Posted on 08/21/2008 4:38:42 AM PDT by Renfield
In short, Obama at age 33 was put in charge of millions of dollars to be used to pattern a significant change in the educational system of American youth. Without challenge, one would assume that the change would be directed to inner city youth, as that would represent the most difficult challenge.
Instead, Obama took other people’s money, and gave it to other people, whom he knew and some were close to him.
If the project succeeded then this would not be an issue, but apparently the project was a flop, a failure....not producing one iota of hopeful reform.
I’m with you. Why in the world didn’t the opposition research begin when we knew it was between H and O, before the records were locked away? Who was asleep at the wheel here?
Important article!
Let us “hope” that Obama doesn’t entirely sink before his acceptance speech, or we will witness another “change” in the Dem party, as they replace a defective candidate with an “experienced” substitute: ta da ==== enter Nominee Clinton
“...the Annenberg Challenge is slowly entering the national consciousness, and that’s very bad news for Barack Obama...”
and since Annenburg is also a not-for-profit organization, I would think it would be bad for it too, since they seek public donations.
“What I dont understand is why the dirt digging started only in June?”
First let him defeat HRC and then defeat him. Makes perfect sense.
In a thread yesterday, a FREEPER reported that the contact number for Annenberg rings to William Ayers office.
The entire Obama campaign is one big cover-up.
If you read the Corsi book, you will see how this all fits. Bambi has created and is maintaining a separate alternative universe where only he lives. It is rather frightening that so many voters actually believe that he is a viable candidate for president.
My question is this:
Was Obama paid by CAC for his position as Chairman???
“”””The four plus years (1995-1999) Barack Obama spent as founding chairman of the board of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC) represent his track record as reformer, as someone who reached out in a public-private collaboration and had the audacity to believe his effort would make things better. At the time he became leader of this ambitious project to remake the public schools of Chicago, he was 33 years old and a third year associate at a small Chicago law firm, Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland.””””
I watched the CNN special last night on Obama’s life and they made no mention of his work at CAC. Am I surprised? No.
thanks Ernest and Renfield.
When Daley says shhh, library is quiet on Obama
The Chicago Tribune | August 21, 2008 | John Kass
Posted on 08/21/2008 1:54:10 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2065332/posts
Excellent ad material!
bump
The documents belong to CAC, of which Ayers was director.
Google "Small Schools Workshop" connected with UIC, and you get to a staff directory. From there you can go to William Ayers own page. It list his phone as # 312-413-5869.
Then Google "Chicago Annenberg Challenge"
No name, no address, only a zip (which happens to be the zip for UIC). But there is a phone number. It's the same as Ayer's office number. So if you want to talk to CAC, you have to talk to Billy Ayers.
Unfortunately, Ayers number comes back "disconnected," --I'm sure he's getting some unwanted calls.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.