks or securities firms with which it conducts open market operations) it does so primarily to control the amount of money available and short term interest rates, not primarily to create new debt.

When the Fed accepts newly created Treasury notes, from the United States Treasury, in exchange for Federal Reserve Checks given to the Treasury, which the Treasury can deposit in bank accounts as money, the Fed and the Treasury, working together, are creating new debt out of thin air against the "good faith and credit" (and future income) of the American tax payer.

When the Fed sends such Treasury Notes to the mint, it gets in return newly printed money and coins, for dispersing to its member banks, for dispensing to customers withdrawing money as cash.

199 posted on 09/16/2008 9:40:06 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (By their false faith in Man as God, the left would destroy us. They call this faith change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow
When the Fed accepts newly created Treasury notes, from the United States Treasury

The Fed doesn't buy securities from the Treasury.

the Fed and the Treasury, working together, are creating new debt out of thin air

When the government spends more than they receive in tax payments, they sell debt. The Fed has nothing to do with that. Sorry.

200 posted on 09/16/2008 9:53:23 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Let me apologize to begin with, let me apologize for what I'm about to say....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-218 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson